Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com
Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com
Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
70 AN EXAMINATION OF SUCCESSION THEORIES<br />
15. BHAIKAHAN SINGH'S BELIEFS<br />
It is sometimes alleged th<strong>at</strong> Bhai Kahan Singh used<br />
to recant under pressure his controversial st<strong>at</strong>ements. This<br />
does not apply, <strong>at</strong> least, to the Baba Ajapal Singh controversy.<br />
At no stage did Bhai Kahan Singh ever express it as his own<br />
belief th<strong>at</strong> Baba Ajapal Singh was <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh.<br />
Throughout the period from 1912 to 1933 when this question<br />
was brought up one way or other, he had been consistent in<br />
his belief th<strong>at</strong> Ajapal Singh was only a devoted Singh <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Guru</strong> from whom he had received the Amrit and th<strong>at</strong> he<br />
had lived with the <strong>Guru</strong> for the gre<strong>at</strong>er part <strong>of</strong> his life, th<strong>at</strong><br />
he had never narr<strong>at</strong>ed his life-story to anyone and also th<strong>at</strong><br />
before his de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh had installed the <strong>Guru</strong><br />
Granth Sahib to be the <strong>Guru</strong> after him. He has, in fact,<br />
contradicted the belief <strong>of</strong> the nik<strong>at</strong>-vartis <strong>of</strong> Ajapal Singh<br />
by saying th<strong>at</strong> nobody knew who the Baba was beyond his<br />
receiving Amrit from the <strong>Guru</strong>. He even goes to the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> saying th<strong>at</strong> no one knew who his five<br />
nik<strong>at</strong>-varti Singhs were. With this there is no possibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the corrobor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> their st<strong>at</strong>ement and belief,<br />
making the confusion about Baba Ajapal Singh worse confounded.<br />
Bhai Kahan Singh did not believe the st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nik<strong>at</strong>-vartis <strong>of</strong> Ajapal Singh and he could not. therefore,<br />
form any firm opinion on the subject, as he himself says.<br />
[Phulwari, April 1927, p. 461, Appendix XIV (a), (b).]<br />
From wh<strong>at</strong> I knew <strong>of</strong> him during the years 1931-38,<br />
when I occasionally met him <strong>at</strong> Amritsar, Baramula and<br />
Nabha, I can say with confidence th<strong>at</strong>, like a genuine<br />
scholar, he was always open to conviction and he would<br />
not unnecessarily take a rigid stand on false prestige.<br />
He never considered himself to be infallible. In the 1935<br />
controversy over the birthplace <strong>of</strong> Maharaja Ranjit Singh,<br />
raised by a letter <strong>of</strong> enquiry published by Mr Edward H.<br />
Lincoln, the Deputy Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Gujranwala, in the<br />
Civil and Military Gazette <strong>of</strong> Lahore on September 27, 1935,<br />
Bhai Kahan Singh readily accepted the facts <strong>of</strong> history in<br />
favour <strong>of</strong> Gujranwala against the hearsay st<strong>at</strong>ements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
GURU GOBIND SINGH S DEATH AT NANDED 71<br />
elders <strong>of</strong> Badrukhan. [Civil & Military Gazette, November<br />
23, 1935; Bhai Kahan <strong>Singh's</strong> letter <strong>of</strong> November 4, 1935.]<br />
Under the heading '<strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib' in his well<br />
known book the Gurm<strong>at</strong> Martand, vol. I, p. 411, he refers<br />
to the holy book as Sri <strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib and tells us on<br />
page 415 th<strong>at</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the word '<strong>Guru</strong> 1 with Granth Sahib<br />
began in Samv<strong>at</strong> 1765 Bk. (A.D. 1708) when <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong><br />
Singh invested the Granth, the basic scripture <strong>of</strong> the Sikh<br />
faith, with <strong>Guru</strong>ship <strong>at</strong> Abchalnagar(<strong>Nanded</strong> in the Deccan).<br />
Bhai Kahan Singh has also answered the question <strong>of</strong><br />
those who <strong>at</strong> times ask about the volume which was invested<br />
with <strong>Guru</strong>ship. He writes on page 415 <strong>of</strong> the book mentioned<br />
above :<br />
We believe th<strong>at</strong> it was th<strong>at</strong> volume which the Tenth <strong>Guru</strong> had<br />
<strong>com</strong>pleted <strong>at</strong> Damdama Sahib after including therein the<br />
<strong>com</strong>positions <strong>of</strong> the Nineth <strong>Guru</strong> and which was lost during<br />
the Gre<strong>at</strong> Holocaust ( Wadda Ghaliighara) and <strong>of</strong> which Baba<br />
Dip Singh had previously prepared several copies. But even<br />
if no volume was available <strong>at</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> the de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>of</strong> the Tenth<br />
<strong>Guru</strong>, could there be any difficulty in the investiture ? Was<br />
<strong>Guru</strong> Tegh Bahadur present <strong>at</strong> Delhi <strong>at</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> the de<strong>at</strong>h<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Guru</strong> Har Krishan [who invested <strong>Guru</strong> Tegh Bahadur with<br />
<strong>Guru</strong>ship] ? The <strong>Guru</strong>ship could be entrusted by mental<br />
contempl<strong>at</strong>ion or through Word (<strong>of</strong> the mouth).<br />
These st<strong>at</strong>ements and writings <strong>of</strong> Bhai Kahan Singh<br />
leave no doubt about his belief th<strong>at</strong><br />
(i) <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh did not appoint anyone to succeed<br />
him as <strong>Guru</strong>, A<br />
(ii) the Tenth <strong>Guru</strong> had invested the <strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib<br />
with <strong>Guru</strong>ship,<br />
(iii) Baba Ajapal Singh was not <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh but<br />
a Sikh <strong>of</strong> his,<br />
(iv) Baba Ajapal Singh never told his life-story to<br />
anyone,<br />
(v) nobody knew anything about the identity <strong>of</strong> Baba<br />
Ajapal Singh or <strong>of</strong> the five Singhs closest to him, and<br />
th<strong>at</strong><br />
(vi) there is no evidence or pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Baba Ajapal<br />
Singh having <strong>at</strong> any time visited or lived <strong>at</strong> Jind,<br />
P<strong>at</strong>iala or Hazro.