29.03.2013 Views

Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com

Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com

Guru Gobind Singh's Death at Nanded Examination of - Vidhia.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 AN EXAMINATION OF SUCCESSION THEORIES<br />

15. BHAIKAHAN SINGH'S BELIEFS<br />

It is sometimes alleged th<strong>at</strong> Bhai Kahan Singh used<br />

to recant under pressure his controversial st<strong>at</strong>ements. This<br />

does not apply, <strong>at</strong> least, to the Baba Ajapal Singh controversy.<br />

At no stage did Bhai Kahan Singh ever express it as his own<br />

belief th<strong>at</strong> Baba Ajapal Singh was <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh.<br />

Throughout the period from 1912 to 1933 when this question<br />

was brought up one way or other, he had been consistent in<br />

his belief th<strong>at</strong> Ajapal Singh was only a devoted Singh <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Guru</strong> from whom he had received the Amrit and th<strong>at</strong> he<br />

had lived with the <strong>Guru</strong> for the gre<strong>at</strong>er part <strong>of</strong> his life, th<strong>at</strong><br />

he had never narr<strong>at</strong>ed his life-story to anyone and also th<strong>at</strong><br />

before his de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh had installed the <strong>Guru</strong><br />

Granth Sahib to be the <strong>Guru</strong> after him. He has, in fact,<br />

contradicted the belief <strong>of</strong> the nik<strong>at</strong>-vartis <strong>of</strong> Ajapal Singh<br />

by saying th<strong>at</strong> nobody knew who the Baba was beyond his<br />

receiving Amrit from the <strong>Guru</strong>. He even goes to the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> saying th<strong>at</strong> no one knew who his five<br />

nik<strong>at</strong>-varti Singhs were. With this there is no possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the corrobor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> their st<strong>at</strong>ement and belief,<br />

making the confusion about Baba Ajapal Singh worse confounded.<br />

Bhai Kahan Singh did not believe the st<strong>at</strong>ement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nik<strong>at</strong>-vartis <strong>of</strong> Ajapal Singh and he could not. therefore,<br />

form any firm opinion on the subject, as he himself says.<br />

[Phulwari, April 1927, p. 461, Appendix XIV (a), (b).]<br />

From wh<strong>at</strong> I knew <strong>of</strong> him during the years 1931-38,<br />

when I occasionally met him <strong>at</strong> Amritsar, Baramula and<br />

Nabha, I can say with confidence th<strong>at</strong>, like a genuine<br />

scholar, he was always open to conviction and he would<br />

not unnecessarily take a rigid stand on false prestige.<br />

He never considered himself to be infallible. In the 1935<br />

controversy over the birthplace <strong>of</strong> Maharaja Ranjit Singh,<br />

raised by a letter <strong>of</strong> enquiry published by Mr Edward H.<br />

Lincoln, the Deputy Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Gujranwala, in the<br />

Civil and Military Gazette <strong>of</strong> Lahore on September 27, 1935,<br />

Bhai Kahan Singh readily accepted the facts <strong>of</strong> history in<br />

favour <strong>of</strong> Gujranwala against the hearsay st<strong>at</strong>ements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

GURU GOBIND SINGH S DEATH AT NANDED 71<br />

elders <strong>of</strong> Badrukhan. [Civil & Military Gazette, November<br />

23, 1935; Bhai Kahan <strong>Singh's</strong> letter <strong>of</strong> November 4, 1935.]<br />

Under the heading '<strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib' in his well<br />

known book the Gurm<strong>at</strong> Martand, vol. I, p. 411, he refers<br />

to the holy book as Sri <strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib and tells us on<br />

page 415 th<strong>at</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the word '<strong>Guru</strong> 1 with Granth Sahib<br />

began in Samv<strong>at</strong> 1765 Bk. (A.D. 1708) when <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong><br />

Singh invested the Granth, the basic scripture <strong>of</strong> the Sikh<br />

faith, with <strong>Guru</strong>ship <strong>at</strong> Abchalnagar(<strong>Nanded</strong> in the Deccan).<br />

Bhai Kahan Singh has also answered the question <strong>of</strong><br />

those who <strong>at</strong> times ask about the volume which was invested<br />

with <strong>Guru</strong>ship. He writes on page 415 <strong>of</strong> the book mentioned<br />

above :<br />

We believe th<strong>at</strong> it was th<strong>at</strong> volume which the Tenth <strong>Guru</strong> had<br />

<strong>com</strong>pleted <strong>at</strong> Damdama Sahib after including therein the<br />

<strong>com</strong>positions <strong>of</strong> the Nineth <strong>Guru</strong> and which was lost during<br />

the Gre<strong>at</strong> Holocaust ( Wadda Ghaliighara) and <strong>of</strong> which Baba<br />

Dip Singh had previously prepared several copies. But even<br />

if no volume was available <strong>at</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> the de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>of</strong> the Tenth<br />

<strong>Guru</strong>, could there be any difficulty in the investiture ? Was<br />

<strong>Guru</strong> Tegh Bahadur present <strong>at</strong> Delhi <strong>at</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> the de<strong>at</strong>h<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Guru</strong> Har Krishan [who invested <strong>Guru</strong> Tegh Bahadur with<br />

<strong>Guru</strong>ship] ? The <strong>Guru</strong>ship could be entrusted by mental<br />

contempl<strong>at</strong>ion or through Word (<strong>of</strong> the mouth).<br />

These st<strong>at</strong>ements and writings <strong>of</strong> Bhai Kahan Singh<br />

leave no doubt about his belief th<strong>at</strong><br />

(i) <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh did not appoint anyone to succeed<br />

him as <strong>Guru</strong>, A<br />

(ii) the Tenth <strong>Guru</strong> had invested the <strong>Guru</strong> Granth Sahib<br />

with <strong>Guru</strong>ship,<br />

(iii) Baba Ajapal Singh was not <strong>Guru</strong> <strong>Gobind</strong> Singh but<br />

a Sikh <strong>of</strong> his,<br />

(iv) Baba Ajapal Singh never told his life-story to<br />

anyone,<br />

(v) nobody knew anything about the identity <strong>of</strong> Baba<br />

Ajapal Singh or <strong>of</strong> the five Singhs closest to him, and<br />

th<strong>at</strong><br />

(vi) there is no evidence or pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Baba Ajapal<br />

Singh having <strong>at</strong> any time visited or lived <strong>at</strong> Jind,<br />

P<strong>at</strong>iala or Hazro.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!