28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

movement. In harnassing “a particular way of looking at the world”, as quoted above, <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

wants to express an outlook on life and human existence, based on the central concept of<br />

Stimmung (p. 103) - a term very much associated with expressionist filmmaking. Visual<br />

experimentation – especially coming from filmmakers familiar with exterior and low-key<br />

photography or influenced by their heritage of German Expressionism - created this<br />

embracing Stimmung (mood) or texture, dependent on a distinct visual style that used<br />

moving camera, oddly angled shots, high contrast between light and <strong>da</strong>rk shading,<br />

eccentric set designs, dream-like haziness, and a chiaroscuro framing of events.<br />

In his widely influential article, Paul Schrader encouraged viewers and readers to<br />

revisit classic Hollywood crime films. Understanding that the French had had a major role<br />

in identifying film <strong>no</strong>ir, Schrader states that this body of films holds even more interest for<br />

the cinephiles and cineastes of the early 1970s in the United States: “Hollywood’s film <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

has recently become the subject of renewed interest among moviegoers and critics. (...)<br />

American movies are again taking a look at the underside of the American character”<br />

(Schrader 1972:15). These neo-<strong>no</strong>ir productions from across the Atlantic formed an art<br />

cinema exemplified by a stimulating mixture of cinematic modernism with typically <strong>da</strong>rk<br />

themes, structures, and techniques.<br />

In trying to answer the question of why <strong>no</strong>ir has become so important, James<br />

Naremore also suggests a “cinematic modernism” that facilitated the film industry and<br />

made it even more valuable and lucrative, also for the Hollywood auteurs: “If we could ask<br />

the original French commentators what American film <strong>no</strong>ir represented, they might agree<br />

that it was a kind of modernism in the popular cinema: it used u<strong>no</strong>rtho<strong>do</strong>x narration; it<br />

resisted sentiment and censorship; it revelled in the ‘social fantastic’; it demonstrated the<br />

ambiguity of human motives (...)” (Naremore 1998:38). These directors – from what is<br />

k<strong>no</strong>wn as the “Hollywood Renaissance” or “The American New Wave” (men such as<br />

Arthur Penn, Francis Ford Coppola, Robert Altman, and Martin Scorsese) – were key<br />

contributors to the marriage of art and commercial cinema that prospered in America in the<br />

early and mid seventies. Their films looked back at classic American crime cinema for<br />

inspiration, and found many models, mainly in film <strong>no</strong>ir, for their re-inventions of movie<br />

violence and motivation. For example, Schrader’s own screenplay for Taxi Driver (1976)<br />

was a key film in the makeover that is neo-<strong>no</strong>ir.<br />

412

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!