28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

characteristically more interested in theme than style. The manner in which film <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

operates with theme embedded and subsumed in the style might possibly be the reason<br />

why sociological critics have always been more enthusiastic about the themes of the<br />

Western or the gangster film, shying away from the largely stylistic tools of analysis<br />

needed for film <strong>no</strong>ir. Once again (see p. 5), it is worth recalling Schrader’s remarks in his<br />

“Notes on Film Noir”:<br />

(...) because it worked out its conflicts visually rather than thematically, because it<br />

was aware of its own identity, [film <strong>no</strong>ir] was able to create artistic solutions to<br />

sociological problems. And for these reasons films like Kiss Me Deadly, Kiss<br />

Tomorrow Goodbye and Gun Crazy can be works of art in a way that gangster<br />

films like Scarface, Public Enemy and Little Caesar can never be. (Schrader<br />

1972:14)<br />

In Part V, “Genre Revisited”, I have indicated that the antecedents of film <strong>no</strong>ir are<br />

much more diverse than with any other film genres, like science fiction, for instance, or<br />

screwball comedy, which derive mostly from a pre-existing literary genre and a more or<br />

less specific period of American history. I have also concluded that, on the other hand,<br />

genre applications tend to lack fixed limits, and many works also extend into multiple<br />

genres. James Naremore also states that “Neither the industry <strong>no</strong>r the audience follows<br />

structuralist rules, and movie conventions have always been blended together in<br />

mongrelized ways” (Naremore 1998:6). In this respect, the quotation from Robert Stam on<br />

page 395 goes on:<br />

Are genre timeless Platonic essences or ephemeral, time-bound entities? Are genres<br />

culture-bound or trans-cultural? Should genre analysis be descriptive or<br />

prescriptive? (…) While some genres are based on story content (the war film),<br />

other are borrowed from literature (comedy, melodrama) or from other media (the<br />

musical). Some are performed-based (the Astaire-Rogers films) or budget-based<br />

(blockbusters), while others are based on artistic status (the art film), racial identity<br />

(Black cinema), location (the Western) or sexual orientation (Queer cinema). (Stam<br />

2000:14)<br />

Film <strong>no</strong>ir was more of an in<strong>no</strong>vative set of stylistic tropes that influenced many<br />

studio genres or, as said above, “a discursive critical construction that has evolved over<br />

time”. In other words, it is a concept that has developed as film theorists and critics have<br />

written about the phe<strong>no</strong>me<strong>no</strong>n but the new perspectives on crime and violence and public<br />

410

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!