28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the prominent journal Cahiers du Cinéma, <strong>do</strong>minated French understanding of Hollywood<br />

for more than a decade, from the early fifties until political events and cultural changes<br />

began to make auteurism problematic in 1968 and after.<br />

In their Pa<strong>no</strong>rama du film <strong>no</strong>ir américain, French commentators Raymond Borde<br />

and Étienne Chaumeton discussed the six major sources of American film <strong>no</strong>ir. They<br />

emphasise three sociological ones, namely a new realism about violence brought about by<br />

World War II, an increase in the crime rate within American society and the extensive use<br />

of psychoanalysis. For the rest, they are to be found in the artistic context within the hardboiled<br />

crime <strong>no</strong>vel, European cinema, and certain Hollywood genres of the thirties –<br />

especially horror films, gangster movies and classic detective pictures. One particularity<br />

about this group of men from Cahiers and Positif is that they affectionately evoked the<br />

years of the mid-twenties by watching American gangster films that were “curious, <strong>no</strong>nconformist,<br />

and as <strong>no</strong>ir as one could desire” (Borde & Chaumeton 2002:2). The<br />

representation of such behaviour, that is, by questioning the <strong>do</strong>minant order, would lead<br />

the surrealists to value the apparent content of such film genres (from silent and sound<br />

comedies to horror movies, for example). Film <strong>no</strong>ir was <strong>no</strong>t excluded either. In fact, when<br />

Pa<strong>no</strong>rama appeared Borde and Chaumeton had little to say about visual style; they rather<br />

referred to it as a Zeitgeist (see p. 146), and as James Naremore points out, they gave much<br />

importance to the topics of death and to the emotional qualities of the films, which they<br />

described with the five adjectives related to surrealism, mentioned above on p. 163.<br />

Unlike the Cahiers circle, however, other leading (mainly British) film critics,<br />

writing for influential film journals and magazines (such as the British Movie), eventually<br />

moved from a purely auteurist view of American cinema to investigations of genre. Yet,<br />

film <strong>no</strong>ir as such never became a major critical concern for such magazines, specifically<br />

Movie, for a long while; they rather concentrated on the characteristic entertainment genres<br />

of that time, <strong>no</strong>tably the Hollywood Western. In fact, it was a critic outside the Movie<br />

group who published in August 1970, for the British journal Cinema, the first complete<br />

essay on film <strong>no</strong>ir in English.<br />

In his article echoing the Rolling Stones song of the time “Paint It Black”,<br />

Raymond Durgnat deviates from the thematic position assumed by Borde and Chaumeton<br />

regarding film <strong>no</strong>ir, as for him these “<strong>da</strong>rk” productions <strong>do</strong> <strong>no</strong>t aim at presenting a<br />

significant and tendentiously political account of American culture. For him, <strong>no</strong>ir movies<br />

406

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!