28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

While enforcement of the Production Code (the precursor to the MPAA rating<br />

system) ensured that “<strong>no</strong> movie character could literally get away with murder” or “make<br />

criminals seem heroic and justified” (p. 471), the fact of the matter is that <strong>no</strong>ir filmmakers,<br />

relatively free from the typical big-picture constraints of the studio system, would<br />

sometimes fly under the ra<strong>da</strong>r and present their protagonists awfully close to these<br />

situations. In the Censorship and Politics section, I have pointed out that studios were<br />

more or less forced to manufacture and market movies that were conservative, to a greater<br />

or lesser degree, both socially and politically. To provide the subject matter with interest<br />

and intrigue for a mass public, sometimes conventional A-films would deal with<br />

controversial or disturbing topics. Yet, everything was handled in an ultimately benign<br />

manner, and was expected to convey positive, reassuring messages to audiences. After all,<br />

the Production Code stated that “<strong>no</strong> picture shall be produced that will lower the moral<br />

stan<strong>da</strong>rds of those who see it” (p. 465).<br />

As its French name suggests, film <strong>no</strong>ir is <strong>no</strong>t an ordinary Hollywood “genre” (in<br />

truth, the term sounds more artistic in French and was hardly ever translated as “black<br />

cinema”). No director or screenwriter set out to make a film <strong>no</strong>ir. Yet this was an<br />

American type of film that has proved an interesting exception to many of the film forms<br />

discussed, namely in terms of style, camerawork and editing techniques. Ironically, despite<br />

all this surface technique, many <strong>no</strong>ir films were viewed as more realistic than ordinary<br />

Hollywood products, a feature of <strong>no</strong>irs often praised by American reviewers.<br />

I have thus tried to explain that the connections between <strong>no</strong>ir and realism (the<br />

eventual combination of <strong>no</strong>ir themes with realist techniques, especially location shooting<br />

and <strong>do</strong>cumentary stylisation) are often intricate. They certainly were, however, a way of<br />

paying close critical attention to social and political affairs (some <strong>no</strong>ir films could even be<br />

seen as being politically tendentious), and similarly, they were enjoyed by those who were<br />

bored with the moral patness of the usual American product. La politique des auteurs or<br />

auteur theory (its usual English rendering), discussed in section 2 of Part III, provided a<br />

similar perspective on Hollywood creators for French film culture. These directors could<br />

be considered and valued as auteurs because their films were felt to contain their own<br />

creative voices and to echo their own ideas, personified their own style, and refused to bow<br />

<strong>do</strong>wn to studio interference and be strictly commercial, at least from an ideological and<br />

aesthetical standpoint. This critical and evaluative approach, established and maintained by<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!