28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

genre was seen to play an important part in this process. Then, a major concern was<br />

evinced for the ways ideology exerted an influence on art, following theories coming from<br />

the works of Althusser, Brecht, Freud, and others. In cinematic terms, this led to the<br />

postulate that film directors and their oeuvres might provide the key to interpretation.<br />

Therefore, the sources of meaning were <strong>no</strong>w thought to come from the combination of<br />

various discursive codes present in the film text, of which the directorial code was only one<br />

strand (and so famous directors like Fuller, Hawks, and Hitchcock became filmic signifiers<br />

in their own right). In due course, this focus on signification and ideology contributed to a<br />

significant change in the way that the classical narrative film in general, and genre films in<br />

particular, were perceived.<br />

Genres thus were significant for examination as “generic analysis would involve<br />

the consideration of eco<strong>no</strong>mic and historical contexts (conditions of production and<br />

consumption), conventions and mythic functions (semiotic codes and structural patterns),<br />

and the place of particular filmmakers within genres (tradition and the individual auteur)”<br />

(Grant 2003a:xvii). In this way, genre criticism has been able to encourage new attitudes<br />

towards film, and indeed, as Grant suggests, it can be understood as a place where the<br />

overlapping (but also sometimes separate) concerns of auteurism, Marxism, semiology,<br />

structuralism, and feminism potentially possibly meet. The critic also concludes that, back<br />

in the eighties, leftist critics managed to move away from the perspective of genres as<br />

“mythic embodiments of the <strong>do</strong>minant ideology” (ibid.). A clear example of this is the way<br />

that many contemporary horror films were interpreted as a criticism of American society<br />

rather than as a mode of support for its <strong>do</strong>ubts and opressions. In this regard, Curt Siodmak<br />

argues that:<br />

In its <strong>da</strong>y, Frankenstein, the forerunner of a generation of admitted mumbo jumbo<br />

and lots of entertainment, was a true trail blazer, and in effect opened up<br />

Hollywood-produced motion pictures to both psychiatry and neurosurgery. What<br />

<strong>no</strong>w seems primitive in Metropolis or the Jekyll-Hydean cycle of werewolf<br />

pictures are simply variations on the theme which Siegfried Kracauer in From<br />

Caligari to Hitler characterised as a “deep and fearful concern with the foun<strong>da</strong>tions<br />

of the self.” (Siodmak 1968:64)<br />

While this type of film bears a certain concern for the moral state of contemporary<br />

society, with real implications for the understanding of our inner nature which engage<br />

concepts of Freudian psychoanalysis, the above article further focuses on society or at least<br />

394

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!