28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As the <strong>no</strong>ir movement entered the late forties and early fifties, many of the styles<br />

and strategies of the earlier productions were absorbed by mainstream filmmakers, and<br />

Joseph H. Lewis was certainly one of them, starting to work for the smaller studios on<br />

miniscule budgets (Gun Crazy, for example, was shot on a negligible budget for the<br />

famous King Brothers, who focused on producing low-budget tales of violence).<br />

Downbeat crime films, such as The Big Combo, indeed embrace a visual style that is more<br />

aggressive when compared to other earlier <strong>no</strong>irs.<br />

In the case of Joseph H. Lewis, this section has tried to demonstrate that his <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

work is extreme, among the strongest in its appeal to violence and sex in <strong>no</strong>ir filmmaking.<br />

Lewis displayed them in a rather unique manner, when compared to other filmmakers, and<br />

this was particularly visible from the audience’s acceptance of his films. The viewer<br />

becomes almost a virtual accomplice in the crimes of Gun Crazy, and this effect is<br />

obtained by Lewis’s unusual long takes and speed. The four-minute uninterrupted take in<br />

which Annie Laurie and Bart rob a small-town bank stands as an invigorating example.<br />

The staging of this and other similar scenes in The Big Combo are also evidence of Lewis’s<br />

artistic talent as a director. In this regard, critic Eddie Muller considers that:<br />

Joseph H. Lewis’s direction is propulsive, possessed of a confident, vigorous<br />

simplicity that all the frantic editing and visual pyrotechnics of the filmmaking<br />

progeny never quite surpassed. (Muller 1998:168)<br />

While Lewis’s Gun Crazy is a film that eroticises speed and violence behind the<br />

wheel of a car or the sensuous power that holding a gun might have, The Big Combo also<br />

suggests the same obvious sense of fatalism and perverse sexuality, when Mr Brown<br />

tortures Lt Diamond and progressively eliminates his confederates, or, as the sequence<br />

described above, when Susan Lowell utterly aban<strong>do</strong>ns herself to what is certainly an act of<br />

oral sex performed by her boyfriend, Mr Brown.<br />

From Double Indemnity in 1944 to The Big Combo in 1955 film <strong>no</strong>ir maintained a<br />

critique of mainstream affirmative film art, in which political and social disaffection is<br />

rendered in striking aesthetic terms. Lewis’s films are a final throw of the “B” movie<br />

aesthetic dice, a final outcrop of outrageous sexuality and brutality. When compared with<br />

“A” films and their subject matter in Hollywood major productions, it is possible to say<br />

that the exhilarating combination of sex and violence found in Lewis’s films, mixed with<br />

more serious themes around organised crime and corporate corruption, constituted an<br />

391

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!