28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

through win<strong>do</strong>ws, to provide the indispensable expressionistic touch. Myron Meisel<br />

accounts for this distinctive feature of the director’s style:<br />

Lewis also displays his penchant for objects in hard focus in the foreground while<br />

the action takes place farther back in the frame. The death of the girl’s mother is<br />

evoked through the metaphor of a dripping faucet and a steaming teapot, our view<br />

of them obscured by the clutter of various other kitchen objects. All of these visual<br />

devices converge in the stunningly designed climax, in which the complex motifs<br />

of framing, objects in the foreground, reprised bells on the sound track, deep focus,<br />

mirror images, and ratcheted light are orchestrated to the theme of realization.<br />

(Meisel 1975:110)<br />

Henri Cassin (Steven Geray), the re<strong>no</strong>wned detective of the Paris Sûreté, falls in<br />

love with an innkeeper’s pretty, young <strong>da</strong>ughter Nanette Michaud (Micheline Cheirel),<br />

while on an extended long due holi<strong>da</strong>y (his first break after eleven years). One night,<br />

Nanette disappears during her engagement party only to turn up dead later. Cassin reckons<br />

that Leon (Paul Marion), her old boyfriend, is the suspect for her murder, but soon he is<br />

also found dead. The high pressures of his job and the dissatisfactory love affair, with all<br />

its implications of amour fou, are what has caused Cassin’s split personality, which kills<br />

when away from his rational mind. This is most evident in the amazing final scene: as<br />

Cassin lies dying of a bullet wound on the floor of the inn, he peers through the win<strong>do</strong>w<br />

(the consistent visual motif of this film) and sees himself as he appeared when he first<br />

arrived, as a seemingly unworried man. This image fuses with that of him as a disgraced<br />

killer, whereupon Henri smashes the win<strong>do</strong>w in a vain attempt to eradicate both of his<br />

“reflections”. Ack<strong>no</strong>wledging his illness, perhaps for the first time, he exclaims: “Henri<br />

Cassin is <strong>no</strong> more. I have caught him and killed him.”<br />

Lewis’s visual style and his construction of unusual visual compositions seem to<br />

constitute his eccentric approach to his subjects. As seen, the mise-en-scène in his films<br />

highlights the physical (and often mental) entrapment of his characters, with, for instance,<br />

Nina Foch framed behind a barred win<strong>do</strong>w (fig. 108) in My Name Is Julia Ross; or Peggy<br />

Cummins and John Dall, at the rear of a claustrophobic diner with distorted walls that<br />

appear to be closing in on them. The mise-en-scène and lighting in fig. 109, for example,<br />

create a host of implications. One of the bars of the win<strong>do</strong>w is sharply reflected across<br />

Annie Laurie’s face, cutting it into two parts, underlining her split personality. Her facial<br />

expression confirms that she will <strong>no</strong>t give up; it is her determination which (she believes)<br />

371

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!