28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-mark” written in 1843, which analyses obsession<br />

with human imperfection, as well as showing the psychological impact it has on sexual<br />

relations, and other ethical and philosophical issues of that time), whereas the caricatural<br />

nature of puppetry arouses <strong>no</strong> such compulsions for him.<br />

Figure 95. Bluebeard<br />

These two examples of films show that period films have their themes rooted in<br />

<strong>da</strong>rk romantic psycho-sexual narratives. Their directors managed to create an aura of<br />

apprehension rendered by the conventions that would become common in postwar film<br />

<strong>no</strong>ir. Ulmer uses mostly the Expressionistic techniques already described previously,<br />

which included oblique camera angles and surreal sets, whereas in the case of Brahm’s<br />

film The Lodger, meticulous attention is given to authentic detail. In any case, these films<br />

reinforce the sense of peril that is <strong>no</strong>rmally implicit in Gothic productions (and obviously<br />

appropriate to the last years of WWII). Douglas Sirk’s Lured 94 (1947) deploys the same<br />

settings as the ones in The Lodger, but this time the narrative viewpoint is inverted as the<br />

central figure is a woman Sandra Carpenter (Lucille Ball), a <strong>da</strong>nce hall girl who agrees to<br />

act as bait for the Lon<strong>do</strong>n police to catch a psychotic killer who preys on women through<br />

94 The title was actually modified to Personal Column as the personnel at the Production Code<br />

Administration believed that the word “lured” sounded very much like “lurid”. Director Douglas Sirk<br />

expressed his disagreement many times, considering that the title change would generate much confusion in<br />

the viewer’s mind. He also eventually admitted that this was one of the main reasons for the film’s box office<br />

failure at that time.<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!