28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eyewitness, but at the same time, an inherent part (like an accomplice) of the pursuit and<br />

attacks perpetrated on afflicted girls that follow in the film. The filmic expression here is<br />

composed of just one shot, e<strong>no</strong>ugh to express that the human eye “surpasses” the cameraeye.<br />

We <strong>do</strong> <strong>no</strong>t get to see the object (the girl) actively, but rather passively through the<br />

killer’s retina, an incredible close-up which shows Helen’s mouth being blotted out (this<br />

from the murderer’s point of view). Or, in other words, we only receive the indications of<br />

what is happening to the object through the eye of the killer, so the camera becomes<br />

passive and registers the event that takes place in front of it.<br />

In fact, there are several sublevels within these scenes. As Metz points out, the<br />

“mirror-like nature of cinema” becomes a metaphor in the correlation between the<br />

spectator and the signifier. The spectator realises that what he or she is watching is only a<br />

recording, yet s/he chooses to understand it as reality within the realms of cinema (in this<br />

particular case, s/he understands that the eye is approaching the victim with the intent of<br />

killing her – it is reality in this sense – and yet the viewer <strong>do</strong>es <strong>no</strong>t move to protect her - it<br />

is within the realms of cinema). Then, as the camera transits to the room <strong>do</strong>wnstairs, the<br />

viewer becomes aware of the mirror-like process of the apparatus he/she is part of. Then,<br />

shifting back to the eye of the murderer, the camera helps the spectator to confirm the<br />

missing and imaginary nature of the signifier. Finally, this sequence of the eye in the film<br />

is to me the most complex and detailed example of the film’s obsession with the aggressive<br />

nature of the process of looking and being looked at.<br />

The only sound that is heard in the hotel room is the music coming from the pia<strong>no</strong><br />

that a lady plays while the film is being projected. 91 The accompanying text or music in<br />

this scene is mostly relevant for the mise-en-scène, as it fuses with the optical substance of<br />

the picture. At a given point, the camera focuses on the lady at the pia<strong>no</strong>, who suddenly<br />

strikes a higher <strong>no</strong>te as if pro<strong>no</strong>uncing a judgement about the events upstairs. In fact, all<br />

this apparent silence is suddenly broken when a crash sound is heard in the room upstairs,<br />

and when the projectionist runs up the stairs to inspect, he finds out the body of the lame<br />

girl strangled to death. In this context too, the perceptive eye of the camera (moving from<br />

one room to a<strong>no</strong>ther) is further enhanced, so to speak, by the selective hearing of the<br />

camera’s ear (again, the sound played <strong>do</strong>wnstairs by the lady differs from the sound heard<br />

in the room where the killer is). Without entering into the hierarchy of filmic codes, at the<br />

91 The film being shown in the small hotel room is actually The Sands of Dee (1912) by D.W. Griffith,<br />

starring Mae Marsh and Robert Harron, though the post sign at the entrance refers to it as “The Kiss”.<br />

321

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!