28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

one lit by J.J.’s match. “You’re <strong>no</strong>t superstitious, are you, Chris?”, to which Cross <strong>no</strong>ds,<br />

yet the camera effectively pans <strong>do</strong>wn on a single shot (like an insert) and shows him<br />

crossing the fingers of his right hand (his hidden, crossed fingers as one of many visual<br />

plays on his name), emphasising the strong psychological elements of the unfolding story.<br />

For the first time in the film the word “superstitious” is brought forward and the viewer<br />

gets to k<strong>no</strong>w about Chris’s superstition feelings, which foretell his fatal situation and<br />

therefore his self-condemnation.<br />

He and his colleagues watch through the win<strong>do</strong>w to see their boss stepping out with<br />

a young attractive woman – <strong>no</strong>t his wife – and the camera soon focuses on Chris who<br />

seems to be wrapped up in a fantasy world. This scene stresses how embarrassed Chris is<br />

by the erotic (while all the clerks rush to the win<strong>do</strong>w for a glimpse of J.J.’s mistress, he<br />

takes a furtive look, and gently withdraws as the younger men start to comment on their<br />

boss’s sexual activity). Simultaneously, the scene is almost like hindsight, presaging that<br />

blind love and desire for a woman who will transform him into a tortured, guilt-ridden<br />

murderer. Thus, oneirism 82 gradually becomes a visual motif, especially later in the film, to<br />

reveal the fear and para<strong>no</strong>ia engulfing the main character. Moreover, the deep focus used<br />

in these scenes brings to mind Roland Barthes’s system of de<strong>no</strong>tation and con<strong>no</strong>tation. The<br />

depth of focus in which the saddened Cross is removed from the main scene (the group of<br />

his colleagues) opens up the temporal and spatial dimensions of the shot.<br />

Cross leaves the room with one of his colleagues and decides to walk for a while<br />

instead of taking the underground, as he always <strong>do</strong>es, homeward-bound for Brooklyn. His<br />

deviation from routine functions as an omen about how much fate and “the web of<br />

circumstances” can mean in his life, accentuating this aspect of <strong>no</strong>ir sensibility. As it is<br />

raining hard, Chris insists upon sheltering his colleague to the bus stop under his already<br />

torn little umbrella (again a metaphor of his fore<strong>do</strong>omed life). “Say, hey, Charlie…you<br />

suppose J.J. is running around with that young lady?”, asks Chris while standing<br />

(ironically) in front of a jewellery store. Charlie (Samuel S. Hinds) just replies: “It looks<br />

that way”. Then Chris <strong>do</strong>wnheartedly, but with aroused interest, adds, stammering again on<br />

the first person: “I-I-I wonder what it must be like ... well to be – to be loved by a young<br />

girl like that. You k<strong>no</strong>w, <strong>no</strong>body’s ever looked at me like that. Not even when I was<br />

young…” Before Charlie hops on his bus, we are told that Chris is a Sun<strong>da</strong>y painter:<br />

82 Here I would like to recall the idea of the “oneiric” presented by Borde and Chaumeton (p. 163).<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!