28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the <strong>no</strong>ir cycle, with films like Jules Dassin’s Night and the City (1950) or Robert Aldrich’s<br />

Kiss Me Deadly (1955).<br />

For more than three decades the Catholic Church through its Legion of Decency<br />

retained the means and the power to control the content of Hollywood films. I here<br />

<strong>do</strong>cument the way Hollywood studios submitted their films for approval (or outright<br />

disapproval) and consequent rating, and I interpret the way these censorial bodies dictated<br />

to executive producers the amount of sex and violence that was allowable on the screen.<br />

Two distinct moments in Hollywood filmmaking will then be considered: the period which<br />

is often termed “Pre-Code” (1930-1934) and the years that followed it, when the<br />

Production Code was a<strong>do</strong>pted with all its guidelines and principles. I describe its<br />

mechanisms and the three “General Principles” that first appeared in order to understand<br />

why European Cinema could address themes, topics and problems in a much less restricted<br />

way than classical Hollywood Cinema. Appendix II, at the end of this dissertation, contains<br />

those general principles and the particular applications prescribed by “The Motion Picture<br />

Production Code”. This appendix should therefore help to explain the many scenes in <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

films, especially those related with sexual liaisons and their consequences, which had to be<br />

properly “adjusted” to render them more suitable by the rules of the Code. 5 As I address<br />

the Code itself, I will emphasise how much it was imposed on <strong>no</strong>ir directors and producers<br />

in an attempt to play themes such as villainy in a “poetic” manner, or depict sexual content<br />

(for example, a persistent but somewhat in<strong>no</strong>cent kiss as a metonymy for lovemaking, or,<br />

from a semiotic point of view, in Out of the Past (1947) where symbols like the fishing<br />

nets and the rain or even more pragmatically the <strong>do</strong>uble-entendres between a <strong>do</strong>or flying<br />

open and fireworks going off are suggestive of a powerful sexual magnetism).<br />

The objective is to understand the reasons why some <strong>no</strong>ir films, arresting in their<br />

sophisticated visual style and thematic duplicity, were initially banned by the Hollywood<br />

Production Code censors, as was for example Double Indemnity. 6 The complexity of this<br />

wartime censorship may have restricted the range of themes and issues introduced by<br />

5<br />

Paragraph II. Sex.“Scenes of Passion – a) They should <strong>no</strong>t be introduced when <strong>no</strong>t essential to the plot; b)<br />

Excessive and lustful kissing, lustful embraces, suggestive postures and gestures, are <strong>no</strong>t to be shown; c) In<br />

general passion should so be treated that these scenes <strong>do</strong> <strong>no</strong>t stimulate the lower and baser element.” See<br />

Code on p. 465.<br />

6<br />

Double Indemnity is also said to have been blacked out by wartime restrictions on lights. This will also be<br />

further explained in this chapter.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!