28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stroud (Ray Milland), who finds himself trapped inside “the big clock” and its grinding<br />

gears at its climax.<br />

Indeed, much of the action of the film, as James Naremore <strong>no</strong>tes, is “based on long<br />

takes or sequence shots requiring complicated camera movements – as when Ray Milland<br />

secretely enters the kitchen <strong>do</strong>or of a luxury apartment, discovers a dead body in the living<br />

room, rearranges the evidence, retraces his steps through the kitchen, holds a brief<br />

conversation with a man in the hallway, and exits via the elevator” (Naremore 1998:167).<br />

The most effective scenes in that film are designed to convey the scattered, lumi<strong>no</strong>us<br />

lighting of a Manhattan office building during working hours. These stylistic features<br />

constitute essential elements in defining film <strong>no</strong>ir as a visual ico<strong>no</strong>graphy, made up of what<br />

Geoffrey O’Brien calls “a nexus of fashions in hair, fashions in lighting, fashions in<br />

interior décorating, fashions in motivation, fashions in repartee” (O’Brien 1991:45).<br />

In Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train the presence of similar machines, namely<br />

trains and clocks, establishes a precise timetable for the whole film. In many <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

productions trains represent a (false) escape from the <strong>no</strong>ir city, and in this film, together<br />

with the clocks, the train specifically represents an oppressive force that indicates a realitybending<br />

process. The two parallel train tracks appear to deviate from their mechanical<br />

logic, when criss-crossing at a certain time, indicating the coexistence of good and evil that<br />

lurks within us all. Guy Haines (Farley Granger), an apparently soft-speaking and goodhearted<br />

man, begins a sudden conversation about “criss-cross” murders with Bru<strong>no</strong><br />

Anthony (Robert Walker) - this is when two men each kill people who are the enemies of<br />

the other. Thus, as Robert Stam <strong>no</strong>tes, this “elaborate verbal and visual play on the<br />

expressions “criss-cross” and “<strong>do</strong>uble-cross” (crossed railroad tracks, crossed legs, crossed<br />

tennis racquets, tennis <strong>do</strong>ubles, <strong>do</strong>uble scotches, alternating montage as <strong>do</strong>uble, (...) and so<br />

forth)” (Stam 1992:64) enforces a significant iconic recognition (the codes by which we<br />

recognise objects) and iconic designation (the codes by which we name them). As Charles<br />

Peirce would declare the fusion of the iconic world with that of the symbolic creates a new<br />

dimension. In this particular film, for instance, featuring two Doppelgänger characters,<br />

Hitchcock draws attention to the articulation of word and image, at times structuring<br />

sequences through near linguistic formulations (for example, the cross pattern on the<br />

cigarette lighter – fig. 71).<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!