28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 66. Double Indemnity<br />

In the case of Scarlet Street, there is also an observable crisis of masculinity<br />

embodied by Chris. The scenes in which we see him dressed in his apron have this sort of<br />

overtone. For example, he shows signs of an extreme physical weariness throughout; and<br />

in a psychological manner, a strong desire to cease this agony as if a rope around his neck<br />

would put an end to his life but above all to his emotional torment, his enforced meekness<br />

and malleability of mind. Following Frank Krutnik’s argument that film <strong>no</strong>ir underlines the<br />

problematic aspects of masculine identity, Scarlet Street reinforces <strong>no</strong>ir’s emphasis on<br />

male characters, specifically Chris Cross, who appears to be incapable of overcoming his<br />

Freudian Oedipus complex, and who is, as Krutnik <strong>no</strong>tes, “perhaps evidence of some kind<br />

of crisis of confidence within the contemporary regimentation of male-<strong>do</strong>minated culture”<br />

(Krutnik 1991:91). Being a married man, Cross feels sexually compromised and the apron<br />

emphasises how much he is sexually caught up and castrated, especially later in the film<br />

when he meets Kitty March (Joan Bennett). Finally, it also accentuates that beneath that<br />

pathetic-looking apron lies a man waiting, with a self-contained life exposing his misery.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!