28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oth in these French productions of the late thirties and the American movies so newly<br />

arrived in France.<br />

Section 1 is concluded with an analysis of the so-called American Expressionism in<br />

films. I seek to explain how the cycle of horror films produced by Universal Studios in the<br />

early thirties (launched by the American Tod Browning’s Dracula and the British James<br />

Whale’s Frankenstein) was also a key influence on the studio’s <strong>no</strong>ir productions, starting<br />

with Hitchcock’s Sha<strong>do</strong>w of a Doubt (1943) and Siodmak’s Phantom Lady (1944). During<br />

his Hollywood career, James Whale, a man with a great feeling for Gothic forms, directed<br />

(and sporadically produced) about twenty movies, most of them for Universal Pictures. He<br />

attained his international re<strong>no</strong>wn with Frankenstein (1931), The Old Dark House (1932),<br />

The Invisible Man (1933), and The Bride of Frankenstein (1935). These films will be<br />

discussed in this section, along with those of Val Lewton (specifically, Cat People (1942)<br />

and The Leopard Man (1943)), as they constitute a whole series of visually distinctive and<br />

high aesthetic quality productions, which, in turn, helped to create an in<strong>no</strong>vative bridge to<br />

film <strong>no</strong>ir.<br />

I believe this first section serves the useful purpose of comprehending the amalgam<br />

of varied cultural and literary circumstances that were around at the inception of the <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

phe<strong>no</strong>me<strong>no</strong>n, even if “cultural history is too diffuse to allow for clear casual relationships;<br />

the most it can attempt is to establish a chain of plausibility” (Maltby & Craven 1995:38).<br />

It is crucial then to ack<strong>no</strong>wledge the extent to which <strong>no</strong>ir was the product of a variety of<br />

forms and pressures rising both from within and from outside the Hollywood cinema of the<br />

forties.<br />

In Section 2 I further contextualise film <strong>no</strong>ir, this time from a social and political<br />

viewpoint. I demonstrate that film <strong>no</strong>ir also contains visible signs of the detailed conditions<br />

of production and reception of the forties and fifties period, during which the American<br />

film industry experienced an ongoing and deep transformation. Once the last menaces to<br />

the return to peace became less apparent, an intense anti-communist campaign set in after<br />

the war and represented the most long-lasting obsession of American society. This<br />

particular period in the United States is k<strong>no</strong>wn as the Second Red Scare, and is commonly<br />

associated with “McCarthyism”. The climate of fear and para<strong>no</strong>ia in American society, the<br />

Cold War against Communism, and the threat of nuclear destruction are often reflected in<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!