28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

structures similar to language (like a road code, art, music and literature); whereas<br />

semiology is the general theory, the metalanguage 73 dealing with all common semiotic<br />

aspects. These dual origins have long been studied by theorists (some, like Julia Kristeva,<br />

would argue that “semiotics” studies the signifier) but, over time, both terms have been<br />

applied in an alternate manner, although more recently the term “semiotics” is more<br />

extensively employed and seems to be replacing the more static term of “semiology”.<br />

Although Saussure had identified the way to express the combination between the<br />

two elements of S/s (capital “S” for signifier and lower case “s” for signified) 74 and the<br />

relationship that exists between signs in these two planes, it was Barthes who more fully set<br />

about an analysis of the rapidly developing forms of contemporary popular culture, as seen<br />

above, and the way signs operate in culture. He worked most exclusively on a semiological<br />

system, that of langue, and identified two orders of signification: de<strong>no</strong>tation and<br />

con<strong>no</strong>tation. The linguistic sign (the word) is hence imbued in the signification, as he<br />

stresses in his Mythologies: “Le mot est ici d’autant mieux justifié, que le mythe a<br />

justement une <strong>do</strong>uble fonction: il désigne et il <strong>no</strong>tifie, il fait comprendre et il impose”<br />

(Barthes 1970:202). 75 Barthes explains in his book the way the photograph of a young<br />

black African in French uniform conceals a hidden meaning, clearly stressing the idea of<br />

signification and myth in the visual media in the light of the work of linguists, such as<br />

Saussure and the Danish linguist Louis Hjelmslev. Here is the cover of the magazine<br />

followed by his remarks:<br />

73<br />

When the term “metalanguage” was first coined by the logicians of the School of Vienna (Ru<strong>do</strong>lph Carnap<br />

(1891-1970) being its major contributor), a certain controversy was installed. All in all, Carnap wanted to<br />

show that the language we use to speak can also speak of itself.<br />

74<br />

Interestingly, Jacques Lacan himself was very keen on Saussure’s theories and wanted to demonstrate the<br />

primacy of the signifier in the psyche by placing the capitalised Signifier above a lower case and italicising<br />

the signified (S/s) so as to prove that they both interrelate.<br />

75<br />

“The word is better justified, the myth has precisely two functions: it designates and it <strong>no</strong>tifies, it makes it<br />

clear and it imposes” (my translation).<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!