28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV. Semiotic Analysis of Key Noir Movies<br />

1 From a Semiotic Perspective<br />

It seems a strange thing when one comes to ponder over it,<br />

that a sign should leave its interpreter to supply a part of its<br />

meaning; but the explanation of the phe<strong>no</strong>me<strong>no</strong>n lies in the<br />

fact that the entire universe – <strong>no</strong>t merely the universe of<br />

existents, but all that wider universe, embracing the universe<br />

of existents as a part (...) is perfused with signs, if it is <strong>no</strong>t<br />

composed exclusively of signs (Peirce 1998:394)<br />

As mentioned in the introduction, the main objective of this part is to discuss the<br />

<strong>no</strong>tion of film “symbol” from a semiotic perspective, as suggestive of certain abstractions,<br />

and understand how icons in the films of the classic <strong>no</strong>ir era are part of a consistent<br />

signifying pattern. I will describe as systematically as possible the symbols portrayed in<br />

given scenes to provide the reader with clear evidence of film <strong>no</strong>ir’s unique methods of<br />

visual signification.<br />

Semiotics has been criticised as an imperialistic discipline but at the same time<br />

commended as being the most wide-ranging of fields. I believe the overarching metadiscipline<br />

of semiotics brings a new and rich conceptualisation to forms of human<br />

expression. Theorist Jonathan Culler ack<strong>no</strong>wledges that “the major problem of semiotics is<br />

its ambitions,” but positively recognises that its “value (…) is linked to its unwillingness to<br />

respect boun<strong>da</strong>ries, (…) to the conviction that everything is a sign” (in Suhor 1984:247).<br />

From the very beginning of time and throughout human evolution, human beings<br />

have always tried to make sense of or to create meaning through the establishment and<br />

interpretation of “signs”. Charles Sanders Peirce was the American philosopher who first<br />

coined the term “semiotics”. Other theoreticians argue though that the term was first<br />

created by the Swiss linguistician Ferdinand de Saussure, when he presented a series of<br />

lectures on structural linguistics at the beginning of the twentieth century. I agree with this<br />

view, based on the fact that semiotics is generally attributed to his theories rather than<br />

Peirce’s and that his theories are still <strong>no</strong>w being used and have had a greater influence<br />

when it comes to film theory. My discussion will therefore concentrate on his theories. I<br />

am obviously <strong>no</strong>t ig<strong>no</strong>ring here what John Locke, back in the seventeenth-century,<br />

252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!