28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 61. Where the Sidewalk Ends Figure 62. Where the Sidewalk Ends<br />

particular scenes, the viewer can see the skilled cinematography and film direction of<br />

Where the Sidewalk Ends, and its visual treatment of themes such as the psychological<br />

pressure of guilt and liberation.<br />

Where the Sidewalk Ends was the last of Otto Preminger’s studio pictures at Fox.<br />

Along with Laura and Fallen Angel, the film constitutes an important <strong>no</strong>ir trilogy of<br />

Preminger as auteur. When watching his films, apart from a remarkable, fluid mise-enscène<br />

and singular camerawork, his consistency in maintaining the moral ambiguity of his<br />

characters is <strong>no</strong>table. In fact, the characters displayed in these three films all have a<br />

primary struggle within themselves; Preminger’s crowded mise-en-scènes (see figs 61 and<br />

62) are filled with incredible tension. In this way, Preminger has a rather unique way of<br />

highlighting interpersonal dynamics with scenes that intensify the characters’ aggressive<br />

relationships with one a<strong>no</strong>ther. This in fact constitutes his personal hallmark, an approach<br />

of detachment and neutrality towards his characters and above all with his audience. In an<br />

article called “Why Preminger?” published in the magazine Movie in November 1962, the<br />

answer to this question, when analysing Preminger as an auteur, is essentially revealed in<br />

his directorial attitude:<br />

His aim is to present characters, actions and issues clearly and without prejudice.<br />

This objectivity is a mark of his respect for his characters and, particularly, for his<br />

audience. He presupposes an intelligence active e<strong>no</strong>ugh to allow the spectator to<br />

make connections, comparisons and judgements (...) His films are about ways of<br />

reaching decisions – on facts and on courses of action (...) Fluidity (of<br />

development, <strong>no</strong>t indecision) distinguishes Preminger’s visual style as it<br />

distinguishes his narrative method and his moral attitude. (Wood 1962:18)<br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!