28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

flashback, and the dreamlike almost ethereal presence of Laura sets the <strong>no</strong>ir Freudian tone<br />

of this whodunit story. Detective McPherson, through the testimony of Laura’s friends and<br />

letters, comes to k<strong>no</strong>w Laura posthumously and slowly falls in love with the dead woman,<br />

mainly <strong>da</strong>zzled by her portrait which hangs on the big living room wall over the fireplace<br />

(fig. 60).<br />

From a semiotic perspective, the film contains familiar motifs which will be further<br />

analysed in the next Part. The portrait is indeed the most relevant of these as it embodies<br />

the absent Laura: one night McPherson falls asleep while watching the portrait on the wall<br />

and is suddenly awakened by the sound of Laura who shows up to him like a dream or a<br />

ghost. Similarly to Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray, the portrait here becomes the<br />

analysis of a man’s desire to impose their imaginary visions of idealised femininity onto<br />

women. All three men, especially McPherson during his investigation, are put into a trance<br />

by the enthralling Laura’s enigma and magnetism transmitted through the portrait. The<br />

above scene shows the employment of <strong>no</strong>ir trademarks, beyond the sha<strong>do</strong>wy black-andwhite<br />

cinematography. In the centre of the living-room, the supercilious art critic stretches<br />

his right arm out to the portrait of Laura who has become a personification of his refined<br />

aesthetic ideals. The meaningful look that he gives McPherson emphasises how much he<br />

himself is a self-centred man, despising McPherson’s “muscular and handsome” (his own<br />

words) physicality and establishing the link between the portrait of Laura (appropriately<br />

painted by Lydecker) and the fascination McPherson feels for Laura, who may be just a<br />

figment of his imagination. All these subtexts constitute an interesting theme of the image<br />

and raises questions about the role of the movie and the spectator as prone to similar<br />

fixations.<br />

One year later, in 1945, Otto Preminger brings back Dana Andrews to star, this<br />

time as a drifter, Eric Stanton, who is pushed off a San Francisco bus for lack of money.<br />

He lands in Pop’s Eats, a diner where he immediately develops a fondness for a sexy<br />

restaurant waitress named Stella (Lin<strong>da</strong> Darnell) and on whom everybody in town seems to<br />

have a crush. Preminger returns to his familiar territory of moral ambiguity in Fallen<br />

Angel, using Andrews as a personification of indecisiveness: he imagines if he had money<br />

Stella would eventually respond to his advances. He marries the local spinster June Mills<br />

(Alice Faye), as a prelude to a quick divorce and anticipated cash settlement to go back to<br />

his waitress. The moral ambiguity is further stressed when, on learning about his dishonest<br />

246

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!