28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elationship to the way a director thinks and feels” (in Wartenberg & Curran 2005:105),<br />

has gradually given way to a new debate from the point of view of genre theory originating<br />

in André Bazin. In April 1957, Bazin wrote an essay entitled “On the Politique des<br />

Auteurs” published in Cahiers where he raises a number of arguments against auteurism,<br />

mainly about the fact that the theory refused to recognise the role of the so-called popular<br />

culture and, more explicitly, genre. Referring to comedy, the Western, and the gangster<br />

film genres, Bazin states, they were built up “in wonderfully close harmony with the<br />

public” which is exactly what gives films their “vigour and richness”. It was the centrality<br />

of genre, in Bazin’s opinion, that made it possible for directors in Hollywood to produce<br />

masterpieces. More specifically, he adds, it is because of the relationship that genre<br />

maintains with the audience that reveals “the genius of the system” which is more<br />

admirable than the talent of a particular director. It is <strong>no</strong>t my intention here to engage in an<br />

exhaustive textual analysis of the auteur theory. In any case, the theory, I think, is less a<br />

matter of comprehensiveness than of strategy – the recognition, for example, that a detail<br />

which might at first appear irrelevant provides a perspective from which other apparently<br />

irrelevant details suddenly emerge in a<strong>no</strong>ther kind of coherence. After all, as Sarris so well<br />

put it, “The task of vali<strong>da</strong>ting the auteur theory is an e<strong>no</strong>rmous one, and the end will never<br />

be in sight” (in Wartenberg & Curran 2005:106).<br />

Although the list of directors that have some claim to auteur status is extensive<br />

(from Jules Dassin, Samuel Fuller to Anthony Mann, Robert Siodmak, etc), I have decided<br />

to concentrate here on three related to film <strong>no</strong>ir, as many of the other possible choices are<br />

discussed in other parts of this thesis. The filmmakers that I chose are Billy Wilder, Orson<br />

Welles, and Otto Preminger, as each produced a substantial body of interesting films and<br />

all three were intimately connected with the emergence of film <strong>no</strong>ir. And although the<br />

auteur theory highlights the body of a director’s work rather than isolated masterpieces, I<br />

have decided to look at the above directors’ films that are related to the world of <strong>no</strong>ir. This<br />

analysis, therefore, intends to show the greatness of some of these auteurs based on the<br />

aesthetics of their productions, concentrating on what is original and how they managed,<br />

with intelligence and intuition, to resist to artistic control within the producer-oriented<br />

studio systems. I want to stress that their ack<strong>no</strong>wledged pre-eminence is to be found in<br />

their ability to establish their own personal expression and style.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!