28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

this study brings into view the general tendencies of <strong>no</strong>ir (subdivided into three broad<br />

phases: the first, the war-time period (1940-1946 roughly) which was the moment of the<br />

private eyes of Hammett and Chandler; the second, the postwar “realistic” – and more<br />

active - period (from 1945 to 1949), ; and the third, the closing phase of film <strong>no</strong>ir (1949 to<br />

1958 approximately), a psychologically troubled era), and necessarily raises questions<br />

about its thematic and stylistic evolution, as well as the issues of narrative and generic<br />

differentiation which mark this particular time-frame.<br />

Some scholars believe film <strong>no</strong>ir never really ended, but simply declined in<br />

popularity, only to be later revived in a slightly changed form. Other critics - probably a<br />

majority - regard films (and here I would agree with them) made outside the classic period<br />

to be something other than genuine film <strong>no</strong>ir. Most of these critics view true film <strong>no</strong>ir as<br />

belonging to a cycle or period, and consequently, they estimate that any other succeeding<br />

film would just aim at imitating previous classic movies. Being totally aware of a <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

style, these film directors and producers would then <strong>no</strong>t be regarded as completely original<br />

as their predecessors of film <strong>no</strong>ir.<br />

With this study, I ack<strong>no</strong>wledge Damico’s call for “the urgent need at this point for a<br />

complete restructuring of critical approach and metho<strong>do</strong>logy, in effect, a new attack on the<br />

subject which would be specific rather than general, inductive rather than deductive, and<br />

investigatory rather than conclusive; in short, an examination of FN [Film Noir] which is<br />

interested in working from the objects of study outward rather than in imposing<br />

assumptions upon those which suit such assumptions” (in Silver & Ursini 1996:99).<br />

Globally speaking, this study is meant to follow these orientations, and to avoid an “allinclusive”<br />

approach, meaning that I will engage with the <strong>no</strong>ir myth as a cultural<br />

phe<strong>no</strong>me<strong>no</strong>n, which is much more multifaceted than just a diversity of textual conventions<br />

reflecting a social disquiet. Therefore, the first thing to call to mind is that these films echo<br />

the consequential social uncertainties of a specific time period, that is, immediately<br />

occurring during and after World War II and out of the Depression. With the immense<br />

changes in the eco<strong>no</strong>mics and censorship of movies, film <strong>no</strong>ir displayed a dissimilar image,<br />

contrasting with the positive message of hope that Hollywood’s musicals and screwball<br />

comedies, for example, projected.<br />

The origin of film <strong>no</strong>ir as a new strain in both wartime and postwar Hollywood<br />

cinema was elaborated further in French film criticism. When France started receiving the<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!