28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>no</strong>ticeably the case, for example, with the American Hitchcock who was adversely<br />

compared with the British Hitchcock, or the American Fritz Lang versus the German Fritz<br />

Lang.<br />

Film critic Andrew Sarris was the leading advocate of the “auteur theory” in the<br />

United States. In his “Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962” which was inspired by other<br />

critics in Cahiers, Sarris establishes a list of the fourteen Hollywood directors 65 he<br />

considers worthy of entry into his pantheon. The list, far from being exhaustive, <strong>do</strong>es <strong>no</strong>t<br />

include the work of such directors as Billy Wilder or Stanley Kubrick, for example.<br />

Attacks in the US were immediately registered both on the excesses expressed by the<br />

critics of Cahiers and by the provocative list of names proposed by Andrew Sarris.<br />

Regarding the auteur theory, just as Truffaut did, Sarris considered it to be a “polemical<br />

weapon for a given time and a given place” (in Wartenberg & Curran 2005:104). He also<br />

added that the contribution of each director to a certain film had less to <strong>do</strong>, from a stylistic<br />

point of view, with the work of other directors on the project than with his own previous<br />

work, as he stresses about the <strong>no</strong>ir High Sierra (1941):<br />

Sometimes, a great deal of corn must be husked to yield a few kernels of internal<br />

meaning. I recently saw Every Night at Eight [1935] one of the many maddeningly<br />

routine films Raoul Walsh has directed in his long career. This 1935 effort featured<br />

George Raft, Alice Faye, Frances Langford, and Patsy Kelly in one of those<br />

familiar plots about radio shows of the period. The film keeps moving along in the<br />

pleasantly unpretentious manner one would expect of Walsh until one<br />

incongruously intense scene with George Raft thrashing about in his sleep,<br />

revealing his inner fears in mumbling dream-talk. The girl he loves comes into<br />

the room in the midst of unconscious avowals of feeling and listens<br />

sympathetically. This unusual scene was later amplified in High Sierra [1941] with<br />

Humphrey Bogart and I<strong>da</strong> Lupi<strong>no</strong>. The point is that one of the screen’s most virile<br />

directors employed an essentially feminine narrative device to dramatize the<br />

emotional vulnerability of his heroes. If I had <strong>no</strong>t been aware of Walsh in Every<br />

Night at Eight, the crucial link to High Sierra would have passed un<strong>no</strong>ticed. Such<br />

are the joys of the auteur theory. (in Mast & Marshall 1979:665)<br />

The “joys of the auteur theory” were soon translated into something broader for<br />

Sarris, who believed that the auteur theory diverged from the theory (or the cinema) of<br />

directors. Aware of this, and to avoid being “accused of misappropriating a theory <strong>no</strong> one<br />

65 As an important reference, the list includes the names of Robert Flaherty, John Ford, D. W. Griffith,<br />

Howard Hawks, Buster Keaton, and Orson Welles, from the American side; Fritz Lang, Ernst Lubitsch, F.<br />

W. Murnau, Max Ophuls, and Joseph von Sternberg, from the German side; Charles Chaplin, Alfred<br />

Hitchcock, from the British directors; and the French Jean Re<strong>no</strong>ir.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!