28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

structures of constituted authority, and most categorically distanced from law and<br />

propriety.<br />

As I have mentioned in the chapter “The Gangster Film”, in this genre radical<br />

personal accomplishment was negatively depicted in contrast to what made a respectable<br />

society (this was one of the main means of expression that Hollywood used to reinstate the<br />

values of family and legal institutions and to discourage criminal or <strong>no</strong>nstan<strong>da</strong>rd<br />

behaviour). This radical individualism had to be eventually eliminated so as to safeguard<br />

the community values which were gradually being subverted in the early thirties.<br />

Culturally speaking, as seen before, the screen presence of these figures was envisaged as a<br />

potential <strong>da</strong>nger to the reconstruction of social stability. Film <strong>no</strong>ir’s exploration of themes<br />

of radical individualism retained an eco<strong>no</strong>mic dimension but often blurred it with sexual<br />

fulfilment. This <strong>da</strong>rk moral reversal can be seen as a risk-taking in both form and<br />

substance. While mood <strong>do</strong>minated <strong>no</strong>ir, rather than plot, as a cinematic category film <strong>no</strong>ir<br />

was constructed around frustrations and fears, psychological chaos and para<strong>no</strong>ia, all very<br />

often embodied in the troubling experience of defeat. As I said above, film <strong>no</strong>ir worked<br />

against these idealised <strong>no</strong>tions of family, community and public commitment, presenting<br />

rather a <strong>da</strong>rk, apprehensive culture of aggressive opportunism.<br />

Apart from being a remarkable movie from the point of view of narrative technique<br />

(the film is a multiple first-person narration and presents the same events seen from various<br />

perspectives), The Big Clock illustrates the individualism common in American society of<br />

the late forties and fifties. George Stroud (Ray Milland) gets caught in this web of<br />

circumstances and in the predicament of a wrongly-accused man. His ironic search for<br />

himself (he secretly carries out his own investigation) leads him to raise the possibility of<br />

his own moral guilt, and he feels convicted. As his fate appears to close in on him, he turns<br />

a cold eye on his marriage and his job, in both of which he feels trapped. The film<br />

accentuates thus the feeling of instability and precariousness of the <strong>no</strong>rmal every<strong>da</strong>y world,<br />

which is after all one of the core effects of the <strong>no</strong>ir narrative.<br />

It has been emphasised throughout this work that the topic of culpability seems to<br />

invade most <strong>no</strong>ir productions, with protagonists living a fugitive existence in which every<br />

recess brings on terror. Bradford Galt (Mark Stevens) is the voice of most <strong>no</strong>ir protagonists<br />

in The Dark Corner. As a private eye, just released from a San Francisco prison where,<br />

after being framed, he has served two years for manslaughter, Galt personifies the<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!