28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.1 Radical Individualism<br />

This chapter brings to the fore the issue of radical individualism associated with<br />

crime / violence and personal greed since these form, as seen in Part II, the subtexts of preproduction<br />

code films of the thirties (with the gangster pictures, for instance). In many<br />

respects film <strong>no</strong>ir represents a manifestation of fragmentation at the several levels<br />

described in the foregoing sections. Here I would like to concentrate on the individual, on<br />

the psychological disintegration of the <strong>no</strong>ir protagonist, and simultaneously to reference<br />

other disruptive effects registered in <strong>no</strong>ir productions.<br />

Psychologically, therefore, the <strong>no</strong>ir narrative is indeed an exploration of the<br />

personal identity crises of its protagonists. The many examples of films given so far that<br />

depict the <strong>do</strong>minant worldview in <strong>no</strong>ir clearly express a para<strong>no</strong>id and claustrophobic state<br />

of mind on the part of the main protagonist. The impersonality of <strong>no</strong>ir cities, such as Los<br />

Angeles and San Francisco, is then transposed to the “inner city” of the hero’s imagination<br />

in which desperation and alienation seem to govern. The urban landscape shows <strong>no</strong><br />

independent existence from the <strong>no</strong>ir hero, but rather functions as a symbolic immoral<br />

correlative of the futile search for happiness, implying destruction of the self and that of<br />

others too. This hostile urban jungle is very similar to the personal jungles encountered in<br />

films like Pitfall or more strikingly in Robert Siodmak’s Criss Cross. Narrative devices<br />

reinforce how much the action of the <strong>no</strong>ir characters are a product of fate and constrained<br />

by their troubled pasts. These devices further accentuate the <strong>do</strong>omed and desolate world<br />

characterised by pre<strong>da</strong>tory sexuality, <strong>da</strong>rkness and violence and it all eventually translates<br />

into enigmas of personal identity which function as expository of or even as a form of<br />

psychoanalysis of the main character (adumbrating, fragmentation, fractional recovery, but<br />

then ultimate loss).<br />

Thematically, the topic of fragmentation is emblematically expressed through the<br />

dissolution of the family unit like in Pitfall, this unit traditionally being the mainstay in<br />

American conservative cinema. The opening scenes of the film set up the life of John<br />

Forbes (Dick Powell) in terms of home, family and work. While his wife, Sue (Jane<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!