28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the idea was to maintain stan<strong>da</strong>rds of quality since they produced high-cost films; however,<br />

for the second, these films constituted an accessible type of product that could attract an<br />

audience at a lower cost. To a degree, Hollywood (while overseeing all these aspects<br />

through a professional control over production and marketing) developed and transformed<br />

new measures for narrative elaboration and suppression. Among the many different factors<br />

that I describe throughout this work, the need to produce low budget films and be as<br />

creative within distinctive styles as possible contributed to the differentiation of product<br />

from that of the established A-films from the major studios. After the years of the<br />

Depression, a need to attract audiences back to the cinema was strongly felt, and thus Bfilm<br />

production as a part of <strong>do</strong>uble features exhibition became a calculated measure to<br />

redress the situation.<br />

As I explain in the chapter “Censorship and Politics”, film <strong>no</strong>ir is a form<br />

symptomatic of its own time and a reflection of production policies in both artistic and<br />

tech<strong>no</strong>logical terms. With the emergence of B-films in the market, they were soon<br />

perceived by filmmakers as a cheaper way of being different and as an opportunity to<br />

experiment with cinema techniques. The demands of wartime production, together with the<br />

ideological shift that embraced the controversial issues mentioned before, led filmmakers<br />

and film personnel to turn to the production of B-<strong>no</strong>irs, in stark contrast to other<br />

stan<strong>da</strong>rdised A-film forms which were much more in conformity with the requirements of<br />

the Motion Picture Production Code. On the other hand, in practical terms, the appearance<br />

of B-films <strong>no</strong>t only meant customers were able to watch two different movies for the price<br />

of one single entrance but film <strong>no</strong>ir also provided them with new sophisticated pleasures,<br />

with its generally masculine orientation, which would reveal itself to be successful in this<br />

changed context of reception.<br />

Film <strong>no</strong>ir became thus the form of choice for certain studio companies to survive<br />

and prosper by producing appealing adult entertainment throughout the forties. From the<br />

viewers’ perspective, this type of film challenged and unsettled the spectator,<br />

differentiating it from all other art forms. With this kind of complicit game at the emotional<br />

level, so to speak, the spectator obtains his or her satisfaction and pleasure mediated<br />

through a set of rules and conventions. We might enquire then why some studios<br />

manifested a dismissive attitude towards these films, while others were eager to maintain<br />

them. Part of the answer to this issue seems to be that this particular kind of alienation, with<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!