28.03.2013 Views

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

Joaquim da Silva Fontes, Significação e Estabilidade do Género no ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to these specific restrictions and see more clearly how they were observed and applied in<br />

certain cases.<br />

Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity may be taken as a fairly representative example to<br />

describe the practical effects of censorship. In the first version of the movie, insurance<br />

agent Neff (Fred MacMurray) was featured as being sent to a gas chamber which created<br />

some uneasiness among the members of the Breen office. It was declared that both the<br />

<strong>no</strong>vel and its cinematic treatment were most unsuitable 44 and so Wilder had to come up<br />

with a new ending. According to the director, Neff’s death was among “two of the best<br />

scenes I’ve ever shot in my whole life [the other being the original opening to Sunset<br />

Boulevard]”. It did <strong>no</strong>t take too long for Wilder to consider that an execution was perhaps<br />

“unnecessary” and so apart from a different ending, Billy Wilder was also obliged to take<br />

into account some other points and softened them to pass the sieve of censorship. For<br />

example, Neff <strong>do</strong>es <strong>no</strong>t commit suicide and only dies after confessing to a Dictaphone that<br />

he was the one who set up the whole scheme. Regarding the love scenes, as I have already<br />

mentioned elsewhere, directors had to camouflage them through the art of omission or<br />

recur to suggestive camera movements to ascribe certain meanings. In the case of Double<br />

Indemnity, the adulterous sequences had to be disguised so, for instance, when Phyllis<br />

visits Walter’s apartment and kisses him for the first time, he instantly lights up a cigarette,<br />

and gets ready to discuss the murder plan. The audience gets to infer, however, that they <strong>do</strong><br />

go to bed with each other while the rain falls on the bedroom win<strong>do</strong>ws. These scenes were<br />

then developed to ensure that the rule from the Code would be followed: “The sanctity of<br />

the institution of marriage and the home shall be upheld. Pictures shall <strong>no</strong>t infer that low<br />

forms of sex relationship are the accepted or common thing” (see p. 465). Adultery and<br />

illicit sex, although recognized as sometimes necessary to the plot, could <strong>no</strong>t be explicit or<br />

justified and were <strong>no</strong>t supposed to be presented as an attractive option. Cain’s quote from<br />

the introduction seems to make much sense here: “A studio can obey every one and be<br />

salacious” since by means of symbolism and ellipsis (we k<strong>no</strong>w that time has passed when<br />

Walter and Phyllis get together again after that scene back in the living room where he is<br />

seated at one end of the sofa smoking a cigarette, and she is retouching her makeup),<br />

Hollywood’s enforced morals could be preserved.<br />

44 The PCA established that the “whole sequence in the death chamber to be very questionable in its present<br />

form (…) specifically the details of the execution (…) are unduly gruesome to the Code.”<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!