28.03.2013 Views

Pathwalkers herb gardens - Gypsey Website

Pathwalkers herb gardens - Gypsey Website

Pathwalkers herb gardens - Gypsey Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PathWalkers.Net Interactive :: Helping you along your path<br />

argued with his wife and then separated. Later that ex-wife get pregnant from a snake,<br />

and later gave birth to some snakes. In one another case the snake had gone inside of a<br />

woman(and they used a lappish healer to try to get it out).<br />

Snakes had also a strong part of shamanism, but I don't know what really was the<br />

function of shamans snake-shape belongings(??instruments??). Finnish folkloristics seem<br />

to believe that the snake was for the shamans protection.<br />

We had few cases where a snake's head was used by magical meanings.<br />

Sixthly, in 1732 court was dealing with a case, where Lauri Heikinpoika Tervo accused<br />

his neighbor "of sending a bird with fire on its head (nose)" to burn his house, which<br />

burned. Due to losses of protocols, we don't know how the case was handled, but I'm<br />

sure the court did not find neighbor guilty. Birds have been known to used to carry fire in<br />

saami tradition (says finnish folklorist Aune Nystrom).<br />

Seventhly, we have found one case where a woman gave birth to some frogs, and one<br />

case where a frog was put in a box and buried inside of a church. The box was just like<br />

those boxes they used with human bodies.<br />

Eigth, we have a case where they used a fish to heal sick person. The idea was that the<br />

"Grande mal" (falling sickness) would be moved from people to fish. So they did it, but<br />

unfortunately one innocent person touched the fish and got himself sick. And of course<br />

the sickness was grande mal.<br />

Ninth, I have a strong feeling, that finnish courts did not tried to found out if the accused<br />

had animal helper or not. The law mentioned nothing about animal imps or spirituals, so<br />

they were not needed as evidence. Maleficium was maleficium and it could be proofed<br />

without any animal helpers or spirits.<br />

10th According the old folk tradition the bear will not harm the cattle if one takes a blind<br />

puppy dog and buries it with some rites in the land on area, where the bear lives. But I<br />

have no evidence that this has ever been done.<br />

11th In Finland was believed, that milking others cow, would steal not only the milk but<br />

the further milk lucky too. I think this believe is common in whole Scandinavia.<br />

12th A bear could be sent to harm neighbour's cattle. But at least in one case (1746)<br />

shows, that it could also to sent back to harm the original witch.<br />

13th I have no reason to believe that the animal (exept the bear or wolf sended to do<br />

harm) were real ones. If it was so that the helpers were real pets, why they did not<br />

execute the pets too?<br />

I think that the judges has sent the animals to death as they did with cases where humans<br />

had sexual intercourse with animal. They executed both! One reason to not to do so<br />

could be, that the animal was not "guilty" for anything because it could not differ the<br />

right and the wrong from each other. But so did the raped animal neither.<br />

14th The worms. At least in one case the witch used worms to destroy a pig. He used<br />

some magical technique and the victims pig get "full of worms" as they found out when<br />

http://www.pathwalkers.net/interactive/modules....ame=News&file=index&catid=1&topic=&allstories=1 (198 of 236) [12/25/2005 12:17:44 AM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!