From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
28.03.2013 Views

CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THEIR GAME they have to depend on brahmins for certain things. Although Jainism is a religion in revolt against Hinduism and is basically against brahminism, finally they had to make the compromise, because there were a thousand and one things they could not figure out without the brahmins. Now, who is going to make the birth chart? Jainas had no idea of astronomy, astrology, palmistry, so they had finally to negotiate. In marriage, who is going to do the rituals? – so the brahmin does it. And the mantras have to be recited – the brahmin has to do it. In death, who is going to recite the mantras when the fire is given to the body? – the brahmin has to do it. So finally the whole rebellion disappeared, and Jainism became just a sub-caste, a sub-religion, a branch of Hinduism – but philosophically they are enemies. Deep down, Jainas think they are higher and that they are simply hiring these brahmins for certain works as they hire other servants. Brahmins think that they are higher – ”Because without us you cannot even be born, you cannot die.” These pseudo-religions have created a chaos in you – that is very necessary for them. I have heard: One politician, one advocate, and one priest – three old friends – all had passed their seventieth year, but they used to go every morning for a walk and sit on a bench in the park and gossip about things which only they knew... the good old days. And many times arguments and discussions would start. One morning they started discussing whose profession was the first. The advocate said, ”There is no problem about it: my profession was the first profession in the world, because people were fighting and somebody was needed to mediate, to negotiate, to do justice, to be fair to both parties. So of course my profession came first.” The priest said, ”But do you know who started the fight? Without the priest, why should they be fighting? It is the priest who gives the basic ideas and creates antagonism in people’s minds. And once they get attached, infatuated with an idea, then they are ready to fight; otherwise why should they fight?” The politician laughed, he said, ”You both are right in a way, but you are not aware of the real situation. Why in the first place did people accept your ideas, your philosophies, theologies? – because of us. We created the will-to-power. Of course, the right idea is going to succeed, but we created the whole idea of success, power, of reaching somewhere, of attaining something, of being victorious.” Only when there is a will-to-power do you start getting interested in the ”right” kind of philosophy, the ”right” kind of theology, the ”right” kind of religion, so that you can reach the goal. And there are always many others who are saying, ”We are right – where are you going?” All the religions are saying, ”Except us, everybody is wrong. The pseudo-religions disturbed man, his inner integrity. They disturbed the society by creating so many fictitious ideologies. You will be surprised if you look into their ideologies and their theologies. You will laugh: How was it possible that great thinkers were concerned about these things? In the Middle Ages people like From Ignorance to Innocence 90 Osho

CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THEIR GAME Thomas Aquinas, a great theologian – perhaps the most important theologian amongst Christian theologians – was very much concerned about the problem of how many angels can stand on the point of a needle. Angels don’t have weight and they do not have physical bodies, but still there must be a limit – how many can stand there? Thomas Aquinas wastes many pages discussing how many angels can manage to stand there – and he was not alone. The whole Middle Ages remained concerned about the question. It was a great religious problem – of great urgency. I don’t know what urgency there could have been. Perhaps they were thinking that after they die, they would become angels and they would have to stand on the point of a pin or the point of a needle. What was the trouble? But that is the situation in all the theologies. Mahavira believed in seven hells and seven heavens. He was old by the time Gautam Buddha started moving about, teaching and impressing people. They had all heard Mahavira, and they would ask Buddha, ”Mahavira says so, what do you say?” Somebody asked, ”Mahavira says there are seven hells and seven heavens. What do you say?” Buddha said, ”He knows nothing. There are seventy-seven hells and seventy-seven heavens.” Now, there is nothing to prove and nothing to disprove it. It is up to you whom you want to believe. The same question was asked of Ajit Keshkambal, who was even younger than Buddha and was just entering the field of controversy. He said, ”These people are perfectly right. Up to the seventh, Mahavira is right; up the the seventy-seventh Buddha is right, but there are really seven hundred and seventy-seven hells and seven hundred and seventy-seven heavens – because I have explored the whole. Those poor people – about whatsoever they have explored they are not wrong, but if they insist that this is the end and that they have come to the very end, then they are wrong. If they say,’This is the point up to where we have reached,’ there is no problem.” Now Ajit Keshkambal was really a man with a tremendous sense of humor; he is just joking. But what is Buddha doing? – he is very serious; but to me that too seems to be a joke. What is Mahavira doing? – he is even more serious. But to be serious about such things.... You cannot give any proof, but you can create conflict in people. Now a few became Jainas, a few became Buddhists, and a few followed Ajit Keshkambal, but because he was a man with a great sense of humor, his religion disappeared; people want something serious and soon they realized that this man was not serious. How can you believe a man who is not serious? And in fact my own understanding is that Ajit Keshkambal was more sincere than the other two. He was simply making it a laughing matter, this theological business. He was saying, ”Get rid of all this nonsense! What business is it of yours to be bothered about?” So the pseudo-religions created chaos in individuals, they created chaos in society, and they exploited both. If there are Mohammedans, then Hindus remain united, then Christians remain united. It is just like the Soviet Union and America: nobody can stop making nuclear weapons, although both go on talking about peace. Nobody wants the third world war because everybody understands that it is going to finish everybody. It will be an absolutely idiotic war, if it ever happens, because a war only From Ignorance to Innocence 91 Osho

CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THEIR GAME<br />

they have <strong>to</strong> depend on brahmins for certain things. Although Jainism is a religion in revolt against<br />

Hinduism and is basically against brahminism, finally they had <strong>to</strong> make the <strong>com</strong>promise, because<br />

there were a thousand and one things they could not figure out without the brahmins.<br />

Now, who is going <strong>to</strong> make the birth chart? Jainas had no idea of astronomy, astrology, palmistry,<br />

so they had finally <strong>to</strong> negotiate. In marriage, who is going <strong>to</strong> do the rituals? – so the brahmin does<br />

it. And the mantras have <strong>to</strong> be recited – the brahmin has <strong>to</strong> do it. In death, who is going <strong>to</strong> recite the<br />

mantras when the fire is given <strong>to</strong> the body? – the brahmin has <strong>to</strong> do it.<br />

So finally the whole rebellion disappeared, and Jainism became just a sub-caste, a sub-religion,<br />

a branch of Hinduism – but philosophically they are enemies. Deep down, Jainas think they are<br />

higher and that they are simply hiring these brahmins for certain works as they hire other servants.<br />

Brahmins think that they are higher – ”Because without us you cannot even be born, you cannot<br />

die.”<br />

These pseudo-religions have created a chaos in you – that is very necessary for them.<br />

I have heard: One politician, one advocate, and one priest – three old friends – all had passed their<br />

seventieth year, but they used <strong>to</strong> go every morning for a walk and sit on a bench in the park and<br />

gossip about things which only they knew... the good old days. And many times arguments and<br />

discussions would start. One morning they started discussing whose profession was the first.<br />

The advocate said, ”There is no problem about it: my profession was the first profession in the world,<br />

because people were fighting and somebody was needed <strong>to</strong> mediate, <strong>to</strong> negotiate, <strong>to</strong> do justice, <strong>to</strong><br />

be fair <strong>to</strong> both parties. So of course my profession came first.”<br />

The priest said, ”But do you know who started the fight? Without the priest, why should they be<br />

fighting? It is the priest who gives the basic ideas and creates antagonism in people’s minds. And<br />

once they get attached, infatuated with an idea, then they are ready <strong>to</strong> fight; otherwise why should<br />

they fight?”<br />

The politician laughed, he said, ”You both are right in a way, but you are not aware of the real<br />

situation. Why in the first place did people accept your ideas, your philosophies, theologies? –<br />

because of us. We created the will-<strong>to</strong>-power. Of course, the right idea is going <strong>to</strong> succeed, but we<br />

created the whole idea of success, power, of reaching somewhere, of attaining something, of being<br />

vic<strong>to</strong>rious.”<br />

Only when there is a will-<strong>to</strong>-power do you start getting interested in the ”right” kind of philosophy,<br />

the ”right” kind of theology, the ”right” kind of religion, so that you can reach the goal. And there<br />

are always many others who are saying, ”We are right – where are you going?” All the religions are<br />

saying, ”Except us, everybody is wrong.<br />

The pseudo-religions disturbed man, his inner integrity. They disturbed the society by creating so<br />

many fictitious ideologies.<br />

You will be surprised if you look in<strong>to</strong> their ideologies and their theologies. You will laugh: How was<br />

it possible that great thinkers were concerned about these things? In the Middle Ages people like<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 90 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!