From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
28.03.2013 Views

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT? You have to live intensely and totally, wherever you are, whatever you are. And if you enjoy this time, this space, this opportunity that is available to you, to its totality, you will be certainly moving to a higher consciousness. You will be gaining, learning, understanding, becoming more aware. Life will continue. It will depend on your awareness what form it takes, higher or lower; whether it moves towards more anguish or more ecstasy – but it depends on this moment. So I am not saying to renounce this world. So I am a strange man in a way because I am against the religions. Religious people in India have been writing against me in books and articles – and communists have been writing books and articles against me too. Once I was traveling, and the president of India’s communist party, S.A. Dange, was also with me in the compartment. His son-in-law had just written a book against me. He asked me, ”Have you seen the book my son-in-law has written against you?” I said, ”I am so much involved in living that I don’t care who is writing what about me. And anybody who is writing about me must be a fool because he is wasting his time writing about me. He should live! Or even if he wants to write, he should write something about himself And why should I read his crap? He may be your son-in-law, so you can read it – i’m not interested.” He was ready to give me the book. I said, ”Throw it out of the window, because so many books have been written against me, I cannot waste my time.” I told him, ”Just for your information, it is strange but religious people write against me and anti-religious people, communists, also write against me. This has never happened before.” But the reason is that I am trying to give you a totally new viewpoint which goes against all the old logic. They are both partners in the same game, and I am trying to destroy their whole game – the whole logic. They both believe that one world has to be renounced; which one is another matter. But on one point they agree: one world has to be renounced. The religions say this for that; the communists say that for this – that is the only disagreement between them. But the basic logic is similar: you can have only one world. And I say: Why can’t we have both? I don’t see any conflict; I am having both! And my experience is that the more you have of this, the more you will have of that, because you will become more experienced. If there is a paradise, then one thing is certain: your monks will not be able to enjoy it there. What will they enjoy? The whole of their life they were denouncing women, condemning women, and there they will find beautiful callgirls. They will be so nervous that many of them will have heart attacks. Here they are renouncing: you should not eat food with taste, taste is an attachment to food – and there they will be served the most tasteful food. They will be vomiting! Their whole life experience will be against it. Only my people can enjoy paradise fully. Neither the religious people can enjoy it – because they have destroyed and crippled themselves and their capacity to enjoy – nor the communists, because they will not open their eyes. They have From Ignorance to Innocence 66 Osho

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT? denied the existence of anything after death. They will keep their eyes closed to remain convinced that there is nothing; otherwise their whole life’s philosophy is proved wrong. It is better to keep your eyes closed. That’s what people do: if anything goes against you, any fact, you try to avoid that fact – it is disturbing. Communists will go blind because they cannot accept the idea that Karl Marx is wrong and DAS KAPITAL is wrong. And the religious people will be the most troubled people in paradise; everywhere they will find difficulty. Perhaps there are divisions in paradise, as it seems.... Mohammedans’ paradise seems to be different from the Hindus, from the Christians, from the Jainas – perhaps different zones are allotted to different kinds of people. In the Mohammedan paradise there are rivers of wine. You drink as much as you want; swim, jump, drown yourself, whatsoever you want to do. But here, don’t touch wine. Now, this seems to be very illogical. Here these people should be trained for such a great experience or they will simply die! Sitting on the bank of a river where champagne is flowing, they cannot drink because of their past habits, their whole life’s training and discipline. And there is no description of any river which has water; in Mohammedan paradise all the rivers are wine. Why? When you can drink wine, why bother about water? So either they will die of thirst, or they will start drinking in spite of themselves. They will be really in a mess. Many of them will go mad: that what kind of reward is this? This is punishment! Only my people will be able to swim in any zone. In the Mohammedan zone they will not be worried, they will enjoy it. They will fit anywhere because they haven’t any fixed routine of living, a fixed style of living. All that I am teaching them is to remain flexible, free, open, available to new experiences, to new explorations. So my people are not going to remain in one zone. They are going to use all the zones and enjoy all the sights of paradise; nobody can prevent them. You can have both worlds – so why cripple people? Make this life an experience, a school, a learning, a discipline, because something unknown is going to open up after death and you have to be ready in every possible way. So don’t miss any opportunity of living. Who knows what kind of life you are going to have after death? I do not give you a fixed idea, because if I give you a fixed idea, I am your enemy; I make you a fixed person, inflexible, rigid, dead. Be flexible, so you can move in any dimension that becomes available. In my religion there is no place for renunciation. The Sanskrit word for renunciation is now sannyas, because renunciation became so important that the very word sannyas was used for it. But I have given it a new meaning. The people who have From Ignorance to Innocence 67 Osho

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT?<br />

You have <strong>to</strong> live intensely and <strong>to</strong>tally, wherever you are, whatever you are.<br />

And if you enjoy this time, this space, this opportunity that is available <strong>to</strong> you, <strong>to</strong> its <strong>to</strong>tality, you will be<br />

certainly moving <strong>to</strong> a higher consciousness. You will be gaining, learning, understanding, be<strong>com</strong>ing<br />

more aware. Life will continue. It will depend on your awareness what form it takes, higher or lower;<br />

whether it moves <strong>to</strong>wards more anguish or more ecstasy – but it depends on this moment. So I am<br />

not saying <strong>to</strong> renounce this world.<br />

So I am a strange man in a way because I am against the religions. Religious people in India<br />

have been writing against me in books and articles – and <strong>com</strong>munists have been writing books and<br />

articles against me <strong>to</strong>o.<br />

Once I was traveling, and the president of India’s <strong>com</strong>munist party, S.A. Dange, was also with me in<br />

the <strong>com</strong>partment. His son-in-law had just written a book against me. He asked me, ”Have you seen<br />

the book my son-in-law has written against you?”<br />

I said, ”I am so much involved in living that I don’t care who is writing what about me. And anybody<br />

who is writing about me must be a fool because he is wasting his time writing about me. He should<br />

live! Or even if he wants <strong>to</strong> write, he should write something about himself And why should I read his<br />

crap? He may be your son-in-law, so you can read it – i’m not interested.” He was ready <strong>to</strong> give me<br />

the book. I said, ”Throw it out of the window, because so many books have been written against me,<br />

I cannot waste my time.” I <strong>to</strong>ld him, ”Just for your information, it is strange but religious people write<br />

against me and anti-religious people, <strong>com</strong>munists, also write against me. This has never happened<br />

before.”<br />

But the reason is that I am trying <strong>to</strong> give you a <strong>to</strong>tally new viewpoint which goes against all the old<br />

logic. They are both partners in the same game, and I am trying <strong>to</strong> destroy their whole game – the<br />

whole logic.<br />

They both believe that one world has <strong>to</strong> be renounced; which one is another matter. But on one<br />

point they agree: one world has <strong>to</strong> be renounced. The religions say this for that; the <strong>com</strong>munists<br />

say that for this – that is the only disagreement between them. But the basic logic is similar: you<br />

can have only one world. And I say: Why can’t we have both? I don’t see any conflict; I am having<br />

both! And my experience is that the more you have of this, the more you will have of that, because<br />

you will be<strong>com</strong>e more experienced.<br />

If there is a paradise, then one thing is certain: your monks will not be able <strong>to</strong> enjoy it there. What will<br />

they enjoy? The whole of their life they were denouncing women, condemning women, and there<br />

they will find beautiful callgirls. They will be so nervous that many of them will have heart attacks.<br />

Here they are renouncing: you should not eat food with taste, taste is an attachment <strong>to</strong> food – and<br />

there they will be served the most tasteful food. They will be vomiting! Their whole life experience<br />

will be against it.<br />

Only my people can enjoy paradise fully.<br />

Neither the religious people can enjoy it – because they have destroyed and crippled themselves<br />

and their capacity <strong>to</strong> enjoy – nor the <strong>com</strong>munists, because they will not open their eyes. They have<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 66 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!