From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
28.03.2013 Views

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT? Now science is capable of destroying Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the whole world... but not really. It cannot destroy a single piece of stone. It cannot destroy it totally, it cannot annihilate it; it will still be there. You can break it into pieces but those pieces will be there. You can heat it as much as if you have brought the sun itself under it; it will melt, but it will be there. Yes, you can change the form, but there is no way to throw it out of existence. Nothing dies, nothing is born. Birth simply means that the form that you were was not this form, but some other form, so you cannot recognize it. You cannot recognize even pictures of you in your mother’s womb. If I show you a picture of your past life, are you going to recognize it? Forget about the mother’s womb, you may not be able to recognize the picture of when you were three months old, six months old, nine months old. Continuously, everything goes on changing. Death is a great transformation. You ask what is the place of renunciation in my religion. Before I answer you, there is one thing more to be noted: this idea of renunciation became so deeprooted in the whole of humanity that even the people who have denied the existence of life after death have also used the same logic. The logic became almost universal. For example, in India there was a school of atheists called charvakas. The word charvaka is worth understanding. Their enemies – and all the religions are enemies of Charvakas – have burned all their books so not a single book of the Charvakas is available. All that we know is from the scriptures of Hindus, Jainas and Buddhists criticizing Charvakas. So we can guess something of what those people were saying, but we cannot be absolutely certain. And these are all religious people, and they destroyed the Charvakas’ scriptures. Perhaps they have killed many of them also, because today there is not a single Charvaka in India. And all the scriptures are so much against the Charvakas that it seems they must have been a tremendous force once. Otherwise why criticize them when there is nobody who follows the philosophy? All three religions were continually hammering and arguing against the Charvakas. It must have been a very popular philosophy. And in fact, it is still a powerful philosophy all over the world, but because people are hypocrites, they don’t recognize it. Just listen to their philosophy and you will see that out of one hundred people, ninety-nine point nine percent are Charvakas. They may be Christians, they may be Hindus, they may be Mohammedans, it doesn’t matter; these are just their masks. So the enemy scriptures describe the meaning of the word charvaka: eat, drink, and be merry. In the enemy scriptures chanaka means one who believes in eating, eating, eating – through all the senses. I cannot say that any Charvakas have said it, but it is possible. The enemy scriptures quote Charvakas as saying, ”Even if you have to borrow money, don’t be worried, but drink, eat, be merry. Go on borrowing money, because after death neither are you there to pay, nor is there anybody else to ask you,’What about my money?’ Everything is finished with death, so don’t be bothered by these From Ignorance to Innocence 64 Osho

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT? priests telling you that you will suffer for your karmas. You enjoy yourself in every possible way. Don’t miss enjoyment. This is the only world.” This is the meaning given by the enemies, but in one enemy scripture – it must have been a very liberal person who wrote it – it says that this is the meaning given by the enemies, by us. But Charvakas themselves have a different meaning of their name. It means one who has a sweet philosophy – that meaning is possible from the same word – one who speaks words of honey. And certainly they do speak words of honey. But they also are trapped in the same logic. The religious people say, ”Renounce this world if you want to enjoy that world.” And Charvakas say, ”Renounce that world if you want to rejoice in this one.” But the logic is the same. They have taken it from different angles, but both are asking you to renounce one for the other. Charvakas say renounce the other world; there is no God, no nirvana, no paradise – renounce it. This is all there is – so enjoy it. Epicurus in Greece had the same philosophy and got caught up in the same logic. Even Karl Marx is caught up in the same logic: there is no other world. The first effort is to deny the other world, only then can you enjoy this world. So first demolish the other world: there is no God, no paradise, no heaven, nothing. There is no soul to survive; with your body everything dies. You are nothing but your body, your chemistry, your biology, your physiology, all together – a byproduct of all these things. It is just like the clock goes on working – it does not mean there is a soul which is moving the hands. Just take the pieces apart and you won’t find any soul, just a certain arrangement of the parts. Arrange it again, and it starts ticking. Karl Marx says, ”Consciousness is only a byproduct, it has no independent existence.” So when the body dies, consciousness disappears. Why this insistence on denying the other world? – for the simple reason that unless you deny the other, you will not be able to enjoy this. But please see my point of view which is totally different from all these people – the religious, the anti-religious, the theist, the atheist. I don’t belong to any of them. I say to you that life continues to exist, but there is no need to call it the other world. It is the same world, the same continuity. The Ganges comes out of the Himalayas; it is just a small rivulet. As it descends, other waterfalls, other rivulets go on joining it; it goes on becoming bigger and bigger and bigger. When it comes out of the Himalayas it is a vast river. You cannot conceive that it is the same river. You can see from where it arises. Because Hindus love the cow as the mother, they have made the origin of the Ganges a stone cow’s face. The Ganges falls through the face; it is so small, so tiny. By the time the Ganges reaches Benares, you cannot believe its size. And when it reaches near Calcutta to meet the ocean, it becomes almost oceanic itself. Standing there, you cannot decide which is the ocean; it is so vast. It falls into the ocean, then too it remains. Where can it go? Yes, it is no more a river – perhaps some water may evaporate into the clouds, some water may become ice and move towards the arctic – but it will remain, nothing is lost. So I don’t say that you have to renounce anything: this world for that, or that world for this. You have not to renounce at all. You have to live! From Ignorance to Innocence 65 Osho

CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW – WHY WAIT?<br />

priests telling you that you will suffer for your karmas. You enjoy yourself in every possible way. Don’t<br />

miss enjoyment. This is the only world.”<br />

This is the meaning given by the enemies, but in one enemy scripture – it must have been a very<br />

liberal person who wrote it – it says that this is the meaning given by the enemies, by us. But<br />

Charvakas themselves have a different meaning of their name. It means one who has a sweet<br />

philosophy – that meaning is possible from the same word – one who speaks words of honey. And<br />

certainly they do speak words of honey. But they also are trapped in the same logic.<br />

The religious people say, ”Renounce this world if you want <strong>to</strong> enjoy that world.” And Charvakas<br />

say, ”Renounce that world if you want <strong>to</strong> rejoice in this one.” But the logic is the same. They have<br />

taken it from different angles, but both are asking you <strong>to</strong> renounce one for the other. Charvakas say<br />

renounce the other world; there is no God, no nirvana, no paradise – renounce it. This is all there is<br />

– so enjoy it.<br />

Epicurus in Greece had the same philosophy and got caught up in the same logic. Even Karl Marx<br />

is caught up in the same logic: there is no other world. The first effort is <strong>to</strong> deny the other world,<br />

only then can you enjoy this world. So first demolish the other world: there is no God, no paradise,<br />

no heaven, nothing. There is no soul <strong>to</strong> survive; with your body everything dies. You are nothing<br />

but your body, your chemistry, your biology, your physiology, all <strong>to</strong>gether – a byproduct of all these<br />

things. It is just like the clock goes on working – it does not mean there is a soul which is moving<br />

the hands. Just take the pieces apart and you won’t find any soul, just a certain arrangement of the<br />

parts. Arrange it again, and it starts ticking.<br />

Karl Marx says, ”Consciousness is only a byproduct, it has no independent existence.” So when the<br />

body dies, consciousness disappears. Why this insistence on denying the other world? – for the<br />

simple reason that unless you deny the other, you will not be able <strong>to</strong> enjoy this.<br />

But please see my point of view which is <strong>to</strong>tally different from all these people – the religious, the<br />

anti-religious, the theist, the atheist. I don’t belong <strong>to</strong> any of them.<br />

I say <strong>to</strong> you that life continues <strong>to</strong> exist, but there is no need <strong>to</strong> call it the other world. It is the same<br />

world, the same continuity.<br />

The Ganges <strong>com</strong>es out of the Himalayas; it is just a small rivulet. As it descends, other waterfalls,<br />

other rivulets go on joining it; it goes on be<strong>com</strong>ing bigger and bigger and bigger. When it <strong>com</strong>es<br />

out of the Himalayas it is a vast river. You cannot conceive that it is the same river. You can see<br />

from where it arises. Because Hindus love the cow as the mother, they have made the origin of the<br />

Ganges a s<strong>to</strong>ne cow’s face. The Ganges falls through the face; it is so small, so tiny.<br />

By the time the Ganges reaches Benares, you cannot believe its size. And when it reaches near<br />

Calcutta <strong>to</strong> meet the ocean, it be<strong>com</strong>es almost oceanic itself. Standing there, you cannot decide<br />

which is the ocean; it is so vast. It falls in<strong>to</strong> the ocean, then <strong>to</strong>o it remains. Where can it go? Yes, it<br />

is no more a river – perhaps some water may evaporate in<strong>to</strong> the clouds, some water may be<strong>com</strong>e<br />

ice and move <strong>to</strong>wards the arctic – but it will remain, nothing is lost.<br />

So I don’t say that you have <strong>to</strong> renounce anything: this world for that, or that world for this. You have<br />

not <strong>to</strong> renounce at all. You have <strong>to</strong> live!<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 65 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!