28.03.2013 Views

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 28. SCIENCE PLUS RELIGION – THE DYNAMIC FORMULA FOR THE FUTURE<br />

He is a simple man. That’s why it is very difficult <strong>to</strong> find a religious man, because he will be so<br />

simple and so ordinary that you are going <strong>to</strong> miss him. He won’t have any talent. He will not be a<br />

Picasso, he will not be an Einstein, he will not be a Stalin; he won’t have any kind of talent. You will<br />

not be able <strong>to</strong> judge his genius because his genius is unobsessed, so he cannot produce science,<br />

he cannot produce new discoveries, new inventions.<br />

It is not just a coincidence that in the East, where religion has existed for at least ten thousand<br />

years.... And there have been a few authentically religious men. Of course there has not been yet<br />

an authentic religion; but here and there, once in a while, there have been authentic religious men.<br />

But the East has not been able <strong>to</strong> create science.<br />

Do you think Buddha had not the genius equivalent <strong>to</strong> Albert Einstein? He had a far bigger, higher,<br />

deeper genius than any Albert Einstein could ever have. But he is not obsessed, hence his genius<br />

does not move in one direction. His genius be<strong>com</strong>es a fragrance around him, be<strong>com</strong>es a light<br />

around him. Those who have eyes can see the light. Those who have ears can hear the music<br />

around him, can hear the silence that surrounds him... can smell the fragrance of the man.<br />

But Buddha is not going <strong>to</strong> invent a <strong>com</strong>puter. He is not obsessed; he is absolutely unobsessed.<br />

So you can feel his genius, but you cannot see it reflected in some objective achievement. What is<br />

his achievement? Far smaller people have achieved much more. He has not achieved anything, but<br />

he has been just himself. If you can call it an achievement, then call it achievement. But it is not<br />

achievement.<br />

What he is, he has always been. Achievement means something that was not there and now is<br />

there. But <strong>to</strong> realize oneself; <strong>to</strong> know oneself, is not <strong>to</strong> bring any new thing in<strong>to</strong> existence. It has<br />

been there; whether you know it or not doesn’t make any difference <strong>to</strong> its existence. It has been<br />

there. It is there. Yes, there was a time when you were keeping your back <strong>to</strong> it, and now you have<br />

taken a one-hundred-and-eighty-degree turn and you are facing it – but nothing new has <strong>com</strong>e in<strong>to</strong><br />

existence.<br />

You can feel that experience – yes, it is an experience. All that you need is <strong>to</strong> be receptive, available,<br />

open, because a man like Buddha cannot even knock on your doors: even that will be interfering<br />

with somebody else’s being.<br />

Buddha can stand before your doors and wait till eternity: someday you may open the door, someday<br />

you will invite him in. Without your invitation he is not going <strong>to</strong> <strong>com</strong>e in. There is not a question of<br />

ego. It is your house, you are the host, and unless you invite him it is not right <strong>to</strong> trespass on your<br />

privacy in any way.<br />

Buddha became enlightened – but for seven days he remained silent. And he gave many arguments<br />

why he remained silent for seven days; in fact he wanted <strong>to</strong> remain silent forever. Later on when he<br />

was asked again and again why he had remained silent for seven days and then had spoken, he<br />

said, ”Even <strong>to</strong> speak is <strong>to</strong> interfere; let the other understand the silence. And if he cannot understand<br />

the silence, do you think he will understand my words? Because my words will be far away from my<br />

silence. They won’t be representative. There is every possibility he may be misguided by my words,<br />

and I may be helpless <strong>to</strong> prevent it. In silence if somebody <strong>com</strong>es <strong>to</strong> me, he cannot misinterpret<br />

it. He may understand, he may not understand; there are only two possibilities, and I will not be<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 418 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!