28.03.2013 Views

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 26. MEDITATION: WATCHFULNESS, AWARENESS, ALERTNESS – THE REAL TRINITY<br />

rightly, the miracle is, once the dream is analyzed <strong>com</strong>pletely – that means you be<strong>com</strong>e aware of its<br />

reason, why it happens, why it is, of what it is constituted – once you be<strong>com</strong>e aware of a dream, its<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal structure, root and all, it disappears.<br />

To summarize: <strong>to</strong> be aware of a dream is the death of the dream.<br />

And after a few years of psychoanalysis when all your dreams slowly disappear.... Then Freud<br />

became aware that there is still another depth. He died before he could penetrate the other depth,<br />

but he had found it, discovered it: the unconscious.<br />

Jung tried <strong>to</strong> go as deep in<strong>to</strong> the unconscious as possible. It is easier in hypnosis <strong>to</strong> reach the<br />

unconscious of any person, very easy. Hence in the future hypnosis is going <strong>to</strong> be<strong>com</strong>e part and<br />

parcel of every psychology. In India it always has been, because three years of psychoanalysis is a<br />

wastage of time. Within three minutes you can be hypnotized and all your dreaming process can be<br />

put aside; then there is direct entry in<strong>to</strong> the unconscious.<br />

Because Jung was interested in hypnosis, Freud condemned him as unscientific. It is not right.<br />

Hypnosis is a scientific method of digging deep in<strong>to</strong> you. And when Jung tried <strong>to</strong> go deep in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

unconscious, there is still another layer: the collective unconscious, the unconscious of the whole<br />

humanity.<br />

Everybody has it; and sometimes from that collective unconscious you get ideas, but because they<br />

<strong>com</strong>e from so far away from your conscious, you think that they are <strong>com</strong>ing from somewhere outside<br />

you. When Jesus hears the voice of God, it is not God speaking, it is the collective unconscious.<br />

But it is so far away that poor Jesus can be forgiven. He simply is mistaken, and he had no idea that<br />

there are depths within depths depths behind depths.<br />

This collective unconscious is <strong>to</strong> do with the mythological. Hence, Jung became interested in<br />

mythology <strong>to</strong> discover its existence, just as Freud became interested in dreams <strong>to</strong> discover the<br />

existence of the subconscious. Mythologies are dreams dreamed by the whole of humanity over<br />

thousands of years, but those mythologies carry some idea, some significance. For example,<br />

the Indian mythology that life for the first time appeared as a fish. The first incarnation of God is<br />

matsyavatar: incarnation as a fish. A strange mythology – how did they figure it out?<br />

Out of this vast world of animals, why did they fall upon the fish? – some indication from their<br />

collective unconscious. Now science says that perhaps life was born first in the ocean. It <strong>com</strong>es<br />

very close <strong>to</strong> the fish. And the child in the beginning, in the mother’s womb, looks like a fish. He<br />

moves from there and passes through all the stages that man has passed through in millions of<br />

years – there is a point where he looks like a monkey.<br />

Jung’s discovery of mythology and its connection with the collective unconscious is of immense<br />

importance. But he s<strong>to</strong>pped there because he was afraid, and obsessed with death, just as Sigmund<br />

Freud was himself obsessed with sex. Anything you brought <strong>to</strong> him – I say anything, and I mean<br />

anything – he would immediately manage <strong>to</strong> make it sexual. Whatever it was, it did not matter; he<br />

was capable of making it sexual.<br />

Freud’s whole mind was focused on one point; but perhaps that’s the only way. In a small life, what<br />

can a man do? If he can work out only one idea in its <strong>to</strong>tality, then he needs <strong>to</strong> be obsessed;<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 385 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!