From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
28.03.2013 Views

CHAPTER 26. MEDITATION: WATCHFULNESS, AWARENESS, ALERTNESS – THE REAL TRINITY But if you can remember – even as a memory – some moments in your life when suddenly you were more aware than you usually are, it will be a great help to understand what I am going to say to you. I have told you that modern psychology has moved below the so-called human consciousness. And when people like Sigmund Freud found that just underneath your thin layer of consciousness there is another layer, it was a great discovery for him, and for the West. And his whole life he devoted to exploring the underground, the basement of your consciousness. That’s why he became interested in the analysis of dreams, because when you are conscious you can pretend, you can be a hypocrite. You can say something that you don’t mean, you can do something that you never wanted to do. You can smile, and inside you want to cry, weep. You can cry and weep, and inside you are enjoying, you are rejoicing. So your consciousness has been so polluted by the society, it is not reliable. This was one of the most significant contributions of Sigmund Freud: that your consciousness is not reliable. Strange, that he feels your unconsciousness is more reliable than your consciousness. Nothing can be a greater condemnation of the whole human civilization, the whole human history of all the religions. What else can be a greater condemnation than this: that your consciousness is not reliable; that your society, your tradition, your religion, your convention, have made it unreliable. In one of Kahlil Gibran’s stories, the mother and her daughter are both sleepwalkers. The daughter one night walks in her sleep, goes into the garden and starts saying nasty things about her mother. And just by accident her mother also sleepwalks behind her and starts saying ugly things about her. But the cold wind outside suddenly wakes them both. And the daughter says, ”Mum, you don’t have anything warm around you, you should not come out at your age. You make me so worried.” And the mother says, ”My beloved daughter, in this whole world there is nobody except you whom I can call mine.” This much is the story, but it contains the whole discovery of Sigmund Freud: while they were asleep they were saying really what they feel about each other. When they wake up they are saying what they are supposed to say to each other. And they will not become aware of their two sides. And if there were only two sides things would have been far easier, but there are many more sides. I have told you – it will be good to be reminded – consciousness is a very thin layer where we are existing. Below it is the subconscious mind; that is half-conscious, half-unconscious. That’s why you remember dreams only of the later part of the night. You don’t remember all your dreams from the whole night because in eight hours of sleep, for six hours you are dreaming. Now this is a scientifically proved fact. Only here and there for a few minutes you fall into deeper sleep where dreams are no more; the total is two hours. But the dream total is six hours. You don’t remember in the morning six hours’ dreams – almost the length of three movies. At the most you remember some fragment, or sometimes a whole dream, but that dream was the last dream when you were waking up. From Ignorance to Innocence 374 Osho

CHAPTER 26. MEDITATION: WATCHFULNESS, AWARENESS, ALERTNESS – THE REAL TRINITY The subconscious mind has two sides. One is connected with the unconscious, the bottom part. When you are deeply asleep, dreams are moving at the bottom part of the subconscious. The conscious is very far away. But when you are waking up in the morning, you are coming closer to the conscious mind, then the top layer of the subconscious is dreaming. That’s why your consciousness can hear little bits and pieces of dreaming, and in the morning you can remember something. But that is only the tail of the elephant. The whole elephant has disappeared, you have no notion of it. And of course the tail makes no sense because the elephant is not there. Hence the psychoanalyst is needed to find out the elephant: what kind of elephant it was, whether it was an elephant or a camel or a cow or a horse, because you have only a tail – perhaps not even the whole tail, a few hairs of the tail. The whole function of psychoanalysis is to put those hairs together and to figure out whose tail this can be; to dig you from this corner and from that corner, and hit you from this point and that point, so something comes up which is there, but of which you are not aware. The psychologist almost makes the whole animal on the basis of the few hairs of the tail. That’s why there are so many schools of psychoanalysis. It was bound to be so. Sigmund Freud wanted psychoanalysis to remain one integrated movement. It was impossible, because the work of the psychoanalyst is more or less imagination: he has a few things in his hand but those things can lead to any conclusion. If you go to Sigmund Freud then those same hairs will prove you are sexually obsessed: that is his elephant. And once he has found the elephant you will start seeing according to his vision, and you will find explanations that perhaps he is right. And perhaps he is right. If you go to Adler, he has a different kind of imagination: will-to-power. For Sigmund Freud it is will-to-sex, will-to-reproduction. To Sigmund Freud it is more of a biological phenomenon than to Adler. To Adler it is more of a political phenomenon: will-to-power. If you take the same hairs to Sigmund Freud he will manage to figure out and discover perversions of sex in you. And I am saying perhaps he is right, and I also want to say perhaps Adler is also right. If you go to Jung then he will find through those same hairs some mythological phenomenon. It will not be biological, it will not be political, it will be mythological. And I want to say: perhaps he is also right. All these three continually quarreled, not knowing that man’s mind has multi-aspects, that it is not exhausted by one explanation, that not only are there these three, there are more possibilities. Just a few more Freuds, Jungs and Adlers are needed who have some poetic imagination, and some scientific way of explanation. Man’s mind is multidimensional. And every dimension is connected. From Ignorance to Innocence 375 Osho

CHAPTER 26. MEDITATION: WATCHFULNESS, AWARENESS, ALERTNESS – THE REAL TRINITY<br />

But if you can remember – even as a memory – some moments in your life when suddenly you were<br />

more aware than you usually are, it will be a great help <strong>to</strong> understand what I am going <strong>to</strong> say <strong>to</strong> you.<br />

I have <strong>to</strong>ld you that modern psychology has moved below the so-called human consciousness. And<br />

when people like Sigmund Freud found that just underneath your thin layer of consciousness there<br />

is another layer, it was a great discovery for him, and for the West. And his whole life he devoted <strong>to</strong><br />

exploring the underground, the basement of your consciousness.<br />

That’s why he became interested in the analysis of dreams, because when you are conscious you<br />

can pretend, you can be a hypocrite. You can say something that you don’t mean, you can do<br />

something that you never wanted <strong>to</strong> do. You can smile, and inside you want <strong>to</strong> cry, weep. You can<br />

cry and weep, and inside you are enjoying, you are rejoicing.<br />

So your consciousness has been so polluted by the society, it is not reliable. This was one of the<br />

most significant contributions of Sigmund Freud: that your consciousness is not reliable. Strange,<br />

that he feels your unconsciousness is more reliable than your consciousness.<br />

Nothing can be a greater condemnation of the whole human civilization, the whole human his<strong>to</strong>ry of<br />

all the religions.<br />

What else can be a greater condemnation than this: that your consciousness is not reliable; that<br />

your society, your tradition, your religion, your convention, have made it unreliable.<br />

In one of Kahlil Gibran’s s<strong>to</strong>ries, the mother and her daughter are both sleepwalkers. The daughter<br />

one night walks in her sleep, goes in<strong>to</strong> the garden and starts saying nasty things about her mother.<br />

And just by accident her mother also sleepwalks behind her and starts saying ugly things about her.<br />

But the cold wind outside suddenly wakes them both. And the daughter says, ”Mum, you don’t have<br />

anything warm around you, you should not <strong>com</strong>e out at your age. You make me so worried.”<br />

And the mother says, ”My beloved daughter, in this whole world there is nobody except you whom I<br />

can call mine.”<br />

This much is the s<strong>to</strong>ry, but it contains the whole discovery of Sigmund Freud: while they were asleep<br />

they were saying really what they feel about each other. When they wake up they are saying what<br />

they are supposed <strong>to</strong> say <strong>to</strong> each other. And they will not be<strong>com</strong>e aware of their two sides.<br />

And if there were only two sides things would have been far easier, but there are many more sides.<br />

I have <strong>to</strong>ld you – it will be good <strong>to</strong> be reminded – consciousness is a very thin layer where we are<br />

existing. Below it is the subconscious mind; that is half-conscious, half-unconscious. That’s why you<br />

remember dreams only of the later part of the night. You don’t remember all your dreams from the<br />

whole night because in eight hours of sleep, for six hours you are dreaming.<br />

Now this is a scientifically proved fact. Only here and there for a few minutes you fall in<strong>to</strong> deeper<br />

sleep where dreams are no more; the <strong>to</strong>tal is two hours. But the dream <strong>to</strong>tal is six hours. You don’t<br />

remember in the morning six hours’ dreams – almost the length of three movies. At the most you<br />

remember some fragment, or sometimes a whole dream, but that dream was the last dream when<br />

you were waking up.<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 374 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!