From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MASOCHIST’S SLAP-UP FEAST other cheek. But his tastes may be different. He may have enjoyed the first hit, he may enjoy the second even more; he may be a sadist. Then you are encouraging a sadist to torture people; you are encouraging violence. Even to allow your own body to be tortured by somebody is to encourage violence. No, this stupid ideology has been the downfall of the whole of India. After Buddha and Mahavira, India never again became the same golden bird it was. After Buddha and Mahavira begins the downfall. Buddha and Mahavira are absolutely responsible for twenty-five centuries of slavery in India, because they taught people to be non-violent. They completely forgot that the other people surrounding the country are not non-violent. You are encouraging those people, inviting them: ”Come and be violent to us.” That’s actually what has happened in Indian history for twenty-five centuries. Anybody who wanted riches, women, slaves, invaded India. There was no trouble, India was non-violent. Most probably they would pass through kingdoms and there would be no fight at all, no resistance even. If you look at your non-violence and it has provoked violence, then what kind of non-violence is this? It has brought more violence in the world than there was before. Before Buddha and Mahavira, India was never invaded. There had never been any violence because people knew that to invade India was to just invite your death. But after Buddha and Mahavira’s teachings people became just like butter – you just cut into them with your knife, and there would be no noise at all. And millions of people were killed, burned without any resistance, because resistance would be violence. But you go on missing seeing the point that you are provoking the violence in the other person. Who is responsible for it? Now turning the other cheek means you are telling the other person, ”Please hit me a little more, it is not enough; I am not satisfied. Hit me a little more so that I can become a little more saintly.” And you have only two cheeks. What are you going to do when he has hit you on your second cheek? What Jesus is saying looks a beautiful statement but it is not at all practical, pragmatic, scientific. Reverence for life approaches the whole problem from a different angle. I will say respect life, yours included. In fact, you are first to be respectful towards yourself, then only can you be respectful towards anybody else. Be loving towards yourself, then you will be able to love others too. Reverence for life will not allow any provocation to violence. It will not start violence, but if anybody starts it, it will stop it immediately. Jesus says, ”If somebody hits you on one of your cheeks, turn the other cheek.” I say, ”Okay, turn his other cheek – and hit him harder. Give him a lesson! Make it clear to him that it is not so easy to hit somebody on the cheek – that it comes back, and comes back harder. And if you are capable, hit both his cheeks at the same time. Why give him the chance to turn the other cheek and become From Ignorance to Innocence 26 Osho
CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MASOCHIST’S SLAP-UP FEAST a saint? Hit him and tell him simultaneously,’I do not believe in violence, hence I have to stop it at the first chance. And remember that you cannot just be violent without being prevented.’” You have to prevent violence if you respect life. And in another way too, it is respectful to hit the man, not to give him your other cheek, because that is very disrespectful. This may seem a little difficult for you: you hit me, and I don’t hit you but show my other cheek to you, and say, ”Please be kind enough to hit me.” I am trying to be superhuman and reduce you below humanity. I am humiliating you far more than I can humiliate you by hitting you. By hitting you I simply declare you are human, I am human, and I speak the same language that you speak. We are both on the same ground. This is more respectful because you are not raising yourself higher; you are keeping yourself on the same ground as the other man. You are telling him, ”You are my brother; if you hit me you are going to get a bigger hit. Be watchful and be careful, because somewhere you may get into real trouble.” I am not in favor of your being superior to the other man. That’s what Jesus is saying: ”Be meek, be humble, turn the other cheek, because then you will inherit the kingdom of God.” I am not promising you any kingdom of God. You are not going to inherit anything. You have already inherited it – that is your life. Be loving and respectful to it. Be loving and respectful to others. But don’t try to be superior and higher and above others. Don’t put the other man down. In that sentence of Jesus you don’t find it, but it is there – that you are humiliating the other. You are creating guilt in the other. He will think it over at home, ”What did I do? What kind of man was he? I hit him, and he gave me the other cheek. How cruel and how animal I am that I again hit him on the other cheek.” He will not be able to sleep the whole night. He will come back tomorrow. The first thing he will want is to be forgiven. But to forgive him is again to put him down. No, I will say if he hits you, just be a sportsman. Don’t try to be a superman, just a sportsman. Hit him really hard and tell him, ”Whenever you need a good hit, you can always depend on me.” Never do any harm to anybody, but never allow anybody to do any harm to you either; only then can we create a human world. We have tried the other way in India, and the experiment has completely failed. Twenty-five centuries of slavery, slaughter, rape, and still nobody raises a finger and says that Buddha and Mahavira are responsible for it. They created this impotence in the whole country, this weakness in the whole country. No, I am not in favor of creating impotence, slavery, and provoking people to do violence to you. Never do violence of your own accord, but never allow anybody else to do it to you either. Only then is there a possibility of creating a human world. From Ignorance to Innocence 27 Osho
- Page 1 and 2: From Ignorance to Innocence Answers
- Page 3 and 4: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 5 and 6: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 7 and 8: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER 1. PSEUDO-RELIGION: THE STI
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MAS
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MAS
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MAS
- Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MAS
- Page 25: CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MAS
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 3. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY - THE
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK Th
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK no
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK Th
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK bi
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK da
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK th
- Page 55 and 56: 3 December 1984 pm in Lao Tzu Grove
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER 6 Renunciation: mortgage to
- Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
CHAPTER 2. THE OTHER CHEEK: THE MASOCHIST’S SLAP-UP FEAST<br />
other cheek. But his tastes may be different. He may have enjoyed the first hit, he may enjoy the<br />
second even more; he may be a sadist. Then you are encouraging a sadist <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>rture people; you<br />
are encouraging violence. Even <strong>to</strong> allow your own body <strong>to</strong> be <strong>to</strong>rtured by somebody is <strong>to</strong> encourage<br />
violence.<br />
No, this stupid ideology has been the downfall of the whole of India.<br />
After Buddha and Mahavira, India never again became the same golden bird it was.<br />
After Buddha and Mahavira begins the downfall. Buddha and Mahavira are absolutely responsible<br />
for twenty-five centuries of slavery in India, because they taught people <strong>to</strong> be non-violent. They<br />
<strong>com</strong>pletely forgot that the other people surrounding the country are not non-violent. You are<br />
encouraging those people, inviting them: ”Come and be violent <strong>to</strong> us.” That’s actually what has<br />
happened in Indian his<strong>to</strong>ry for twenty-five centuries. Anybody who wanted riches, women, slaves,<br />
invaded India. There was no trouble, India was non-violent. Most probably they would pass through<br />
kingdoms and there would be no fight at all, no resistance even.<br />
If you look at your non-violence and it has provoked violence, then what kind of non-violence is this?<br />
It has brought more violence in the world than there was before. Before Buddha and Mahavira, India<br />
was never invaded. There had never been any violence because people knew that <strong>to</strong> invade India<br />
was <strong>to</strong> just invite your death. But after Buddha and Mahavira’s teachings people became just like<br />
butter – you just cut in<strong>to</strong> them with your knife, and there would be no noise at all. And millions of<br />
people were killed, burned without any resistance, because resistance would be violence.<br />
But you go on missing seeing the point that you are provoking the violence in the other person. Who<br />
is responsible for it? Now turning the other cheek means you are telling the other person, ”Please<br />
hit me a little more, it is not enough; I am not satisfied. Hit me a little more so that I can be<strong>com</strong>e a<br />
little more saintly.” And you have only two cheeks. What are you going <strong>to</strong> do when he has hit you<br />
on your second cheek? What Jesus is saying looks a beautiful statement but it is not at all practical,<br />
pragmatic, scientific.<br />
Reverence for life approaches the whole problem from a different angle.<br />
I will say respect life, yours included.<br />
In fact, you are first <strong>to</strong> be respectful <strong>to</strong>wards yourself, then only can you be respectful <strong>to</strong>wards<br />
anybody else.<br />
Be loving <strong>to</strong>wards yourself, then you will be able <strong>to</strong> love others <strong>to</strong>o.<br />
Reverence for life will not allow any provocation <strong>to</strong> violence. It will not start violence, but if anybody<br />
starts it, it will s<strong>to</strong>p it immediately.<br />
Jesus says, ”If somebody hits you on one of your cheeks, turn the other cheek.” I say, ”Okay, turn<br />
his other cheek – and hit him harder. Give him a lesson! Make it clear <strong>to</strong> him that it is not so easy<br />
<strong>to</strong> hit somebody on the cheek – that it <strong>com</strong>es back, and <strong>com</strong>es back harder. And if you are capable,<br />
hit both his cheeks at the same time. Why give him the chance <strong>to</strong> turn the other cheek and be<strong>com</strong>e<br />
<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 26 <strong>Osho</strong>