28.03.2013 Views

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS RELIGION<br />

Now suddenly their interest is in non-violence: abortion is violence. And the same pope’s<br />

predecessors blessed Beni<strong>to</strong> Mussolini in the second world war. That was not violence? The<br />

archbishop of Canterbury in England blessed the British forces – and that was not violence? – that<br />

was perfectly good? One wonders at what point abortion be<strong>com</strong>es violence.<br />

At what point...? A child is conceived this moment – is he alive or dead? He is alive, but from where<br />

has the life <strong>com</strong>e? He was alive in the semen cells before he became conceived in the mother’s<br />

womb; the semen cells are all alive. They have a small life span, just two hours, so if within two<br />

hours they can find a female egg, and can enter the egg, the child is conceived. The egg is alive:<br />

half of your being, the feminine part, is in the egg, and half of your being is <strong>com</strong>ing from your father’s<br />

semen. And in a single intercourse millions of cells are rushing along....<br />

You will be surprised <strong>to</strong> know that it is there that politics starts. Everybody is running fast <strong>to</strong>wards<br />

the egg, because whosoever reaches first be<strong>com</strong>es President Reagan. Those who are left behind,<br />

just a little behind... finished! Only one sperm is going <strong>to</strong> enter, then the woman’s egg be<strong>com</strong>es hard<br />

and no more can enter. That is the natural process; it is vulnerable only <strong>to</strong> one. Only once in a while<br />

does it happen that two male cells reach exactly at the same time and enter. That’s why sometimes<br />

you have twins, or three or four or five or six – even nine children have been known. But that is a<br />

very rare event.<br />

Millions of sperms... and they are really fast. It is almost like a car race. They are all racing, and they<br />

have <strong>to</strong> be quick: within two hours if they don’t reach, they are finished. In a single intercourse you<br />

are responsible for killing millions of beings. And what about an abortion? – just one. So whether<br />

it’s one million or one million plus one, what difference does it make?<br />

But the Catholic pope is ready, just as the Mohammedan chief imam is ready, and the Hindu<br />

shankaracharya is ready <strong>to</strong> let the population grow, because numbers have a political significance.<br />

It is the politics of numbers – how many Catholics are there. The pope is not interested in humanity,<br />

in the future, in a global suicide, no. His whole interest is in how many Catholics there are: the more<br />

Catholics, the more power he has. The shankaracharya is interested in more Hindus, so he has<br />

more power.<br />

Everybody is interested in power.<br />

In the name of God they are simply trying <strong>to</strong> be<strong>com</strong>e more and more powerful.<br />

God is just a useful instrument in the hands of the priest. Whatsoever the priest wants, he makes<br />

God say: he writes the scriptures, he writes all kinds of nonsense in them.... And it is a strange fact<br />

<strong>to</strong> be unders<strong>to</strong>od about human beings, that people be<strong>com</strong>e very impressed with nonsense, because<br />

it seems mystical.<br />

For example the Bible says: ”In the beginning was the word....” Now how can the word be in the<br />

beginning? Do you make any distinction between sound and word, or not? A word is a meaningful<br />

sound. Perhaps it can be said that in the beginning there was sound – but not word.<br />

A word presupposes there was somebody who made the sound meaningful, who used a word. ”In<br />

the beginning was the word....”1 am just saying hypothetically that sound would be better, more<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 118 <strong>Osho</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!