From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com From Ignorance to Innocence - Osho - Oshorajneesh.com
CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BUT A PROBLEM Evolution implies that creation is not complete, hence the possibility of evolving. But God cannot create an incomplete world; that will be going against God’s nature. He is perfect, and whatsoever He does is perfect, neither He is evolving, nor is the world evolving: everything is at a standstill, dead. This is the reason why the popes were against Charles Darwin, because that man was bringing in an idea which is going to kill God sooner or later. Those popes were perceptive in a way: they could see the faraway implications of the idea of evolution. Ordinarily you would not connect creation and evolution. What connection is there between God and Charles Darwin? There is a connection. Charles Darwin is saying that the creation is an ongoing process, that existence is always imperfect, that it is never going to be perfect; only then can it go on evolving, reaching new peaks, new dimensions, opening new doors, new possibilities. God had finished His work in six days and not long ago: four thousand and four years before Jesus Christ was born. It must have been the first of January, a Monday, because we manage to fit God into everything that we have created. He has to follow our calendar. If you ask me, I will say it must have been Monday, the first of April, April Fools’ Day, because that day seems to be absolutely suitable for doing such an act of creating a complete ready-made existence. If evolution becomes impossible, life loses all meaning, life loses all future; then it has only a past. It is not unnatural that religious people are constantly past-oriented – they have only the past. Everything has been already done; there is nothing to be done in the future, the future is empty, blank, and yet you have to live in that future. Everything that had to happen happened four thousand and four years before Jesus was born. After that there has been no addition, no evolution, no development. God created the world just as a potter creates a pot, a dead thing out of mud. But you have to remember, the potter can destroy the pot any moment. If you give the power of creation to God, you are simultaneously giving Him the power of un-creation too. These are the implications that have not been looked into. God can un-create. April Fools’ Day comes every year; any year on the first of April He can un-create. At the very most it may take six days again. The very idea that you have been created makes you a thing, it takes away your being. You can be a being only if there is no God. God and you as a being, cannot coexist. That’s why I say I am sure God does not exist, because I see beings everywhere. The presence of beings is enough proof that God does not exist, cannot exist. Either you can exist or God can exist; you both cannot exist. The person who starts believing in God, unknowingly is losing his beinghood; he is becoming a thing. So there are Christian things, Hindu things, Mohammedan things, but not beings. They have dropped their being of their own accord; they have given their being to God. The fiction has become alive, and the alive has become a fiction. I am simply putting things right side up. From Ignorance to Innocence 100 Osho
CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BUT A PROBLEM When I say God does not exist, I have no grudge against God. I don’t care a bit about God, whether He exists or not – it is none of my business. When I say God does not exist, my purpose is to give you your lost beinghood; to show you that you are not a thing created by somebody arbitrarily. Why did He decide, on a certain day, four thousand and four years before Jesus was born, to create the world? What caused the idea of creation? Was there something else that was forcing Him to create? Was there some serpent seducing Him to create? Why on a certain day, and not before? I want you to see the point. It is arbitrary, whimsical. If the story is true, God is insane. What was He doing for the whole of eternity? – the idea of creation came so late to Him. The very idea of creation makes us arbitrary, whimsical, whereas evolution is not arbitrary, whimsical. Evolution is eternal; it has been always going on. There was not a time when existence was not, there will never be a time when existence will not be: Existence means eternity. God makes everything silly, small, arbitrary, meaningless, whimsical. Just that old man... and He must have been really old, really, really old, and then this idea of creation came to Him... and in six days He completed it. That’s why the popes were against Charles Darwin: ”You are saying that it is not yet completed, it is evolving. You are against the Bible, the holy scriptures. You are against God, against the idea of creation.” Charles Darwin was saying simply, ”I am not against any God, I don’t know any God.” He was a very fearful person, and he was a Christian. He used to pray; in fact he started to pray more after he wrote the theory of evolution. He became very much afraid: who knows, perhaps he was doing something against God. He had believed that God created the world, but the facts of nature were telling a different story – everything is evolving, life is never the same again. So if anybody believes in God, he cannot believe that you are a being. Only things are created; they have a beginning and an end – beings are eternal. Because of this fact, two religions in India, Jainism and Buddhism, dropped the idea of God – because to keep that idea simply meant you were dropping the idea of being, which is far more significant. They would have liked to keep both, but it was logically impossible. Once you accept that you have been created, you accept the other part of it, that the same whimsical man, any day, can un-create you. So what meaning do you have? – just a toy in the hands of some magical old man? So whenever He wants, He plays with the toys, and whenever He wants, He destroys them? It was really a great, courageous step on the part of Mahavira and Buddha to choose being and drop the idea of God – and that too, twenty-five centuries ago. They could simply see that you cannot manage both; they are against each other. But they were not aware of evolution; that was a later development. Now we know that creation goes against the idea of evolution too. From Ignorance to Innocence 101 Osho
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK bi
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK da
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 4. DANGER: TRUTH AT WORK th
- Page 55 and 56: 3 December 1984 pm in Lao Tzu Grove
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 5. ECSTASY IS NOW - WHY WAI
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER 6 Renunciation: mortgage to
- Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 6. RENUNCIATION: MORTGAGE T
- Page 85 and 86: 5 December 1984 pm in Lao Tzu Grove
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 7. SHAME IS THE NAME OF THE
- Page 99: 6 December 1984 pm in Lao Tzu Grove
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BU
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BU
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BU
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BU
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 113 and 114: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 119 and 120: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 123 and 124: CHAPTER 9. I TEACH A RELIGIONLESS R
- Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 127 and 128: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 129 and 130: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 131 and 132: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 135 and 136: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 137 and 138: CHAPTER 10. GOD - THE NOBODY EVERYB
- Page 139 and 140: 9 December 1984 pm in Lao Tzu Grove
- Page 141 and 142: CHAPTER 11. TRUTH: NOT A DOGMA BUT
- Page 143 and 144: CHAPTER 11. TRUTH: NOT A DOGMA BUT
- Page 145 and 146: CHAPTER 11. TRUTH: NOT A DOGMA BUT
- Page 147 and 148: CHAPTER 11. TRUTH: NOT A DOGMA BUT
- Page 149 and 150: CHAPTER 11. TRUTH: NOT A DOGMA BUT
CHAPTER 8. GOD IS NOT A SOLUTION BUT A PROBLEM<br />
When I say God does not exist, I have no grudge against God. I don’t care a bit about God, whether<br />
He exists or not – it is none of my business.<br />
When I say God does not exist, my purpose is <strong>to</strong> give you your lost beinghood; <strong>to</strong> show you that you<br />
are not a thing created by somebody arbitrarily.<br />
Why did He decide, on a certain day, four thousand and four years before Jesus was born, <strong>to</strong> create<br />
the world? What caused the idea of creation? Was there something else that was forcing Him <strong>to</strong><br />
create? Was there some serpent seducing Him <strong>to</strong> create? Why on a certain day, and not before? I<br />
want you <strong>to</strong> see the point. It is arbitrary, whimsical. If the s<strong>to</strong>ry is true, God is insane. What was He<br />
doing for the whole of eternity? – the idea of creation came so late <strong>to</strong> Him.<br />
The very idea of creation makes us arbitrary, whimsical, whereas evolution is not arbitrary, whimsical.<br />
Evolution is eternal; it has been always going on. There was not a time when existence was not,<br />
there will never be a time when existence will not be:<br />
Existence means eternity.<br />
God makes everything silly, small, arbitrary, meaningless, whimsical. Just that old man... and He<br />
must have been really old, really, really old, and then this idea of creation came <strong>to</strong> Him... and in six<br />
days He <strong>com</strong>pleted it. That’s why the popes were against Charles Darwin: ”You are saying that it is<br />
not yet <strong>com</strong>pleted, it is evolving. You are against the Bible, the holy scriptures. You are against God,<br />
against the idea of creation.”<br />
Charles Darwin was saying simply, ”I am not against any God, I don’t know any God.” He was a<br />
very fearful person, and he was a Christian. He used <strong>to</strong> pray; in fact he started <strong>to</strong> pray more after<br />
he wrote the theory of evolution. He became very much afraid: who knows, perhaps he was doing<br />
something against God. He had believed that God created the world, but the facts of nature were<br />
telling a different s<strong>to</strong>ry – everything is evolving, life is never the same again.<br />
So if anybody believes in God, he cannot believe that you are a being.<br />
Only things are created; they have a beginning and an end – beings are eternal.<br />
Because of this fact, two religions in India, Jainism and Buddhism, dropped the idea of God –<br />
because <strong>to</strong> keep that idea simply meant you were dropping<br />
the idea of being, which is far more significant. They would have liked <strong>to</strong> keep both, but it was<br />
logically impossible.<br />
Once you accept that you have been created, you accept the other part of it, that the same whimsical<br />
man, any day, can un-create you. So what meaning do you have? – just a <strong>to</strong>y in the hands of some<br />
magical old man? So whenever He wants, He plays with the <strong>to</strong>ys, and whenever He wants, He<br />
destroys them? It was really a great, courageous step on the part of Mahavira and Buddha <strong>to</strong><br />
choose being and drop the idea of God – and that <strong>to</strong>o, twenty-five centuries ago. They could simply<br />
see that you cannot manage both; they are against each other. But they were not aware of evolution;<br />
that was a later development. Now we know that creation goes against the idea of evolution <strong>to</strong>o.<br />
<strong>From</strong> <strong>Ignorance</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> 101 <strong>Osho</strong>