28.03.2013 Views

Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...

Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...

Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cynoglossum <strong>of</strong>ficinale L.<br />

Houndstongue<br />

National Status: Near Threatened County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (3 sites, 4 tetrads)<br />

Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />

Ferry Meadows Country Park (CP) TL143972 2009 (DB)<br />

Church End, Five Arches Bridge TL20358305 2011 (DB)<br />

Conington ‘Dump’ TL202832<br />

27<br />

TL201840<br />

2009 (SL)<br />

2009 (SL)<br />

Paxton Pits TL19586245 2010 (DB)<br />

This is typically a species <strong>of</strong> disturbed ground, including old quarries and gravel pits and<br />

railway embankments (Wells, 2003). It has probably suffered in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong>, and<br />

elsewhere, as a result <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts to ‘tidy-up’ such habitats.<br />

Cyperus longus L.<br />

Galingale<br />

National Status: Nationally Scarce, Near<br />

Threatened<br />

County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (3 sites, 3 tetrads)<br />

Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />

Huntingdon bypass, near TL2471 1995 (TB)<br />

St Ives, ditch on NE side Marley Road TL314734 2005 (NM)<br />

Somersham, The Lake TL366781 (centroid) 1996 (TB)<br />

This species is not native in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong> and <strong>the</strong> above populations are most likely<br />

derived from a garden throw-out.<br />

Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link ssp. scoparius<br />

Broom<br />

National Status: Not scarce, not threatened County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (1 site, 1 tetrad)<br />

Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />

Orton Pits SSSI TL162940 2009 (NC)<br />

Wells (2003) did not consider this species native in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong> despite records going<br />

back to 1846. While it is undoubtedly associated with anthropogenic habitats this is not in<br />

itself sufficient to reach such a conclusion and I am aware <strong>of</strong> no evidence to demonstrate that<br />

it did not colonise <strong>the</strong> County under its own steam. On this basis, <strong>the</strong>re is currently no<br />

evidence to indicate that it is no less worthy <strong>of</strong> conservation than any <strong>of</strong> our o<strong>the</strong>r native plant<br />

species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!