Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...
Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...
Rare Plant Register for Huntingdonshire - Botanical Society of the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cynoglossum <strong>of</strong>ficinale L.<br />
Houndstongue<br />
National Status: Near Threatened County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (3 sites, 4 tetrads)<br />
Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />
Ferry Meadows Country Park (CP) TL143972 2009 (DB)<br />
Church End, Five Arches Bridge TL20358305 2011 (DB)<br />
Conington ‘Dump’ TL202832<br />
27<br />
TL201840<br />
2009 (SL)<br />
2009 (SL)<br />
Paxton Pits TL19586245 2010 (DB)<br />
This is typically a species <strong>of</strong> disturbed ground, including old quarries and gravel pits and<br />
railway embankments (Wells, 2003). It has probably suffered in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong>, and<br />
elsewhere, as a result <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts to ‘tidy-up’ such habitats.<br />
Cyperus longus L.<br />
Galingale<br />
National Status: Nationally Scarce, Near<br />
Threatened<br />
County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (3 sites, 3 tetrads)<br />
Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />
Huntingdon bypass, near TL2471 1995 (TB)<br />
St Ives, ditch on NE side Marley Road TL314734 2005 (NM)<br />
Somersham, The Lake TL366781 (centroid) 1996 (TB)<br />
This species is not native in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong> and <strong>the</strong> above populations are most likely<br />
derived from a garden throw-out.<br />
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link ssp. scoparius<br />
Broom<br />
National Status: Not scarce, not threatened County Status: <strong>Rare</strong> (1 site, 1 tetrad)<br />
Site Grid Reference Last Record<br />
Orton Pits SSSI TL162940 2009 (NC)<br />
Wells (2003) did not consider this species native in <strong>Huntingdonshire</strong> despite records going<br />
back to 1846. While it is undoubtedly associated with anthropogenic habitats this is not in<br />
itself sufficient to reach such a conclusion and I am aware <strong>of</strong> no evidence to demonstrate that<br />
it did not colonise <strong>the</strong> County under its own steam. On this basis, <strong>the</strong>re is currently no<br />
evidence to indicate that it is no less worthy <strong>of</strong> conservation than any <strong>of</strong> our o<strong>the</strong>r native plant<br />
species.