27.03.2013 Views

Review of Cabling Techniques and Environmental Effects Applicable

Review of Cabling Techniques and Environmental Effects Applicable

Review of Cabling Techniques and Environmental Effects Applicable

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cabling</strong> <strong>Techniques</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>Applicable</strong> to the Offshore Wind<br />

Farm Industry – Technical Report<br />

3.7.2 HISTORY<br />

The history <strong>of</strong> safe installation <strong>and</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> subsea cables dates back to<br />

the 19th Century when early telegraph cables across both the North Sea <strong>and</strong><br />

the Atlantic were subject to frequent damage from the local fishing activity <strong>and</strong><br />

other vessels dragging their anchors across the seabed. In this respect, little has<br />

changed in over 250 years <strong>and</strong> all seabed cables <strong>and</strong> pipelines must be assessed<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the risks <strong>of</strong> potential damage.<br />

It was only in the early 1980s that effective cable burial became a primary<br />

method for protecting subsea cables. The pioneers in this field were the owners<br />

<strong>of</strong> the various <strong>of</strong>fshore submarine telecommunication networks who realised<br />

that the new fibre optic systems would require a robust protection system to<br />

prevent costly interruptions to service. The new cables were being designed<br />

to carry many thous<strong>and</strong> more circuits than their old analogue predecessors.<br />

British Telecom conducted extensive research programmes through their<br />

Martlesham Research Facility, where a number <strong>of</strong> onshore <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore trials<br />

were undertaken to establish the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> cable burial with varying<br />

depths <strong>of</strong> burial <strong>and</strong> cover. The tests involved the use <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> fishing<br />

gear, commonly used both in shallow <strong>and</strong> deep water applications, to simulate<br />

the real conditions <strong>of</strong> fishing gear passing over cables from different angles <strong>of</strong><br />

approach. At the same time, Shell UK Exploration <strong>and</strong> Production (Shell) were<br />

conducting parallel tests to establish the potential effects <strong>of</strong> bottom trawl gear<br />

on medium to small diameter pipelines in the northern North Sea. The Shell<br />

study programme was subsequently supported by seven other North Sea oil <strong>and</strong><br />

gas operators as a joint venture.<br />

3.7.3 SHELL STUDY PROGRAMME ON PIPELINES<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the pipeline research showed that the concrete coated pipelines<br />

with diameters <strong>of</strong> 16 inches <strong>and</strong> above could be designed to tolerate trawl gear<br />

loads without the need to lower or cover the pipelines. However for smaller<br />

pipelines, or in the case where there was pipeline spanning, it was recognised<br />

that pipeline protection requirements for individual pipelines needed to be<br />

determined on a case by case basis. Subsequent to this research, a number <strong>of</strong><br />

specialist pipeline ploughs <strong>and</strong> large track burial vehicles were developed, built<br />

<strong>and</strong> commissioned <strong>and</strong> put to effective use in the North Sea burying pipelines<br />

<strong>and</strong> flowlines for the <strong>of</strong>fshore oil <strong>and</strong> gas industry.<br />

3.7.4 BRITISH TELECOM RESEARCH<br />

The British Telecom research, having focused on the much smaller targets <strong>of</strong><br />

subsea cables, came to very positive conclusions that cables lowered into open<br />

trenches stood a much improved likelihood <strong>of</strong> being protected from seabed<br />

trawler gear. However, the best form <strong>of</strong> protection was afforded when a degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> cover was placed back over the trenched cable. In this latter condition the otter<br />

boards <strong>and</strong> trawl gear can easily pass over the cable without running the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!