A JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC WRITING VOLUME 8

A JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC WRITING VOLUME 8 A JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC WRITING VOLUME 8

hilo.hawaii.edu
from hilo.hawaii.edu More from this publisher
27.03.2013 Views

d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d The Curious Case of Humour and Whoredom: The Concept of ‘Necessary’ Prostitution as it Pertains to the Social, Religious, and Sexual Lives of ‘Common Women’ in Medieval England La‘akea Yoshida History 356 Chivalry, courtly love, and knights in shining armor are products of the medieval imagination; Arthurian tales of love, and quests to attain that love, are strange shifts in the social norm compared to the true nature of medieval society. The lives of medieval women were difficult and demanding. They were servants, mothers, cooks, and responsible for the care of the home, nothing like their courtly counterparts who graced the pages of medieval scribes. Nonetheless, there was a group of women who did live in a world apart, a world separate from the social expectations of their society: the prostitutes. While “common women” in medieval England lived as outcasts of the Western Church and were viewed as problems in their civic societies, remarkably, they were able to move openly in traditional male spaces as essential members of both communities. Their status as sinful, but essential members of medieval English society was due largely in part to acceptance of the humours, theories that stated that the body was kept in balance by bodily substances and their release. The Church acknowledged the need for sexual release even though many people did not have any “moral” means of sexual expression. Therefore, prostitution existed as a service to the curious contradiction of the humours. Common women were religiously condemned and socially shunned for sexual deviancy, but public acceptance of the humours enabled prostitutes to exist within male dominated spaces in medieval English towns as an ironic necessity, as the challengers of virginity and the unlikely protectors of female chastity. In tales of courtly love, according to Dr. Derek Brewer, women are “regarded as dominant, in contrast to women’s normally inferior social position, the aspiring lover her servant.” 1 Indeed, women were subservient members of society and the most sexually oppressed, but not every woman conformed to the model set by the Church and courtly myth. The whore existed as a member of medieval English society, yet, as a member slightly separated from it. Their disconnection from the expectations of the western Church challenged accepted ideas of morality in a Europe where the Church served as the beacon of moral stability for most people. Nevertheless, the Church could not control widespread beliefs that sexuality was acceptable as part of the natural order. Thanks to the acceptance of ancient medical theories, sexuality was condemned but viewed as necessary. In turn, whores were condemned and considered necessary as well. Medieval sexuality was, by our modern world-view, unique because ideas and opinions relating to sexuality were both medically and religiously influenced. Practitioners of medieval medicine reasoned that substances called humours governed the body, and were responsible for maintaining balance. Because the body could not be studied by autopsy (which was illegal, except in very rare occasions), the Greek theory of humours offered an explanation of how the body functioned. 2 Since these substances were considered to be controlling forces behind the human body, physicians believed sex was vitally important to releasing a “dangerous buildup of the ‘seminal humour’ in men.” 3 Church authorities reluctantly agreed that sexual desire was part of natural law and although these laws were “universally shared,” Church officials condemned sexuality because “sexual desire could lead to sin—and usually did.” 4 Although church officials differed in their acceptance of sex as either good, or evil, there was a distinctly common opinion of women’s sexuality: women were considered sexually ravenous creatures and were held to higher standards of sexual morality because they were “so susceptible to sexual temptations, great care had to be taken to confine their sexual activities within a properly structured marriage relationship.” 5 The humours 1 Derek Brewer, “Chivalry,” in A Companion to Chaucer, ed. Peter Brown (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2000), 61. 2 The theory of the humours was developed because of stringent laws pertaining working with the human body. “In predominantly Christian Europe, the body was seen as sacred in many ways, and to mutilate a human body through dissection was not only disrespectful, but also sacrilegious. Therefore, dissections were only rarely performed—perhaps once or twice a year at the larger medical academies—and physicians’ knowledge of the human body was limited to gross anatomy. This is where natural philosophy came in; what physicians could not observe, they had to infer.” N.M. Heckle, “Sex, Society, and Medieval Women.” http:// www.library.rochester.edu/camelot/medsex/text.htm. 3 Heckle, “Sex, Society, and Medieval Women.” 4 James A. Brundage. “Prostitution in the Medieval Canon Law.” Signs, Vol. 1, no. 4 (Summer, 1976): 831. 5 Brundage, “Prostitution in the Medieval Canon Law,” 832. HOHONU Volume 8 2010 - 43

justified prostitution, which the Church vehemently disagreed with but ultimately adapted to it because of public belief in the theory. The general attitude of the early church towards sex was mixed. Almost every member, if not all of the early church believed that prostitution was a sin and an abomination in the eyes of God. Christian leaders like Augustine of Hippo and Saint Jerome promoted the opinion that sexual intercourse should be between couples united in marriage only. Augustine condemned prostitution and considered the creation of offspring to be “the only good excuse for such intercourse.” 6 Saint Jerome supported marriage and sexual intercourse between partners for pleasure. He worried, however, about the plight of fragile widows who might turn to prostitution for money after their husbands died. He reasoned that it was more “tolerable that a woman should marry again than that she should be a prostitute, and better that she should have a second husband than several paramours. The first alternative brings relief in a miserable plight, but the second involves a sin and its punishment.” 7 Given that the opinions of the early medieval Christian fathers became the backbone of later medieval thought, a great contradiction began to form, one where marriage was necessary for intercourse to occur at all. And because of this, a natural conflict was born from the progressive assimilation of humour theory among common towns people, many of whom did not have wives or husbands to satisfy sexual desires. Medieval canonists who were challenged by conflicts of morality accepted prostitution as a necessary evil in maintaining social order in growing urban centers. Common everyday people of a medieval English town did not share the same affixation to the rules of moral order laid out by the Church because “the laity did not always agree with the church’s definition of sexual morality.” 8 Due to thriving economic opportunity in English towns, migrants flooded into population centers, creating a necessity for whores to fulfill the needs of those people unfortunate enough to remain spouseless. Furthermore, rising male populations, and the fear that those men were seeking to rid themselves of their growing seminal humour, would have caused most growing towns to accept the incursion of prostitution. 9 Dr. Ruth Karras and Dr. 6 Philip Schaff, Saint Augustine: The Writings Against the Manichaeans and Against the Donatists, 18.65, “A Select Library of the Nicene and Post- Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church,” Internet on-line, available from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.i.html [25 September 2009] 7 Philip Schaff, Saint Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome, Letter CXXIII, To Ageruchia, 231.4, “A Select Library of the Nicene and Post- Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church,” Internet on-line, available from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.i.html [25 September 2009] 8 Norman Tanner, Sethina Watson. “Least of the Laity: The Minimum Requirements of a Medieval Christian.” Journal of Medieval History, 32 (2006): 412. 9 Population numbers fluctuated because of famine and the plague. Using London as an indicator of population figures in English urban centers, the Museum of London states, “in 1066 London’s population was about 44 - HOHONU Volume 8 2010 James Brundage agree that both Church authorities and civic officials understood the contradictory need for prostitutes in maintaining a good and chaste society. According to Brundage: Medieval society recognized prostitution as a necessary evil. Sinful men, theologians held would corrupt respectable women—even their own wives—or turn to sodomy if they did not have the prostitute as a sexual outlet: ‘remove the prostitute and you will destroy everything with lust’…Prostitution may be treated as a moral category…Or prostitution may be treated primarily as a legal category, a type of trade which has implications for public order and policy. 10 Thus, it is a paradox that the medieval whore was not only part of maintaining social control in English urban centers, but that they were absolutely necessary in doing so. English streets crowded by wandering males with a belly of ale, and a mind full of lust, was not an alternative that most towns were willing to accept—no matter what the church decreed that towns should do, prostitutes were need to satisfy this segment of the population. Public acceptance of the humours created a dilemma for church authorities because prostitution fell under civic authority. The church essentially had to contend with civic authorities in various towns and decide whether they would conform to religious standards of prosecution or not. 11 Even if it was the expectation that every man and woman understand the religiously moral teachings of the church, Dr. Norman Tanner and Dr. Sethina Wilson argue: The distinction between explicit and implicit knowledge could mean that Christians were bound to a surprisingly minimal understanding of their religion. Innocent IV argued that intelligent laypeople might seek to learn more, but there was no sin if they did not since it was sufficient for them to devote themselves to good works. 12 Often villages and towns only fined whores for practicing their trade in town boundaries because to remove prostitution completely might be disastrous. The brothel was the “societal safety valve” 13 in many English towns, serving a wide variety of clientele: peasants, aristocrats, and religious leaders—although 10,000. By 1300 it expanded to over 80,000, but after famines and the Black Death it fell again to about 40,000. People moved to London from all over England to find work and better lives for their families. The wealthiest people lived in mansions, usually along the Strand close to Westminster.” Museum of London. “What was life like in medieval London?” [Who lived there?]. http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/ English/Learning/Learningonline/features/viking/viking_4.htm [24 October 2009]. 10 Brundage, “Prostitution in the Medieval Cannon Law,” 826. 11 Ruth M. Karras, “The Regulation of Brothels in Later Medieval England,” Signs, Vol. 14, no. 2 (Winter 1989): 404. 12 Norman Tanner, Sethina Watson, “Least of the Laity: The Minimum Requirements of a Medieval Christian,” 400. 13 “Despite their recognition that prostitution was a necessary feature of society, the municipalities of continental Europe still paid lip service to the Church’s ideals of sexual purity.” Karras, “The Regulation of Brothels in Later Medieval England,” 401.

justified prostitution, which the Church vehemently disagreed<br />

with but ultimately adapted to it because of public belief in the<br />

theory.<br />

The general attitude of the early church towards sex was<br />

mixed. Almost every member, if not all of the early church<br />

believed that prostitution was a sin and an abomination in the<br />

eyes of God. Christian leaders like Augustine of Hippo and<br />

Saint Jerome promoted the opinion that sexual intercourse<br />

should be between couples united in marriage only. Augustine<br />

condemned prostitution and considered the creation of<br />

offspring to be “the only good excuse for such intercourse.” 6<br />

Saint Jerome supported marriage and sexual intercourse<br />

between partners for pleasure. He worried, however, about<br />

the plight of fragile widows who might turn to prostitution<br />

for money after their husbands died. He reasoned that it was<br />

more “tolerable that a woman should marry again than that she<br />

should be a prostitute, and better that she should have a second<br />

husband than several paramours. The first alternative brings<br />

relief in a miserable plight, but the second involves a sin and its<br />

punishment.” 7 Given that the opinions of the early medieval<br />

Christian fathers became the backbone of later medieval<br />

thought, a great contradiction began to form, one where<br />

marriage was necessary for intercourse to occur at all. And<br />

because of this, a natural conflict was born from the progressive<br />

assimilation of humour theory among common towns people,<br />

many of whom did not have wives or husbands to satisfy sexual<br />

desires.<br />

Medieval canonists who were challenged by conflicts of<br />

morality accepted prostitution as a necessary evil in maintaining<br />

social order in growing urban centers. Common everyday<br />

people of a medieval English town did not share the same<br />

affixation to the rules of moral order laid out by the Church<br />

because “the laity did not always agree with the church’s<br />

definition of sexual morality.” 8 Due to thriving economic<br />

opportunity in English towns, migrants flooded into population<br />

centers, creating a necessity for whores to fulfill the needs<br />

of those people unfortunate enough to remain spouseless.<br />

Furthermore, rising male populations, and the fear that those<br />

men were seeking to rid themselves of their growing seminal<br />

humour, would have caused most growing towns to accept<br />

the incursion of prostitution. 9 Dr. Ruth Karras and Dr.<br />

6 Philip Schaff, Saint Augustine: The Writings Against the Manichaeans and<br />

Against the Donatists, 18.65, “A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-<br />

Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church,” Internet on-line, available from<br />

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.i.html [25 September 2009]<br />

7 Philip Schaff, Saint Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome, Letter<br />

CXXIII, To Ageruchia, 231.4, “A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-<br />

Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church,” Internet on-line, available from<br />

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.i.html [25 September 2009]<br />

8 Norman Tanner, Sethina Watson. “Least of the Laity: The Minimum<br />

Requirements of a Medieval Christian.” Journal of Medieval History, 32<br />

(2006): 412.<br />

9 Population numbers fluctuated because of famine and the plague. Using<br />

London as an indicator of population figures in English urban centers,<br />

the Museum of London states, “in 1066 London’s population was about<br />

44 - HOHONU Volume 8 2010<br />

James Brundage agree that both Church authorities and civic<br />

officials understood the contradictory need for prostitutes in<br />

maintaining a good and chaste society. According to Brundage:<br />

Medieval society recognized prostitution as a necessary<br />

evil. Sinful men, theologians held would corrupt respectable<br />

women—even their own wives—or turn to sodomy if they did<br />

not have the prostitute as a sexual outlet: ‘remove the prostitute<br />

and you will destroy everything with lust’…Prostitution<br />

may be treated as a moral category…Or prostitution may be<br />

treated primarily as a legal category, a type of trade which has<br />

implications for public order and policy. 10<br />

Thus, it is a paradox that the medieval whore was not only<br />

part of maintaining social control in English urban centers, but<br />

that they were absolutely necessary in doing so. English streets<br />

crowded by wandering males with a belly of ale, and a mind<br />

full of lust, was not an alternative that most towns were willing<br />

to accept—no matter what the church decreed that towns<br />

should do, prostitutes were need to satisfy this segment of the<br />

population.<br />

Public acceptance of the humours created a dilemma<br />

for church authorities because prostitution fell under civic<br />

authority. The church essentially had to contend with civic<br />

authorities in various towns and decide whether they would<br />

conform to religious standards of prosecution or not. 11 Even if<br />

it was the expectation that every man and woman understand<br />

the religiously moral teachings of the church, Dr. Norman<br />

Tanner and Dr. Sethina Wilson argue:<br />

The distinction between explicit and implicit knowledge<br />

could mean that Christians were bound to a surprisingly<br />

minimal understanding of their religion. Innocent IV argued<br />

that intelligent laypeople might seek to learn more, but there<br />

was no sin if they did not since it was sufficient for them to<br />

devote themselves to good works. 12<br />

Often villages and towns only fined whores for practicing<br />

their trade in town boundaries because to remove prostitution<br />

completely might be disastrous. The brothel was the “societal<br />

safety valve” 13 in many English towns, serving a wide variety of<br />

clientele: peasants, aristocrats, and religious leaders—although<br />

10,000. By 1300 it expanded to over 80,000, but after famines and the<br />

Black Death it fell again to about 40,000. People moved to London<br />

from all over England to find work and better lives for their families.<br />

The wealthiest people lived in mansions, usually along the Strand close<br />

to Westminster.” Museum of London. “What was life like in medieval<br />

London?” [Who lived there?]. http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/<br />

English/Learning/Learningonline/features/viking/viking_4.htm [24<br />

October 2009].<br />

10 Brundage, “Prostitution in the Medieval Cannon Law,” 826.<br />

11 Ruth M. Karras, “The Regulation of Brothels in Later Medieval<br />

England,” Signs, Vol. 14, no. 2 (Winter 1989): 404.<br />

12 Norman Tanner, Sethina Watson, “Least of the Laity: The Minimum<br />

Requirements of a Medieval Christian,” 400.<br />

13 “Despite their recognition that prostitution was a necessary feature of<br />

society, the municipalities of continental Europe still paid lip service to<br />

the Church’s ideals of sexual purity.” Karras, “The Regulation of Brothels<br />

in Later Medieval England,” 401.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!