27.03.2013 Views

Messinian forced regressions in the Adana Basin: a near ... - Tübitak

Messinian forced regressions in the Adana Basin: a near ... - Tübitak

Messinian forced regressions in the Adana Basin: a near ... - Tübitak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1.3. Bottomset facies<br />

The basal deltaic facies are only locally exposed, but are<br />

generally similar. The gently <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed delta-toe deposits<br />

(Figures 4a and 6) are th<strong>in</strong>ly bedded, f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

sandstones and siltstones with plane-parallel stratification<br />

and m<strong>in</strong>or ripple cross-lam<strong>in</strong>ation. Delta bottomset<br />

consists of th<strong>in</strong> siltstone and sandstone beds <strong>in</strong>tercalated<br />

with mudstones (Figure 6). The microfauna content of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se deposits is described <strong>in</strong> a subsequent section.<br />

5.2. Incised valley-fill deposits<br />

This facies assemblage is exposed <strong>in</strong> a chance crosscut<br />

section <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proximal part of <strong>the</strong> Muratlı Member<br />

(Figures 1c and 5), but similar unexposed deposits<br />

presumably also occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2 o<strong>the</strong>r coeval deltaic members<br />

8<br />

ILGAR et al. / Turkish J Earth Sci<br />

A B<br />

C<br />

1 m<br />

E F<br />

Figure 3. <strong>Mess<strong>in</strong>ian</strong> evaporites <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Adana</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong>. (a) An example outcrop of <strong>the</strong> evaporites at<br />

<strong>the</strong> top of Handere Formation. (b) Enterolithic gypsum. (c) Crystall<strong>in</strong>e gypsum with a chevron<br />

growth structure. (d) Crystall<strong>in</strong>e gypsum with a grassy growth structure. (e) Nodular gypsum.<br />

(f) Gypsarenite with wave-ripple cross-lam<strong>in</strong>ation. The co<strong>in</strong> (scale) is 2 cm.<br />

D<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Handere Formation, where no similar transverse<br />

sections are available. These deposits are recognisably<br />

coarser-gra<strong>in</strong>ed, compris<strong>in</strong>g pebble conglomerates and<br />

subord<strong>in</strong>ate coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed sandstones with scattered<br />

cobbles and boulders (Figure 5). Conglomerates are clastsupported,<br />

with a matrix of medium to coarse sand and<br />

granules. Gravel clasts are moderately sorted, ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

subangular to subrounded, and of <strong>the</strong> same provenance<br />

as <strong>the</strong> delta gravel. Scattered boulders are derived from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong>-marg<strong>in</strong> Miocene reefal limestones. The deposits<br />

form erosionally based, vertically stacked f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g-upwards<br />

bedsets (Figure 5) <strong>in</strong>terpreted to be multistorey braidedstream<br />

palaeochannels (Coll<strong>in</strong>son 1996; Miall 1996),<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly 0.8–1.6 m thick and 10–25 m wide. Coarse gravelly<br />

channel-floor lags are poorly developed, but solitary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!