APPENDIX C΄ ON DEPILATION: BODY COSMETICS IN CLASSICAL ...

APPENDIX C΄ ON DEPILATION: BODY COSMETICS IN CLASSICAL ... APPENDIX C΄ ON DEPILATION: BODY COSMETICS IN CLASSICAL ...

philosophical.research.org
from philosophical.research.org More from this publisher
27.03.2013 Views

592 APPENDIX Fr. 473 Radt). The sense would present exactly the same kind of difficulty as the present one, but for Hesychius’ gloss on ΢ıÈÛÙd ¯ÂÈ- ÚfiÌ·ÎÙÚÔÓ: Ôî ·ı·È ÙáÓ Ï·Ì‚·ÓÔÌ¤ÓˆÓ âÓ appleÔϤÌÔȘ àÓıÚÒappleˆÓ (Lennep for the ms. Ï·Ì‚. appleÔÏÏÔÖ˜ zÓ; I would omit àÓıÚÒappleˆÓ altogether) Ùa˜ ÎÂÊ·Ïa˜ âΉ¤ÚÔÓÙ˜ +qÛ·Ó+ (something is missing here) àÓÙd ¯ÂÈÚÔÌ¿ÎÙÚˆÓ â¯ÚáÓÙÔ. For details, see Herodotus IV, 64. In other cases the play is more obvious. Thus in Pollux, IX, 71, we have a Hermippian fragment from ¢ËÌfiÙ·È (Fr. I Meineke, vol. II p. 385 = Fr. 13 PCGr. vol. V p. 568): OúÌÔÈ, Ù› ‰Ú¿Ûˆ ۇ̂ÔÏÔÓ ÎÂηÚ- ̤ÓÔ˜; which is explained by Pollux as follows: ÂúË ‰’ iÓ Î·d ۇ̂ÔÏÔÓ ‚Ú·¯f ÓÔÌÈÛÌ¿ÙÈÔÓ, ìÌ›ÙÔÌfiÓ ÙÈ ÓÔÌ›ÛÌ·ÙÔ˜; thus the speaker in the fragment must have been tonsured on half of his head only, for some reason: ÎÂοÚı·È öÔÈΠÙe ≥ÌÈÛ˘. (Pollux then goes on to explain how the ۇ̂ÔÏÔÓ can be half a coin in an appropriate sense. Other things, like knucklebones, could be used for ۇ̂ÔÏ· - Û‡Ì+‚¿Ïψ - for purposes of indisputable identification and recognition: v. Scholia to Euripides Medea, 610). The same expression could be used in describing a half-shaven face. This is what happens to Mnesilochus when he tries to escape in the midst of his sufferings at Euripides’ hands; Thesmoph. 226-7: ÔûÎÔ˘Ó Î·Ù·Á¤Ï·ÛÙÔ˜ ‰ÉÙ’ öÛÂÈ / ÙcÓ ìÌ›ÎÚ·ÈÚ·Ó ÙcÓ ëÙ¤Ú·Ó „ÈÏcÓ ö¯ˆÓ. Such a case of literally incongruous combination of elements is, I think, presented by our present passage; Ecclesiaz., 719 sqq. An antithesis to the Ôé¯d ‰ÂÖ ÎÔÛÌÔ˘Ì¤Ó·˜ is needed; thus, after: they must sleep with slaves only, we could expect: either (1) wearing a slave-dress, or (2) having hair dresses appropriate to slaves. Additionally some reference to their sexual condition would be more than likely. Aristophanes boldly combines all three expected elements in an utterly unexpected formation: ¯ÔÖÚÔ˜ provides the sexual reference; ηوӿÎË the dress proper to slaves; àappleÔÙÂÙÈÏ̤ӷ˜ (in place of the would-be àappleÔÎÂηÚ- ̤ӷ˜ were it about hair-dressing proper, on the head) the some characteristic hair-dressing, like the ÛοÊÈÔÓ àappleÔÎÂηṲ́ÓËÓ of Thesmoph. 838, where see the scholia. The joke is that the slave girls must not only be not allowed to beautify themselves, but even their pudendum must be depilated in a slave-fashion! An Aristophanic comic extravagance. That youths and young men had their pubic hair dressed in various ways and shapes already in archaic times is amply testified by

ON DEPILATION: BODY COSMETICS IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY 593 extant sculpture (ÎÔÜÚÔÈ). (3) Plucking off the pubic hair was also reserved as a punishment for ÌÔȯԇ˜, adulterers, but in such cases it was executed in a way ensuring a painful and torturing experience. Thus in Nubes, 1083-4, the ¢›Î·ÈÔ˜ §fiÁÔ˜ asks the òA‰ÈÎÔ˜ §fiÁÔ˜ about the likely influence of the latter’s teachings on the young man, especially as regards his easy and free intercourse with married women: Ù› ‰’ jÓ Ú·Ê·ÓȉˆıFÉ appleÈıfiÌÂÓfi˜ ÛÔÈ Ù¤ÊÚ÷· Ù ÙÈÏıFÉ; ≤ÍÂÈ ÙÈÓa ÁÓÒÌËÓ Ï¤ÁÂÈÓ Ùe Ìc ÂéÚ‡appleÚˆÎÙÔ˜ ÂrÓ·È; The scholia to this passage, and to Plutus 168, (cf. also Suda s.v. Ú·Ê·Ó›˜) explain the situation. Poor adulterers if caught, unable to pay the fine or recompense, were subjected to this inglorious treatment (‰ËÌÔÛ›÷· says the scholium ad Plutus, 168; we would scarcely believe this but for Demosthenes, p. 1367 Reiske to be quoted below) which consisted in a) Ú·Ê·Ó›‰ˆÛȘ (= thrusting of raddish up the anus), and b) removal of pubic hair with simultaneous application of hot ashes to the thereby irritated skin. (Suda s.v. Ú·Ê·Ó›˜: Ô≈Ùˆ ÁaÚ ÙÔf˜ êÏfiÓÙ·˜ ÌÔȯÔf˜ FäΛ˙ÔÓÙÔØ Ú·Ê·ÓÖ‰·˜ Ï·Ì‚¿ÓÔÓÙ˜ ηı›ÂÛ·Ó Âå˜ ÙÔf˜ appleÚˆ- ÎÙÔf˜ ÙÔ‡ÙˆÓ, ηd apple·Ú·Ù›ÏÏÔÓÙ˜ ·éÙÔf˜ ıÂÚÌcÓ Ù¤ÊÚ·Ó âapple¤apple·Ù- ÙÔÓ, ‚·Û¿ÓÔ˘˜ îηӿ˜ âÚÁ·˙fiÌÂÓÔÈ. But perhaps the ashes were utilized in the process of depilation, just as pitch (‰Úáapple·Í) was normally). See also Lucianus de Morte Peregrini 9 for appleÏËÁ¿˜ (lashes) and Ú·Ê·ÓÈÛÌÔ‡˜ as the punishment for adultery. For Ú·Ê·ÓÈÛÌfi˜ cf. Hesychius s.vv. Ú·Ê·ÓȉˆıÉÓ·È and §·ÎÈ¿‰·È; the proverbial expression oø §·ÎÈ¿‰·È in Appendix Paroemiogr. Gr. V, 43; Suda s.v. oø §·ÎÈ¿‰·È; Catullus XV, 18-19. When appropriate radishes (the Ì·ÎÚa Ú¿Ê·ÓÔ˜) were not ready to hand, the shaft of an axe or such like instrument could be employed or àÏ¿‚·ÛÙ·, globular, elongated vases without handles, v. the passages from Suda and Appendix Paroem. already mentioned (àÏ·‚¿ÛÙÔȘ is clearly the correct reading in both places, in view of Pausanias statement apud Eustathius, 1161.32: àÏ¿‚·ÛÙÔ˜Ø ˇz â¯ÚáÓÙÔ âappled ÙÈ̈ڛ÷· ÙáÓ ÌÔȯáÓ àÓÙd ÙÔÜ Ú·Ê¿ÓÔ˘). Still another substitute of Ú·Ê·Ó›˜ was the sea-mullet (v. Catullus loc.cit.; Juvenalis, X, 317) which must have resulted in an excruciating operation in view of the fish’s large head (sch. to Juvenal ad.loc.: mugilis: piscis grandis capitis, postremus exilis, qui in podicem

<strong>ON</strong> DEPILATI<strong>ON</strong>: <strong>BODY</strong> <strong>COSMETICS</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>CLASSICAL</strong> ANTIQUITY 593<br />

extant sculpture (ÎÔÜÚÔÈ).<br />

(3) Plucking off the pubic hair was also reserved as a punishment<br />

for ÌÔȯԇ˜, adulterers, but in such cases it was executed in a way<br />

ensuring a painful and torturing experience. Thus in Nubes, 1083-4,<br />

the ¢›Î·ÈÔ˜ §fiÁÔ˜ asks the òA‰ÈÎÔ˜ §fiÁÔ˜ about the likely influence<br />

of the latter’s teachings on the young man, especially as regards his easy<br />

and free intercourse with married women:<br />

Ù› ‰’ jÓ Ú·Ê·ÓȉˆıFÉ appleÈıfiÌÂÓfi˜ ÛÔÈ Ù¤ÊÚ÷· Ù ÙÈÏıFÉ;<br />

≤ÍÂÈ ÙÈÓa ÁÓÒÌËÓ Ï¤ÁÂÈÓ Ùe Ìc ÂéÚ‡appleÚˆÎÙÔ˜ ÂrÓ·È;<br />

The scholia to this passage, and to Plutus 168, (cf. also Suda s.v.<br />

Ú·Ê·Ó›˜) explain the situation. Poor adulterers if caught, unable to pay<br />

the fine or recompense, were subjected to this inglorious treatment<br />

(‰ËÌÔÛ›÷· says the scholium ad Plutus, 168; we would scarcely believe<br />

this but for Demosthenes, p. 1367 Reiske to be quoted below) which<br />

consisted in a) Ú·Ê·Ó›‰ˆÛȘ (= thrusting of raddish up the anus), and<br />

b) removal of pubic hair with simultaneous application of hot ashes to<br />

the thereby irritated skin. (Suda s.v. Ú·Ê·Ó›˜: Ô≈Ùˆ ÁaÚ ÙÔf˜ êÏfiÓÙ·˜<br />

ÌÔȯÔf˜ FäΛ˙ÔÓÙÔØ Ú·Ê·ÓÖ‰·˜ Ï·Ì‚¿ÓÔÓÙ˜ ηı›ÂÛ·Ó Âå˜ ÙÔf˜ appleÚˆ-<br />

ÎÙÔf˜ ÙÔ‡ÙˆÓ, ηd apple·Ú·Ù›ÏÏÔÓÙ˜ ·éÙÔf˜ ıÂÚÌcÓ Ù¤ÊÚ·Ó âapple¤apple·Ù-<br />

ÙÔÓ, ‚·Û¿ÓÔ˘˜ îηӿ˜ âÚÁ·˙fiÌÂÓÔÈ. But perhaps the ashes were<br />

utilized in the process of depilation, just as pitch (‰Úáapple·Í) was<br />

normally). See also Lucianus de Morte Peregrini 9 for appleÏËÁ¿˜ (lashes)<br />

and Ú·Ê·ÓÈÛÌÔ‡˜ as the punishment for adultery. For Ú·Ê·ÓÈÛÌfi˜ cf.<br />

Hesychius s.vv. Ú·Ê·ÓȉˆıÉÓ·È and §·ÎÈ¿‰·È; the proverbial<br />

expression oø §·ÎÈ¿‰·È in Appendix Paroemiogr. Gr. V, 43; Suda s.v.<br />

oø §·ÎÈ¿‰·È; Catullus XV, 18-19. When appropriate radishes (the<br />

Ì·ÎÚa Ú¿Ê·ÓÔ˜) were not ready to hand, the shaft of an axe or such<br />

like instrument could be employed or àÏ¿‚·ÛÙ·, globular, elongated<br />

vases without handles, v. the passages from Suda and Appendix<br />

Paroem. already mentioned (àÏ·‚¿ÛÙÔȘ is clearly the correct reading<br />

in both places, in view of Pausanias statement apud Eustathius,<br />

1161.32: àÏ¿‚·ÛÙÔ˜Ø ˇz â¯ÚáÓÙÔ âappled ÙÈ̈ڛ÷· ÙáÓ ÌÔȯáÓ àÓÙd ÙÔÜ<br />

Ú·Ê¿ÓÔ˘). Still another substitute of Ú·Ê·Ó›˜ was the sea-mullet (v.<br />

Catullus loc.cit.; Juvenalis, X, 317) which must have resulted in an<br />

excruciating operation in view of the fish’s large head (sch. to Juvenal<br />

ad.loc.: mugilis: piscis grandis capitis, postremus exilis, qui in podicem

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!