Bullies at the Ballot Box - Demos

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Board of Elections to Nick Surgey, August 16, 2012 at 9:05 a.m. (on file with authors). 374. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-48. 375. Project Vote, “Voter Intimidation,” http://www.projectvote.org/voterintimidation.html. 376. See Email from Don Wright, General Counsel, North Carolina State Board of Elections to Nick Surgey, August 16, 2012 at 9:05 a.m. (on file with authors). 377. Christina Bellantoni, “McCain supporters heckle early voters,” The Washington Times, Oct. 20, 2008, available at http://www. washingtontimes.com/weblogs/bellantoni/2008/Oct/20/mccainsupporters-call-early-voters-ch/. 378. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3599.01(A)(2). 379. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3599.24. 380. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3501.35. 381. Id. 382. 25 P.S. §§ 3547. 383. Id. 384. Id. 385. Id. 386. Tex. Elec. Ann. § 61.008. 387. Tex. Elec. Ann. § 61.003. 388. Tex. Elec. Ann. § 61.001. 389. Va. Code Ann. § 24.2-604(A). 390. Va. Stat. Ann. § 24.2-1005. 391. Va. Code Ann. § 24.2-604(D). 392. Ryan J. Reilly, “DOJ Probes TX Voter Intimidation Complaints During Tea Party Anti-Voter Fraud Drive,” Talking Points Memo, October 19, 2010, available at http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo. com/2010/10/the_texas_democratic_party_expanded.php. 393. See Citizens for Police Accountability Political Committee, 572 F.3d 1213, 1221 (11th Cir. 2009). 394. See Burson v. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (1992). 395. See e.g. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9—122(3). 396. See Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 715, 716 (2000). 397. See id. at 716. 398. Ohio Secretary of State, Directive 2012-30, “Pre-Election Voter Challenges,” available at http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/Upload/ elections/directives/2012/Dir2012-30.pdf. 399. H.R. 5799 (112th Cong.). 400. Id. 58 • Bullies at the Ballot Box | September 2012
September 2012 | Bullies at the Ballot Box • 59
Page 1 and 2:
Bullies at the Ballot Box Protectin
Page 3 and 4:
taBle oF Contents exeCutive summary
Page 5 and 6:
exeCutIVe Summary they say they wan
Page 7 and 8:
gloSSary Caging - the practice of c
Page 9 and 10:
ecruit poll watchers for Election D
Page 11 and 12: of email sent between RNC employees
Page 13 and 14: should guard against extensive last
Page 15 and 16: In June 2012, the Department of Jus
Page 17 and 18: proof” of qualifications to vote.
Page 19 and 20: least one additional screen from fr
Page 21 and 22: eCommendatIonS For addreSSIng CagIn
Page 23 and 24: and a media observer with valid med
Page 25 and 26: challenged, the process for determi
Page 27 and 28: place. 280 They may not impede the
Page 29 and 30: and request proof of eligibility. G
Page 31 and 32: challenges, rules governing the cha
Page 33 and 34: tampering with a voter’s ballot,
Page 35 and 36: estrict protests within a certain a
Page 37 and 38: 1. state laws governing Pre-eleCtio
Page 39 and 40: aSSeSSment: are VoterS ProteCted? h
Page 41 and 42: aSSeSSment: are VoterS ProteCted? h
Page 43 and 44: aSSeSSment: are VoterS ProteCted? P
Page 55 and 56: 4. state laws For aDDressing voter
Page 57 and 58: endnoteS 1. Brentin Mock, “How th
Page 59 and 60: 87. Marc Caputo, “Florida’s Vot
Page 61: 277. Id. 278. Id. 279. Id. 280. N.C
show all

Bullies at the Ballot Box - Demos

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?