27.03.2013 Views

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4 Options<br />

The default method used in <strong>STAR*NET</strong> to compute the actual standard error used<br />

for a distance is to add the constant and the proportional parts. This method, called<br />

the “additive” method, is preferred by most manufacturers.<br />

For a distance of 2,000 feet, a constant of 0.016 feet and a 3 ppm part:<br />

Std Error = 0.016 + (3 ppm x 2,000 feet) / 1,000,000 = 0.022 feet<br />

Another method preferred by some is called the “propagated” method in which the<br />

standard error is computed by taking the square root of the sum of the squares of the<br />

two parts. This method is available by using a special “.EDM” inline option. See the<br />

section “ Inline Options” in Chapter 5 for details on its use.<br />

Note that standard errors for distances explicitly entered on data lines are not<br />

affected by an entered ppm value. Only those distances accepting the default<br />

standard error are affected by the proportional ppm part.<br />

Elev Diff PPM – Since an elevation difference is often derived from measuring a<br />

zenith angle and slope distance, you may want to inflate its actual standard error<br />

based on how large the distance is by applying a PPM. This PPM is based on the<br />

slope distance between the instrument and target, not the elevation difference.<br />

<strong>STAR*NET</strong> calculates this slope distance using the given or computed approximate<br />

coordinates for the instrument and target stations. Entering a ppm value for elevation<br />

difference observations cause larger total standard errors (less weight) to be applied<br />

when long slope distances are involved than short.<br />

The method used to compute the actual standard error value is to add the constant<br />

and the proportional parts. For example, using a standard error of 0.05 feet and 25<br />

ppm, the total standard error for an elevation difference observation measured along<br />

a slope distance of 1,000 would be:<br />

Std Error = 0.05 + (25 ppm x 1,000 feet) / 1,000,000 = 0.0750 feet<br />

The value you actually use for “ppm” must be some value you feel comfortable with,<br />

and should be based on your experience in the field. A good value to start with might<br />

be the 25 ppm figure used in the example above. To do a rough validity check on this<br />

figure, assume a zenith angle uncertainty of plus or minus 5 seconds. Therefore, the<br />

vertical distance error calculated using a 5 second arc swing over a distance of<br />

1,000,000 feet is about 25 feet, therefore the 25 ppm. Or for example, if you feel<br />

your zenith angle uncertainty is more in the 10 second range, then you might use 50<br />

ppm for your proportional elevation difference standard error.<br />

This method of calculating the total standard error for an elevation difference is an<br />

empirical approach. An alternate but more complex method is to propagate the<br />

uncertainties of both the measured distance and zenith angle. However, based on<br />

normal survey measurements and practices, we believe this method will provide a<br />

proper yet easy to understand way of weighting these derived measurements.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!