27.03.2013 Views

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

STAR*NET V6 - Circe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C – ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION<br />

For reference, some general information and formulas used are listed here.<br />

C.1 Program Limits<br />

Limits for input data used in the program:<br />

Number of stations in a network: 10,000<br />

Length of an input data line: 500 Characters<br />

Length of station names: 15<br />

Length of station descriptors: 48<br />

Length of instrument library names: 15<br />

Limits for data in the STAR6.CUS custom grid and linear units definitions file:<br />

Length of a data line: 128 Characters<br />

Length of an ellipsoid name: 18<br />

Length of a zone name: 18<br />

Length of a linear “units” name: 8<br />

Limits for data in the STAR6.FMT format definitions file:<br />

Length of data line: 154 Characters<br />

Length of format style name: 22<br />

Length of format script definition: 128<br />

C.2 Refraction<br />

The formula used in the <strong>STAR*NET</strong> to compute the internal refraction correction to<br />

zenith angles is shown in section 3.20, page 264, “Geodesy,” by G. Bomford, Oxford<br />

University Press, 1971. This formula states that:<br />

Refraction Correction = Coefficient of Refraction * Central Angle<br />

Where: Central Angle is the angle subtended by the observation line at the earth’s center.<br />

When the program is first installed, a default coefficient value of 0.07 is initialized in the<br />

company options. This is considered an average value that can be used for most average<br />

field conditions. However, in the publication, Bomford indicates in Table 1.1 on page 59<br />

that coefficients may vary in extreme cases from “0.81” (about 10 meters above bare<br />

plains, night, still and clear) to “-0.10” (about 10 meters above bare plains, midday, still<br />

and clear, probably with some heat mirage). In the latter case, with a negative coefficient<br />

of refraction, the refraction path would bend toward the ground rather than upward.<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!