Expertise in nursing practice : caring, clinical judgment - Springer ...

Expertise in nursing practice : caring, clinical judgment - Springer ... Expertise in nursing practice : caring, clinical judgment - Springer ...

springerpub.com
from springerpub.com More from this publisher
27.03.2013 Views

Chapter 1 The Relationship of Theory and Practice in the Acquisition of Skill 19 To see why, we must first distinguish illness from disease.According to Benner and Wrubel (1989) disease is an organic dysfunction,ofwhich modern medicine has a theory, whereas illness is the experience of the breakdown of one’s body and thus of one’s everyday world. As theynote: As long as one has no symptoms or other disruption of usual functioning, there is noexperience of illness,eventhough disease may be present and the body may be suffering damage at the cellular, tissue or organ level. Nurses are in the unique position of being able to understand both the disease experience and the meanings that the patient brings to that experience. As a result, nurses can help shape the illness experience for the patient by guiding, interpreting, and coaching. (pp. 8–9) Nursing, because it treats both disease and illness, is at the same time a paradigm caseofappliedtheory and an outstanding exampleofa practice that is in principle beyond the reach of theory and analytical reason. Disease is a dysfunction of the body, a physical object governed by physical laws, so it should come as no surprise that Hippocrates’ vision of the physician as scientist is finally being achieved. Yet, it would be a mistakecharacteristicofour rationalisticculture to think that the success of medicine in any way suggests that there can be atheory of nursing as a caring practice. Caring in the context of nursing consists in keeping open the possibilities that can be saved inthe world of the sick person while aiding the person inletting go ofpossibilities that are no longer realistic. If man were simply a rational animal, as the Greeks thought, then there might be atheory of having a world and how to keep it. But aschool of philosophy, developed inthe beginning of this century and based on theexistential thought of Soren Kierkegaard, denies that man can be understoodassomecombination of body and mind. Martin Heidegger (1926/1962), the most famous philosopher in this school, stated that human beings are defined bythe stand they take upon themselves, which in turn sets up the rangeofpossibilities opento them. In this view, human being is a unique way of being in that everything human beings do follows fromtheir individual self-interpretation. The meaning of awhole life is basic and determines what possibilitiesshow up and howthey make sense to aperson. Moreover, we are not objective, theoretical spectators of our lives and of the world but are involved participants. Things show up as mattering to us. Heidegger sums this up by saying that the human being does not have fixed properties like an object or animal, but that man’s basic way of being is care. It is this way of being that must be

Chapter 1 The Relationship of Theory and Practice <strong>in</strong> the Acquisition of Skill 19<br />

To see why, we must first dist<strong>in</strong>guish illness from disease.Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Benner and Wrubel (1989) disease is an organic dysfunction,ofwhich<br />

modern medic<strong>in</strong>e has a theory, whereas illness is the experience of the<br />

breakdown of one’s body and thus of one’s everyday world. As theynote:<br />

As long as one has no symptoms or other disruption of usual function<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

there is noexperience of illness,eventhough disease may be present and the<br />

body may be suffer<strong>in</strong>g damage at the cellular, tissue or organ level. Nurses<br />

are <strong>in</strong> the unique position of be<strong>in</strong>g able to understand both the disease<br />

experience and the mean<strong>in</strong>gs that the patient br<strong>in</strong>gs to that experience.<br />

As a result, nurses can help shape the illness experience for the patient by<br />

guid<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g, and coach<strong>in</strong>g. (pp. 8–9)<br />

Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, because it treats both disease and illness, is at the same time a<br />

paradigm caseofappliedtheory and an outstand<strong>in</strong>g exampleofa <strong>practice</strong><br />

that is <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple beyond the reach of theory and analytical reason.<br />

Disease is a dysfunction of the body, a physical object governed by<br />

physical laws, so it should come as no surprise that Hippocrates’ vision<br />

of the physician as scientist is f<strong>in</strong>ally be<strong>in</strong>g achieved. Yet, it would be a<br />

mistakecharacteristicofour rationalisticculture to th<strong>in</strong>k that the success<br />

of medic<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> any way suggests that there can be atheory of nurs<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as a car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>practice</strong>. Car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the context of nurs<strong>in</strong>g consists <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

open the possibilities that can be saved <strong>in</strong>the world of the sick person<br />

while aid<strong>in</strong>g the person <strong>in</strong>lett<strong>in</strong>g go ofpossibilities that are no longer<br />

realistic. If man were simply a rational animal, as the Greeks thought,<br />

then there might be atheory of hav<strong>in</strong>g a world and how to keep it. But<br />

aschool of philosophy, developed <strong>in</strong>the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of this century and<br />

based on theexistential thought of Soren Kierkegaard, denies that man<br />

can be understoodassomecomb<strong>in</strong>ation of body and m<strong>in</strong>d. Mart<strong>in</strong> Heidegger<br />

(1926/1962), the most famous philosopher <strong>in</strong> this school, stated<br />

that human be<strong>in</strong>gs are def<strong>in</strong>ed bythe stand they take upon themselves,<br />

which <strong>in</strong> turn sets up the rangeofpossibilities opento them. In this view,<br />

human be<strong>in</strong>g is a unique way of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> that everyth<strong>in</strong>g human be<strong>in</strong>gs do<br />

follows fromtheir <strong>in</strong>dividual self-<strong>in</strong>terpretation. The mean<strong>in</strong>g of awhole<br />

life is basic and determ<strong>in</strong>es what possibilitiesshow up and howthey make<br />

sense to aperson. Moreover, we are not objective, theoretical spectators<br />

of our lives and of the world but are <strong>in</strong>volved participants. Th<strong>in</strong>gs show<br />

up as matter<strong>in</strong>g to us. Heidegger sums this up by say<strong>in</strong>g that the human<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g does not have fixed properties like an object or animal, but that<br />

man’s basic way of be<strong>in</strong>g is care. It is this way of be<strong>in</strong>g that must be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!