Transformations on image schemas and cross-linguistic polysemy

Lakoff, George, 1987: Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories
reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago
Press.
Langacker, Ronald W., 1987: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1.
Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W., 1991: Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis
of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Luraghi, Silvia, 2001: The Ancient Greek Preposition ‘metá’: A Cognitive
Account. Abstract for the 7 th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference,
July 22–27 2001, University of Santa Barbara.
Onions, C. T. (ed.), 1966: The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford:
Claredon Press.
Oxford Latin Dictionary, 1982, 2000. Ed. by P. G. W. Glau. Oxford at the
Clarendon Press.
Pokorny, Julius, 1959: Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vol. I.
Bern: Francke Verlag.
Sandra, Dominiek, 1998: What linguists can and can’t tell you about the human
mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics 9–4, 361–378.
Timmer, Esther H., 1967: A semantic comparison of the third form in Arabic
with the prepositional form in Swahili and the applied form in Kanuri.
Unpublished M, A. thesis, Stanford University.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1985: Confrontation and association. Papers from the
6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Jacek Fisiak.
John Benjamins. 515–526.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1986: On the Origins of “and” and “but” Connectives
in English. Studies in Language10–1, 137–150.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1989: On the rise of epistemic meanings in English:
An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65:1, 31–55.
Tuggy, David, 1993: Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive
Linguistics 4–3, 273–290.
Walde, A., 1965: Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl
Winter Universitetsverlag.
46