27.03.2013 Views

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which museums, a phenomenon set<br />

in a specifi c time, are only one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

possible manifestations. “<strong>Museology</strong><br />

is a self-differentiating, independent<br />

scientifi c discipline the subject <strong>of</strong><br />

which is a specifi c attitude <strong>of</strong> man<br />

to reality expressed objectively in<br />

various museum forms throughout<br />

history, an expression <strong>of</strong> and a<br />

proportionate part <strong>of</strong> memory systems.<br />

<strong>Museology</strong>, by nature a social<br />

science, pertains to the sphere <strong>of</strong><br />

mnemonic and documentary scientifi<br />

c disciplines, and contributes to<br />

the understanding <strong>of</strong> Man within<br />

society” (Stránský, 1980). This particular<br />

approach, freely criticised (the<br />

determination to impose museology<br />

as a science and to cover the whole<br />

fi eld <strong>of</strong> heritage seemed pretentious<br />

to more than one), but it is nonetheless<br />

fertile with regard to its implications.<br />

Thus the object <strong>of</strong> museology<br />

is not the museum, since this is a<br />

creation that is relatively recent in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> humanity.<br />

Taking this statement as a starting<br />

point, the concept <strong>of</strong> a “specifi c relation<br />

<strong>of</strong> man to reality”, sometimes<br />

referred to as museality (Waidacher,<br />

1996), was gradually defi ned. Thus<br />

following in the wake <strong>of</strong> the Brno<br />

school which prevailed at the time<br />

one could defi ne museology as “A<br />

science studying the specifi c relation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Man to reality, consisting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purposeful and systematic collecting<br />

and conservation <strong>of</strong> selected inanimate,<br />

material, mobile, and mainly<br />

three-dimensional objects documenting<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> nature and<br />

society” (Gregorová, 1980). How-<br />

ever, the likening <strong>of</strong> museology to a<br />

science – even under development<br />

– has slowly been abandoned in so<br />

far as neither its object <strong>of</strong> study, nor<br />

its methods, truly correspond to the<br />

epistemological criteria <strong>of</strong> a specifi c<br />

scientifi c approach.<br />

4. The new museology (la nouvelle<br />

muséologie in French, where the<br />

concept originated) widely infl uenced<br />

museology in the 1980s, fi rst<br />

gathering some French theoreticians<br />

and then spreading internationally<br />

from 1984. Referring to a few pioneers<br />

who had published innovative<br />

texts since 1970, this current <strong>of</strong><br />

thought emphasised the social role<br />

<strong>of</strong> museums and its interdisciplinary<br />

character, along with its new styles <strong>of</strong><br />

expression and communication. New<br />

museology was particularly interested<br />

in new types <strong>of</strong> museums, conceived<br />

in contrast to the classical model<br />

in which collections are the centre <strong>of</strong><br />

interest. These new museums are ecomuseums,<br />

social museums, scientifi c<br />

and cultural centres, and generally<br />

speaking, most <strong>of</strong> the new proposals<br />

aimed at using the local heritage<br />

to promote local development. In<br />

English museum literature the term<br />

New <strong>Museology</strong> appeared at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1980s (Virgo, 1989) and is a<br />

critical discourse on the social and<br />

political role <strong>of</strong> museums – lending<br />

a certain confusion to the spread <strong>of</strong><br />

the French term, which is less known<br />

to the English-speaking public.<br />

5. According to a fi fth meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the term, which we favour here<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!