27.03.2013 Views

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

Key Concepts of Museology - ICOM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

5. The institution <strong>of</strong> heritage<br />

also has its detractors: people who<br />

question its origins and the abusive<br />

‘fetishist’ value attached to the forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the underlying culture, in the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> western humanism. In the<br />

strictest sense <strong>of</strong> the word, that is to<br />

say in the anthropological sense, our<br />

cultural heritage is only made up <strong>of</strong><br />

very modest practices and skills. To<br />

a far greater extent it depends on the<br />

ability to make and use these tools,<br />

especially when these are fi xed as<br />

objects inside a museum showcase.<br />

Too <strong>of</strong>ten we forget that the most elaborate<br />

and powerful tool invented by<br />

man is the concept, the instrument<br />

for developing thought, which is very<br />

diffi cult to arrange in a showcase.<br />

Cultural heritage understood as the<br />

sum total <strong>of</strong> the common evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

humankind has been severely criticised<br />

for being a new dogma (Choay,<br />

1992) in a society which has lost its<br />

religious bearings. It is possible,<br />

moreover, to list the successive stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> building this recent product: heritage<br />

reappropriation (Vicq d’Azyr,<br />

1794), spiritual connotation (Hegel,<br />

1807), mystical, disinterested connotation<br />

(Renan, 1882) and fi nally,<br />

humanism (Malraux, 1947). The<br />

notion <strong>of</strong> collective cultural heritage,<br />

which only transposes the legal and<br />

economic lexicon to the moral fi eld,<br />

appears suspicious, to say the least,<br />

and can be analysed as being part <strong>of</strong><br />

that which Marx and Engels called<br />

ideology, that is to say a by-product<br />

<strong>of</strong> a socio-economic context intended<br />

to serve special interests. “The<br />

internationalisation <strong>of</strong> the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> heritage is […] not only false, but<br />

dangerous in so far as one imposes a<br />

whole set <strong>of</strong> knowledge and prejudices<br />

whose criteria are the expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> values built on aesthetic, moral,<br />

and cultural received ideas, in short<br />

an ideology <strong>of</strong> a caste in a society<br />

whose structures are not compatible<br />

with those <strong>of</strong> the third world in<br />

general and Africa in particular”<br />

(Adotevi, 1971). It is all the more<br />

suspect because it coexists with the<br />

private nature <strong>of</strong> economic property<br />

and seems to serve as the consolation<br />

prize for the deprived.<br />

DERIVATIVES: HERITOLOGY, INHERITANCE.<br />

CORRELATED: COMMUNITY, CULTURAL PROPERTY,<br />

CULTURAL RELIC, EXHIBIT, EVIDENCE, IDENTITY, IMAGE,<br />

LEGACY, LIVING HUMAN TREASURE, MATERIAL CULTURE,<br />

MEMORY, MESSAGE, MONUMENT, NATIONAL TREASURE,<br />

OBJECT, PATRIMONY, REALITY, SEMIOPHORE (SEE<br />

OBJECT) SUBJECT, TERRITORY, THINGS, VALUE, WITNESS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!