27.03.2013 Views

NCCIDI'ATS WD KATAI.ITIES - Aviation Three die in air smash ...

NCCIDI'ATS WD KATAI.ITIES - Aviation Three die in air smash ...

NCCIDI'ATS WD KATAI.ITIES - Aviation Three die in air smash ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FLCIODS - Hunter Valley Trust (Con't.)<br />

Question of priorities (Note) 1,4:2<br />

Direction on new Maitland plan 1,4:2<br />

Ejnance 'need <strong>in</strong> flood plan" 1,4:3<br />

Hunter Valley Survey: Problems can be solved<br />

2,4:3<br />

Job for Hunter Va]le> Trust (Note) 4,4:2<br />

Flood grants practicable, Evatt claims 4,4:3<br />

Farmers call for aid 4,4:4<br />

Resit<strong>in</strong>^ plan seen as premature 5.4:2<br />

Farmers to meet on floods - 5,4:4<br />

Floodways urged to save Hunter areas 6,4:10<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gleton resit<strong>in</strong>g deferred 7,4:7<br />

Hope on silted farmlands 11,4:5<br />

Oversea flood expert wanted 13.4:4<br />

Commerce body on -floods 13.4:4<br />

Hunter River Bank - Tender accepted for<br />

stone 13.4:9<br />

No decision on resit<strong>in</strong>g 13.4:9<br />

Talks soon on flood plan 13.4:9<br />

£70,000 aid to farmers urged 14,4:3<br />

Valley League laws passed 14,4:8<br />

Case for new steel plant - J.B. Abbott<br />

14.4:11<br />

Farmers need help (Leader) 13.4:2<br />

Producers call for flood project 16.4:3<br />

Conference on flood control 18.4:2<br />

Councils to see plan for Maitland resit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

21.4:3<br />

Aid asked on broken banks 21.4:8<br />

'Great sums" needed to tame river- 21.4:9<br />

Plans laid for Flood body 22.4:2<br />

Flood storage area 'needed' 22.4:4<br />

"Magician wanted" to control flood 22.4:4<br />

Spillway plan for- Hunter 22.4:10<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancier not magician needed (Leader) 23.4:2<br />

Plan for New Maitland 27.4:1<br />

Council plans flood needs 27.4:2<br />

Plan for new city at Maitland 27,4:3<br />

2 Councils back Maitland plan 27,4:3<br />

New Maitland (Note) 28,4:2<br />

Plan for Hunter Valley: Co-operate with nature<br />

28,4:4<br />

What has been done: Land and river bank<br />

protection 29,4:5<br />

Flood area plans for trust 29,4:5<br />

Workshop plea deferred 4,5:2<br />

Plan to spill floodwater 4,5:6<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g for- the Uppei- Hunter (Leader)<br />

Requests to Cahill on River- 9,5:2<br />

Deputation on flood control 10,5:2<br />

-Fund allocations: job for flood committee<br />

10,5:3<br />

Key to flood relief seen <strong>in</strong> soil 10,5:3<br />

Council jo<strong>in</strong>s Association 11,5:2<br />

Trust election on July 14, 13.5:13<br />

Flood loan plan 18,,5:1<br />

Flood problem bigger 19,5:10<br />

Hexham flood plan backed 20,5:3<br />

M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g claim scouted 20,5:11<br />

Research move on floods 24,5:4<br />

Hunter facts (Note) 25,5:2<br />

M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> new city site: Statement<br />

exaggerated" 25.5:8<br />

Calls to sack Council fail 26.5:4<br />

Body for Civil Emergencies 27.5:2<br />

Choice of chief wardens 27.5:2<br />

Opposition to resit<strong>in</strong>g of Maitland<br />

Hunter authority: need questioned:<br />

1,6:5<br />

Dynamic is miss<strong>in</strong>g (Note) 2,6:2<br />

Beresfield protests at development ban<br />

3.6:2<br />

Beresfield has a case (Note) 4,6:2<br />

Deputation on levee costs 7,6:3<br />

Talks stalemate on area for resit<strong>in</strong>g 7,<br />

Trust subsidy for levees 8.6:4<br />

N.M.H. INDEX 23-1955<br />

9.5:2<br />

' grossly<br />

28.5:3<br />

Brewster<br />

.6:4<br />

Maitland applies for new area 8.6:10<br />

Experts study steps for emergencies<br />

9.6:4<br />

River diversion proposal 16.6:2<br />

Maitland takes up £40,000 offer 22.6:8<br />

Late nom<strong>in</strong>ation to trust 25.6:7<br />

"Wrong" to halt development - Beresfield<br />

plan criticised 28.6:2<br />

£1 Million authorised for Hunter flood work<br />

6.7:1<br />

Elood control forum soon 6.7:4<br />

Rise <strong>in</strong> Trust rates h<strong>in</strong>ted 6.7:8 ;11<br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister asked to visit Maitland 6.7:<br />

New realism on floods (Leader) 7.7:2<br />

Flood scheme praised 7.7:2 13.7:4<br />

Flood plan "would avoid losses'<br />

Fears about flood plan 14.7:2<br />

Hunter eng<strong>in</strong>eer resigns 14.7:2<br />

.7:4<br />

Plan to protect Upper Hunter 14,<br />

Vot<strong>in</strong>g lag <strong>in</strong> trust poll 14.7:6<br />

15,7:2<br />

Safeguard<strong>in</strong>g the Hunter Valley (Leader)<br />

Aid. Dorsman new Trust member 15.7:2<br />

Stop to flood work urged 15.7M<br />

Hunter- erosion alarm<strong>in</strong>g 15.7:4<br />

Flood area build<strong>in</strong>g: reaffirmation of ban<br />

urged 20.7:19<br />

FLOODS - Hunter Valley Trust (Con't.)<br />

Hunter floods over 137 years - G.A. Bates<br />

£25,000 Hunter scheme - "Varsity Group<br />

research' 25,7:2<br />

Hunter Valley facts (Note)<br />

Govt, flood-plan: first payout by trust<br />

3,8:4<br />

Research plan criticised 3,8:8<br />

Advance to buy area 3,8:11<br />

Flood report adopted 3,8:11<br />

Water Study at Abermusden 3.8:11<br />

Flood rate on City sought 3,8:11<br />

Data needed for flood plann<strong>in</strong>g 6.8:7<br />

Trust area rat<strong>in</strong>g: move to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Newcastle<br />

22,8:3<br />

Newcastle <strong>in</strong> Trust urged 7,9:4<br />

Revision likely on Mgitland ban 10,9:3<br />

Wait h<strong>in</strong>t on resite area 14.9:7<br />

Why Newcastle was excluded (Note) 17,9:2<br />

'No ga<strong>in</strong>" <strong>in</strong> Trust l<strong>in</strong>k 5.10:2<br />

Newcastle rat<strong>in</strong>g plan: Trust rul<strong>in</strong>g deferred<br />

5,10:4<br />

Flood work laws query 5.10:8<br />

Newcastle and the Hunter (Leader) 6.10:2<br />

Rise <strong>in</strong> grant to Maitland 8.10:10<br />

City opposes jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trust 12.10:2<br />

Flood grant accepted 12.10:7<br />

2 Flood jobs to start 18.10:1<br />

Action wanted on river 26.10:11<br />

Maitland scheme 'impracticable' 27.10:2<br />

Alternative for Maitland (Note) 28.10:2<br />

Quick action lil^ely on Maitland 28,10:6<br />

Trust wants Newcastle <strong>in</strong> 2.11:2<br />

Hunter Trust not to <strong>in</strong>crease rate 2.11:7<br />

50 p.c. subsidy on levee banks 2.11:11<br />

Floodway design <strong>in</strong> hand 10,11:15<br />

Clarification sought on embankments 9,11:11<br />

Flood report disucssed <strong>in</strong> camera 9,11:11<br />

Body for research on Hunter 11,11:2<br />

Move on levy for river banks fails 11,11:13<br />

New plan to conta<strong>in</strong> Hunter floods 12,11:10<br />

Levee grant may be reviewed 18,11:4<br />

Top planners present: Closed talks on resit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

18,11:13<br />

Farmers seek proposals on lagoon plan 23,11:4<br />

Flood area rat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> estimates 23,11:8<br />

Flood restoration work: praise for aid to<br />

farmers 2.12:7<br />

Levee bank rep<strong>air</strong>s could wait 10 years 7,12:7<br />

Floodgates to be discussed 7.12:9<br />

Flood relief,^ash for dra<strong>in</strong>age 7.12:9<br />

FLOODS - Mitigation<br />

Flood works: £12,466 grant 6.1:8<br />

Flood cheque for Maitland 19.1:11<br />

vVork on Wollombi Brook approved 2,2:4<br />

More could be done on floods (Leader) 26,2:2<br />

The Floods and the Community (Leader) 28.2:2<br />

Floods and the Nation's future (Leader) 1.3:2<br />

What can be done on floods (Leader) 3.3:2<br />

The problem of floods (Leader) 7,3:2<br />

Big flood prevention plan urged 11.3:2<br />

Inquiry plan on floods 11.3:2<br />

Someth<strong>in</strong>g must be done (Leader) 16,3:2<br />

Parliament on flood mitigation 16,3:4<br />

Dams only way to end floods 18,3:3<br />

State sets up flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>quiry group 23,3:1<br />

Report not enough (Note) 23,3:2<br />

Dredge move by P.P.U. 1.4:3<br />

Flood Inquiry Committee 2,4:3<br />

Group's move on flood<strong>in</strong>g 2,4:3<br />

House rejects plan on flood body 27,5:3<br />

Full flood report not ready yet 19,10:5<br />

Big floods 'may come' 1,12:8<br />

FLUORIDATION<br />

Fluoridation advocated: bad teeth <strong>in</strong> youths<br />

14,1:5<br />

Fluorides can be dangerous 29,1:3<br />

Treated water 'harmless' 7,11:2<br />

FOOD AND FOODSTUFFS<br />

Street sellers of ice cream must pay fee<br />

8,l;l<br />

Tragic tangle on rice - Dr. Peter Russo 15.1:5<br />

Penalty rates by cafes to-morrow 23,2:2<br />

Margar<strong>in</strong>e quota review 6.7:7<br />

Food sales drive <strong>in</strong> U.K.: £^ Million to be<br />

allocated 21.7il<br />

More food used <strong>in</strong> Australia<br />

Case for shops for M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g Boards: More powers<br />

Praise for 'Store movement'<br />

Biscuits cheaper 16.8|3<br />

New loaf impresses M<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

29.7:3<br />

9,8:3<br />

10.8:3<br />

12.8:3<br />

18.8:6<br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister's pledge to deputation 5.9:2<br />

Retailers' bid on standard 19,7:2<br />

Greater food output call 22.9:4<br />

Controls 'stop price cuts' 29.9:2<br />

Impropriety <strong>in</strong> quotas on margar<strong>in</strong>e 7.10:3<br />

Allegations by M.H.R. challenged 8.10:3<br />

Branch of shopmen at Lake 14.11:2<br />

Ellegalities claimed: Margar<strong>in</strong>e bill attached<br />

24.11-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!