27.03.2013 Views

Measuring Bullying, Victimization, Perpetration, and Bystander ...

Measuring Bullying, Victimization, Perpetration, and Bystander ...

Measuring Bullying, Victimization, Perpetration, and Bystander ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58<br />

PART II:<br />

Did this happen to you, during the past four weeks in school? (Leave the item blank if it did not happen<br />

to you). Read the items below <strong>and</strong> put a check mark in the box for the ones that are true for you. For<br />

each item you have checked, write down:<br />

• the number of times it took place during the past four weeks<br />

• the name of the student who did it to you – you can write a name more than once<br />

• his/her grade<br />

These questions are about yourself, during the past four weeks in school:<br />

1. This student hurt me by hitting or beating me up.<br />

2. This student said s/he would harm me or do bad things to me.<br />

3. This student set me up to make others blame me.<br />

4. This student took my things <strong>and</strong> did not give them back to me.<br />

5. This student teased me <strong>and</strong> made fun of me in a mean way.<br />

6. This student told lies <strong>and</strong> stories about me to make others dislike me.<br />

7. This student broke my things on purpose.<br />

8. This student called me bad names or made cruel jokes about me.<br />

9. This student told others not to be my friend.<br />

10. This student pushed me on purpose, made me fall <strong>and</strong> get hurt.<br />

11. This student phoned me to give me a hard time.<br />

12. This student said s/he would not be my friend if I didn’t do what s/he said.<br />

13. This student locked me up in a room or closed space.<br />

14. This student made mean jokes, noises, or faces at me when I walked by.<br />

15. This student made others leave me out of things.<br />

Number of times in<br />

the past 4 weeks<br />

Who did this<br />

to you?<br />

His/her<br />

grade<br />

Copyright © 2005 Sage Publications, Ltd. Reproduced by special permission of the publisher, Sage Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Rd., London, EC1Y 1SP,<br />

UK from: The efficacy of non-anonymous measures of bullying. School Psychology International, 26, 443–458 by John F. Chan, Rowan Myron, & Martin Crawshaw.<br />

Scoring Instructions<br />

PART I<br />

Physical <strong>Bullying</strong>: Items 1, 4, <strong>and</strong> 7<br />

Verbal <strong>Bullying</strong>: Items 2, 5, <strong>and</strong> 8<br />

Relational <strong>Bullying</strong>: Items 3, 6, <strong>and</strong> 9<br />

PART II<br />

Physical <strong>Victimization</strong>: Items 1, 4, 7, 10, <strong>and</strong> 13<br />

Verbal <strong>Victimization</strong>: Items 2, 5, 8, 11, <strong>and</strong> 14<br />

Relational <strong>Victimization</strong>: Items 3, 6, 9, 12, <strong>and</strong> 15<br />

Underlying the scoring rationale of the questionnaire<br />

is a frequency <strong>and</strong> dura¬tion parameter designed to<br />

operationally define persistence over time, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

the average occurrence of at least one incident per<br />

week during the past four weeks, expressed as a<br />

frequency of f ≥ 4.<br />

The application of the cut-off criterion at P + V + R ≥<br />

4 (P st<strong>and</strong>s for physical, V for verbal, R for relational)<br />

must be considered exploratory. This criterion was<br />

chosen for its comparability to other studies in<br />

defining a magnitude of weekly occurrence.<br />

It is also reasonable to expect that with equal<br />

weight assigned to the three types of bullying <strong>and</strong><br />

victimization in the combined rates P + V + R ≥ 4<br />

cut-off, student’s responses will be pushed towards<br />

reporting less severe events, which would not have<br />

been included as bullying if the global method had<br />

been used instead.<br />

Scores on the subscales are computed by summing<br />

the reported frequency of occurrence across<br />

subscale items. A frequency of four acts during the<br />

past four weeks is selected as the cut-off level for<br />

determining whether someone has engaged in bully<br />

perpetration or experienced bully victimization (e.g.,<br />

P + V + R ≥ 4, where P st<strong>and</strong>s for physical, V for<br />

verbal, <strong>and</strong> R for relational).<br />

References<br />

Chan, J. H. F., Myron, R. R., & Crawshaw, C. M.<br />

(2005). The efficacy of non-anonymous measures<br />

of bullying. School Psychology International, 26,<br />

443–458.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!